Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, May 18, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Main Street Lights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Main Street Lights

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Main Street Lights
    Posted: Jul 22 2011 at 4:01pm
Actually you might be best to carry a flashlight or simply stay in after dark since it is not safe in this town regardless of where you reside. Conceal/carry is also an option. 
Back to Top
acclaro View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acclaro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 22 2011 at 3:15pm
If I understand the flow of economic recalculation to be accurate, what was once estimated to be nearly $9,000 is now $2,000, and the residents in the historic area desiring the lamps are willing to pay .5%, leaving a balance of $1,000, in addition to almost a 4X monthly increase in operations. Do I have that right sj?
 
And if so, the difference of $1,000 is so nominal, then why can't the residents in that area benefitting simply pick up the minor balance right? If there are about 32 residents here, or perhaps that was the 60% required to pass it, its about $32.00 each, the cost of the monthy DSL bill. So, I agree...they should pay it, its negligible.
 
I would have great and keen interest to keep the topic and eye on any attempts the city had to raise $3.50 monthly, for any Duke maintenance fee on lighting in Middletown. On two occasions, I have callled Duke and they have come out and immediately changed the light bulb in the street light next to my driveway, with no city involvement. I also do not comprehend why that is a dublicate bill, as some aspect of any lighting would come out of the .25% increase in general public safety.
 
Any attempt to make a few $ a month times all the total street lamps, when it is also being gotten elsewhere, is absolutely wrong. This is one I'd like to ask others to keep their eyes on, as really get into the details, if indeed, the city passes on a $3.50 monthly maintenance for the Duke lighting.
 
Middletown, between the two tax levies including the nonsensical one especially for paying down Sr Citizen debt, is just driving more and more away from the city sinking in despair.  
       
Back to Top
ground swat View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 31 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ground swat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 22 2011 at 2:41pm
No thanks if we have to go thru this nightmare to get the "Facts" it's easier to buy a tiki lamp. Keep the city off of my street.  In regards to your other topics SJ water/sewer/backflow costs all need to be investigated.
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 22 2011 at 8:57am
good one middie!
 
my solution:
Assuming a "final" cost( or approx.)  for lighting/installation has been agreed and properly pro-rated to the affected property owners:
The minor cost of the public sector could be picked up by the same neighborhood association that offered to pay 1/2 of that cost. Why 50% of such a small #? Why not simply cover it all since they recieve the benefit?
 
Create a pro-rated monthly assessment for the increased monthly cost(400%!!) of operating this lighting. Same could be done in the Highlands area, the former downtown area, and anywhere else where this expensive lighting has been installed. Since it has become so easy for the city to add new costs/fees to water/sewer/trash billing invoices(and city already plans to add a fee for streetlight maintenence/power), this monthly assessment could be added also.The areas featuring this more expensive lighting are areas of greater affluence than the areas without. There should be no increased financial hardship created for those with less income for services not fully recieved.  It simply isn't fair. As utility costs increase, everyones' share increases,
 
Since this new lighting is so much safer and illuminating, it should be installed everywhere when road improvements are made"(especially since installation has become so affordable in this case!). I surely want it on my street, and in less safe areas of the community that have more walker traffic. Soon everyone will be sharing the cost equally, while recieving full benefit from the more efficient, effective and safe street lamping.
 
Opinions?
Back to Top
FmrMidE View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Oct 08 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FmrMidE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 15 2011 at 5:21pm
You can "earmark", "designate", "make a friggin constitutional amendment that funds be used for a certain thing-but Les the Lawless and Justice (for me) Judy will take them anyway-as they happily sing their new duet
"What's Law Got To Do With It?" (with apologies to Tina Turner)...
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 15 2011 at 2:34pm
Voice...

"And VietVet, although S. Main has some impressive homes on it, I would hardly call it "high-fallutin'" given the hodge podge of historic homes/Section 8 homes, wealthy/poor, high income/low income, owner-occupied/rental units, and also its proximity to some of the drug-infested parts of town. I'm not suggesting you're guilty of this, necessarily, but there does seem to be a fair amount of class envy on this forum. And my concern is that Middletown is made worse off because many people would rather drag down the well-to-do of this city than fault the un-educated and multi-generational LBJ "Great Society" ne'erdowells for making this town a far worse place than it used to be".

The "high-fallutin" comment was with tongue in cheek and the use of sarcasm. It was not meant to be taken seriously. I am aware that as you travel toward Barnitz Stadium the neighborhood becomes increasingly more dicey with the nicer homes just outside the downtown area.

Fair amount of class envy? Won't speak for the rest of the people here, but for me, I don't envy them. It is more like a dislike for the upper class/rich. IN GENERAL, they tend to be more pompous, more arrogant and more disgusting to be around than the middle and lower class folks. Yes, if guilt needs to be assigned, I am a guilty party to this thinking. True.   

"And my concern is that Middletown is made worse off because many people would rather drag down the well-to-do of this city than fault the un-educated and multi-generational LBJ "Great Society" ne'erdowells for making this town a far worse place than it used to be"

Actually, again speaking for myself, I have made a habit of "sticking the old knife" in the well-to-do here in town in equal proportion to the jabs I have given to the Section 8/freeloading/government handout people. I am opposed to the overabundance of low income HUD crap in this town (and what it is doing to this town) as well as some of the pompous a--h---- that are the so-called powerbrokers calling the shots in this town. Both infuriate me in different ways. No, I am for the slowly dying middle class, the ones who are being fleeced from both groups mentioned. Both groups are making this town a far worse place. They are just doing it in different ways.....and the people stuck in the middle are paying the price. JMO

Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 15 2011 at 3:17am
Voice,
By Jove, I think you've got it!
On South Main Street, since there are already existing lights, the cost to the taxpayers should be ZERO!!!
Zero for demo;  zero for trenching up and down each side of the street;  zero for underground conduit;  zero for the foundations; zero for the lamposts and globes!!!  Zero for labor;   zero for materials and supplies;  zero for equipment usage; zero for overhead and profit.  Zero for the whole darned job!!!
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Voice of Reason View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Oct 13 2010
Location: Williams
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Voice of Reason Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 14 2011 at 10:56pm
Pacman,
 
Perhaps there is no difference in 2 12's vs. 1 24; I suggest something along those lines because other continuously operating institutions like hospitals or manufacturers (like AK) schedule their employees for 12 or 8 hours per shift, never 24.  I will readily admit that I'm not fully up to speed on this issue, just that it doesn't, at first glance, appear to be the most efficient way to schedule an operation.  I am, however, open to be convinced that their current modus operandi is the best way.  And the idea of having a smaller firefighter force that is augmented by volunteers, as Kettering, does, is something that certainly ought to be considered.  If you say they have 52 paid firefighters vs. Middletown's (approximately) 75 then there is a potential for some signficant savings, and such an arrrangement ought to be further researched. 
 
Also, I would be in favor of allocating several additional dollars of the water bill each month towards street repairs as you suggest, and I agree that it ought to be "earmarked" for only street repairs and not lost into the general fund somewhere. 
 
Mike,
 
I agree with your principle that the city ought to either extend the same privileges to the rest of its citizens that are (potentially) being bestowed upon S. Main or it ought to withhold those extra privileges from the S. Main residents if it won't extend them to the rest of the city.  And I have conceded that perhaps the petition needs to be modified so that the petitioners also cover the portion that of the street that is city owned.  But one thing I'm not clear on--you say that there is an "extra" cost of demolishing the existing lights, and I would concur that this cost is separate from the installation of the new lights.  Are you certain that this cost of demolition is not covered by the petition as it stands now?  If so, what are your source documents?  I don't know either way myself, but I would agree with you that this cost of demolition ought to be included in the assessment along with the cost of the installation.  And I further agree that if your drinking partner wanted decorative lights on his street that the residents ought to pay for the incremental cost over and above the cost of the standard lights, as you suggest.
 
And VietVet, although S. Main has some impressive homes on it, I would hardly call it "high-fallutin'" given the hodge podge of historic homes/Section 8 homes, wealthy/poor, high income/low income, owner-occupied/rental units, and also its proximity to some of the drug-infested parts of town.  I'm not suggesting you're guilty of this, necessarily, but there does seem to be a fair amount of class envy on this forum.  And my concern is that Middletown is made worse off because many people would rather drag down the well-to-do of this city than fault the un-educated and multi-generational LBJ "Great Society" ne'erdowells for making this town a far worse place than it used to be. 
"Ask not what your country can do for you..." JFK
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 13 2011 at 9:55am
Sounds like the gentleman with no lights on his street could use those "Mulliganlamps" to illuminate his neighborhood rather than pitch 'em in the dump. Would be kinda "prestigious" knowing your street lights came from the high-fallutin' area of town, wouldn't it? Give a man some braggin' rights. Could even salvage the light poles with a flatbed semi to load and transport them from S. Main to his neighborhood, some electric wires run and some holes dug and he's in business.
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 13 2011 at 3:04am

Voice:

Earlier tonight, I was discussing the petition and assessment issues with a gentleman over a few beers. He pointed out that his street has NO street lights, and asked if my position would be the same if the residents of his street petitioned for street lighting with decorative lampposts and faux gaslight globes.

I told him it would be the same in principle. However, in that case, if the city owned property on his street, that the taxpayers should be willing to pay the cost of STANDARD street lighting for their percentage of frontage, but that the cost over and above the cost of the standard installation should be solely to the account of the other property owners.

Perhaps this makes my stance on the South Main Street lights more clear. On South Main Street, there is no cost to install standard street lights, since they already exist.  In fact, there is an EXTRA cost to demo functioning, existing street lights that are the standard for residential neighborhoods throughout the city. 

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 12 2011 at 9:01pm
VOR - I am not sure I understand your reasoning behind two 12 hour shifts vs 1 24 hour shift for Middletown Firefighters. What exactly would the 12 hour night shift during down time?? sleeping, watching TV? If the night shift is from 8pm - 8am I could see them doing some work from 8pm - midnight but after that, what else would there be to do, sleep or watch tv?

Of course the MFD could take a lesson form Kettering Fire Dept. Which operates a paid/volunteer fire dept in a city larger that Middletown Population wise. They have 52 paid fire fire fighters and 102 voluteers.

You can read more about it at http://www.ketteringoh.org/newweb/departments/fire/fire_main.php

Concerning the $2M for road repair I am not quite sure how much is budgeted each yr right now, but if it is approx $1.2M the simplest way to get to $2M is to take the $3.50-$3.75 (not sure about this amount) that is being talked about being added to our water bills for street lights and add this approx $750,000.00 to the annual budgeted amount for road repair. this would give you $2M without having to layoff firefighters or police officers.

It has been mentioned in several city council meetings by the city manager that these funds for street lights could be designated on road repairs. The only thing you need to watch out for is that the city manager/city council doesn't take the street light money in the front door and then take a like amount from the current road budget and move it somewhere else through the back door. This has been done by many states with their lottery proceeds and education funds. All of these funds should be designated soley for road repairs and nothing else by resolution.
Back to Top
Richard Saunders View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jun 30 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Richard Saunders Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 12 2011 at 4:07am

For the love of all things holy, let us be perfectly honest. Is there anyone left over the age of sixteen, other than those who feed at the public teat, who can possibly still believe that the City of Middletown’s government is “business friendly?”

Back to Top
Vivian Moon View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council


Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 8:15pm
Ground Swat
Looking to bring new business to town is great...however...several years ago the the City stated they were concerned about the current business community here and were going to visit each one to see if they could help them in any way so they wouldn't go out of business during these trying times....Well I have talked with numerous business owers and the City has never contacted them.
It seems the only time they visit a local business is to nail them for a violation...that sure ain't business friendly to me. Now we have additional fines and more paperwork for a new business to deal with..mercy.
The Lenny Robinson saga was simply unbelieveable in every way.
Back to Top
ground swat View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 31 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ground swat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 5:55pm
I'm afraid it's going to have to get worse before it gets better Ms. Moon.  Didn't mean to jump into a conversation that was really intended for Mr. P. Very passionate about the future of this town. Again I have NO problems with residents dropping their on money on improvements that increase the value of the neighborhood but what about the management of our tax dollars to fix the streets that we have payed into?  And talking about improving the look of the town, how about starting out at the highway. Had a great person to help there and I'm sure his heart is still with Middletown but the way Mr. Robinson was treated I wouldn't blame him if he never said a kind word about this town again. The actions of the citizens in this town are and always have been to improve the quality of life.  Certainly those who devote their time and sanity on council deserve our respect and should be able to take a chance at drawing in new business, but what about the businesses that have sunk tens of millions of dollars to keep up with todays market, does the city ever reach out to help them?  How bout that steering commitee or a Admin. that can't make a decision or trust it's on employees to take care of our cities cemetery. It's not about the lamps for me it's about the track record of this leadership on the second floor!
Back to Top
Vivian Moon View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council


Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 2:45pm
Ground Swat
I'm sooo old I can remember when the only debt of a family was on their home.
That's when cash was king.
Yep we have come a long way baby...however I believe it was in the wrong direction.
Back to Top
ground swat View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 31 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ground swat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 12:12pm
Spend money to make money, do it every day.  We all know, at least this is what has been allowed to happen, that government is not run like a private company. Pretty obvious since known of us could operate with a debt hitting 15 trillion or be allowed a 8 billion dollar debt like our state has. Trust me this worries me way more than south Main getting lamp post.  Curb appeal to lessen section 8?  Wasn't Adkins going up against the state to lay the law down and rid us of some of this problem?  Zoning requirements are a part of life, whats great about them is keeping up with them and being able to afford them in the long run, seen the new schools lately, great crop of weeds. We all agree that the focus should be on revenues and not from more levies but new business. An attractive town with quality infrastructure certainly is needed but who's our salesman? Who's working with the unions and getting them sold on our "Vision" so they will help in shouldering some of the load on this loss of revenue. I'm not "sweating" the little things, just the folks we have put in charge of my childerns future local, state and Fed don't really impress me. Put up or shutup is what it's coming down to, got a couple of weeks before the paper work is due SJ we could go in and rattle the cage!
Back to Top
LMAO View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Oct 28 2009
Location: Middletucky
Status: Offline
Points: 468
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LMAO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 10:08am
We all should know by now that are spineless ones are going to do as they please.Main Street will get there fancy ass lights and dont care what we think.I pray every night that they (the spineless ones) will get kicked out of office for the nonsense thy have put this city through. They are nothing but theifs.
I still like to know why Mullethead and Kohler are so special that we the taxpayers have to pay for their fancy ass lights.Smile
Back to Top
Vivian Moon View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council


Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 9:41am
Spiderjohn
I see no change in sight for the next 5 years other than a downward spiral with an every increasing debt load for the taxpayers.
Didn’t Gary Barge and his neighborhood sign a petition about the condition of the canal property only for the City to tell him that they didn’t have $200,000 to even start the repairs?  Don’t you think this is a more serious problem that should have priority in the budget?
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 8:34am
the streetlight situation just gets more interesting.
no doubt the resolution will be dramatic, while the long-range precendent and consequences are most important. The far from equal treatment among certain areas and entities plays an always huge role.
 
so--vor and mr.p---where do you go past the discussion stage here?
how are you communicating with local influences to change things?
I have strayed from dealinmg with Council and admin.
I have pretty much burned all bridges in that direction, while they view me as a nuisance/joke any more(and vice versa!)
 
adding more section 8 to the same over-stressed areas and cutting public safety and raising taxes simply won't take us anywhere towards improvement imo..
 
the natives are restless and growing more dis-satisfied every day(and I am talking high-end citizens).
everyone has pretty much seen enough of the the non-productive(even destructive) side show.
 
some interesting and alternative discussion groups are out there now--hopefully for the best.
I am trying to work with others outside the system to bring legitimate constructive and serious change, starting with the lead-up to the next election process. I surely can't accomplish much, so I simply hope to plant a seed in the minds of a few who have a much stronger voice.
 
A new, younger bureacracy must be established, anchored by the few younger family groups and residents who want to make this area their home, with quality of life amenities/options and a friendlier place to live.
 
Let's see what happens...........
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 11 2011 at 5:37am

Voice:

I believe we are beginning to reach some common ground. Whether or not we ever agree completely, I think this has been a worthwhile discussion.

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

Ground Swat--you've missed my point. Spending money your money on things such as nice light fixtures and re-paving the roads enhances the town, as would implementing strict zoning requirements that would make it unattractive for Section 8 slumlords to operate in MIddletown (because of the increased cost of owning real estate.
Even though you’ve addressed this portion to Ground Swat, I’d like to interject a comment. It is my personal belief that the future of Middletown (and America) depends to a great degree upon the success of a vibrant, successful middle class, including senior citizens able to live out their retirements in a decent degree of comfort and security. We must be careful that in attempts to “increase the cost of owning real estate” for slum lords, we do not simultaneously price the middle class out of owning real estate. If I have understood you correctly, you are middle class, as am I. Certainly, you keep up your residence adequately, as I try to do. Sometimes I get the feeling that City Hall is trying to drive the middle class out of Middletown already. I hope that I am wrong.

 

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

My point was that the city administration ought to spend more of our money on such enhancements with the hope that it will help build a more attractive town; I was making the opposite point that you are. I don't think it's important to worry about every single penny--it's far more important to worry about keeping happy the people who do actually keep up their homes and are active in the community than to sweat $9K out of a $28M budget.
I must disagree here. If you have followed the City budget talks as closely as I have, and if City Hall is to be believed, they actually DO have to worry about every penny!!! That is why I find some of the spending so bizarre, and why I get my underwear in such a knot at times. Our municipal debt load increases every year, as we keep refinancing and borrowing more. We keep hearing about the need for higher city property and income taxes. They say that within three years our “rainy day fund” will be gone.  If we do not "watch every penny" we are headed for insolvency and State supervision of our finances (which may not be a bad thing!)

 

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

It's far more important that the city leaders make tough decisions regarding the police and fire (and administrative) budgets, which are the vast majority of what the city spends its money on than to deal with a neighborhood enhancement project. And by the way, we'd get far more bang for our buck, in my opinion if we spent $1M re-paving some roads and tearing down empty, dilapated housing units than we would spending it on, say, fire department staffing (many of whom don't live in Middletown, but that's another discussion).
The City DOES have some tough decisins to make regarding Public Safety forces, and the Public safety forces, likewise, have some decisions to make, in my humble opinion. (Side note: I am 99.9% certain that it is illegal to require public employees to reside within the jurisdiction by which they are employed, so, yes, that is another discussion.)

I would be, and have been in favor of finding funds in other areas. Street repairs and re-paving are legitimate uses for CBDG funds, yet City Hall refuses to even consider the notion, choosing instead to fritter such funds away every year and even TURN the funds BACK TO THE FEDS, unused rather that use it for our streets!! I find this unconscionable.  Oh, and YES, I would rather see this $9,900 be applied to another street project than to tearing out perfectly good street lights and installing decorative lampposts!

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

That brings me to a question posed to me by Mike Presta. Mike, I'll grant that you have a point in that spending $9K for every 8-block stretch of the city would get very expensive, and so perhaps this petition is somewhat untenable as is. As I had said above, perhaps it would be "perfect" if it required the citizens to cover the city's portion, therefore making it a $198K for the people of S. Main rather than a $189K assessment. Such a change likely wouldn't alter the signature count of the petition.
I agree that the signature count would not change, and if that were so, I would hold no objection to the action. However, my heart would go out to the few, such as the two ladies who spoke in opposition at the last Public Hearing, who seem to be good middle-class citizens who are “on the edge” financially, and who fear that the extra assessment might push them over the edge. I would certainly support some sort of fundraising effort on their behalf.

 

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

But, I think you'd also have to concede this point--just how many neighborhoods in MIddletown could get 60%+ of their residents to vote for such a petition? I bet it would be an exceedingly low number. So in effect what we would do as a city is deny people who care about their neighborhood the opportunity to enhance it, 95%+ paid for by themselves, because in principle this petition is too expensive to implement everywhere else, where it would be opposed by the poor people and Section 8 slumlords (I say that because that seemed to be the primary opposition to this petition based on who was reported to sign it and the reasons given for opposing it). Again, this line of reasoning helps guarantee that Middletown will continue to be populated by the poor and slumlord lobby, as they are the ones who are most likely to oppose such petitions.
If you are asking “how many neighborhoods would support an assessment to tear out perfectly adequate street lights and install olde tyme street lights?” I would agree very few. I doubt many Middletonians are that shallow and wasteful. However, if our street had NO street lights, I’d lay even money that 60% would sign a petition to install STANDARD street lights. I would’ve laid higher odds that that a few years ago, before the economy got so terribly bleak.

But the point is, if the city is willing to do it for one eight block section, they should be willing to do it for EVERY eight block section.  I doubt that they are willing.  I doubt that they would even entertain a petition in MOST areas of town to tear out perfectly good street lights and install decorative lamppost with a $9,900 cost to the city.
 

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

But I will try to answer the questions you posed to me--where would I find the money (say it would cost about $1M per year)? I would drastically change the nature of the fire department operations, moving to12-hour shift schedules and require the firefighters to work 3 or 4 shifts every other week to ensure 24/7 coverage. I would actually even explore privatizing the fire department, but that would be very tough to get done (for now). Saving $1M/ year would require cutting about 10-12 fire positions, which I bet could be done with a change in operational procedures as I have suggested without sacrificing effectiveness of the department.
I think that I’ve mentioned before that I’ve discussed this with firefighters, and when they explain to me why this way is better, it always makes sense at the time, but I can never replicate their argument properly. Perhaps one of the firefighters who read this forum can explain it to us. Or stop by any of our fire stations. I’ve always found the people there happy to answer any questions that citizens have.

 

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

Whose tastes get to determine the enhancements being voted upon? Well, that would fall the originators of the petitioners and those who are asked to sign the petition, of course. If, for example, a group came to me wanting to replace the sidewalks in my neighborhood with junked car hoods, I would vote no (as would a majority of my neighborhood, I reckon). If a group came to me asking if I wanted to put in decorative lights or potted flowers and a sprinkler system in the median, I would vote yes. Thus, the taste is determined by the signatories of the petition.
Just as we have now with the Historic Commission, the same small group would be having fits every time anyone anywhere in town wanted to do something that they didn’t think was up to THEIR standards. That’s why I think the olde Tyme lights in front of the Pendleton Center shining on junque car hoods is such a hoot!!! If any other business, anywhere else in town would’ve tried that, you would’ve heard a hue and cry that would’ve split your ear drums!!!

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

So now that I've answered your questions, perhaps you'll address one of mine that you overlooked--how much of the police and fire budgets would you cut to free up, say, $2M worth of funds to add to what the city is already spending on roads? You've made your point about how valuable it is to be at the head of the list for the street repairs--ok, I do grant your point, but I still don't see how S. Main has benefitted "unfairly". I have noticed that nearby Yankee Rd. has been re-paved recently, and that seems to be a much less traveled street, though perhaps it was in worse condition. But my point is that if Yankee Rd., which is near S. Main, is much less traveled, and hardly has many residents that seem well-connected to city hall, can get re-paved early in this process, then I don't see any obvious inequity or gross errors in the street re-paving program.
I think I’ve partially addressed the road funding above. I think that we can free up funds for street repairs outside of the Public Safety budget using CDBG funds. Also, there is the money we get from the GASOLINE tax that is supposed to be used for street maintenance. Likewise for the funds that we receive from license plate sales. Yet, I do think that we should control the Public Safety budget as closely as we can without overly jeopardizing the public safety. I think that the time has come for police and fire pensions and health care contributions to come closer into line with the private sector. It’s not that I think those who put their lives on the line for the public don’t deserve more, it’s just that we can no longer afford to give them more. We are going broke!

On the other hand, How can we tell our Public Safety workers we are going broke, then turn around and spend $9,900 to tear out perfectly good street lights and put up DECORATIVE lampposts???

As for the road queue criteria, I’ve already admitted I don’t know how they choose, I’ve simply made observations. I had occasion last night (Saturday) to drive on the section of Main in question, and a little later northbound on South Breiel (between Oxford State Road and Lefferson). Breiel is in worse shape, and I’d be amazed if it didn’t carry more traffic than South Main near Kohler’s and the Mayor’s houses. Now, I don’t drive all that many roads in Middletown (or anywhere else, for that matter), and I usually drive the same routes (as I generally go to the same places--I live a dull life) so I can’t speak of every road in town. But when I drive on S. Main, it just doesn’t seem to be in as rough of shape as many of the other roads that I’ve mentioned that are as heavily (or more heavily) traveled. I could be wrong.

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

But back to my point about the police and fire budget cuts. You say it takes $120M to get everything repaired and ship-shape; ok, I'll take that as a given. You also say we spend less than $2M re-paving our streets currently; ok, granted. So if I were to propose that we cut $2M from somewhere else in the budget (and I'm asking you from where this money will come), that would mean we, as a city, are currently spending $3M-$4M on street repaving. If I also take it as given that the average life of a city street is 20-25 years, we are actually not that far from achieving the goal of good streets, if we can get the spending up to about $4M per year. I say we are not that far from achieving the goal of good streets because your $120M figure, broken up into $4M annual expenditures puts us at about 30 years per street. Not too bad, probably.
I agree, that would not be too bad!!! I hope that my figures are correct. I am basing them on my memory (always a scary proposition) of figures from committee meetings at City Hall. However, asphalt is petroleum based and road repairs and re-paving is fuel intensive, so I would not be surprised if the cost has risen.

Originally posted by Voice of Reason Voice of Reason wrote:

Thus, finding an extra few milliion bucks over what we spend now would solve our street problems, would you agree? So I'll ask it again--how much of the police and fire budgets would you be willing to cut to get us up to the point of a sustainable street re-paving program? Perhaps you think I'm picking on the police and fire departments, but truly I'm only suggesting them because, as Willie Sutton observed (in a different context, of course), "that's where the money is." If you want re-paved streets you've got to cut where the money is, and in our case it's in the police and fire budgets.
I’ve tried to answer your question above, granted slightly in bits and pieces. But that’s not where ALL the money is. You should bear in mind that the City’s real budget is somewhere around $130 MILLION per year. The $28 million is just the General fund. Granted, some of the remaining $102 million is in “enterprise” funds that are restricted to certain uses, but not all of it. If the administration tried as hard to find money for streets as they do when they want money for downtown, or for historic stuff, or for the arts, etc., etc. ad nauseam, there could be plenty of money for streets. But then some of the stuff that the small “in crowd” group wants to do would have to suffer!!!

Just remember, whenever the “right” people want money for something, they NEVER seem to have any trouble at all finding a half million, or so, dollars “tucked away in one of our other funds” that they forgot they had that is available for them!!!

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Voice of Reason View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Oct 13 2010
Location: Williams
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Voice of Reason Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 10 2011 at 10:45pm
Ground Swat--you've missed my point.  Spending money your money on things such as nice light fixtures and re-paving the roads enhances the town, as would implementing strict zoning requirements that would make it unattractive for Section 8 slumlords to operate in MIddletown (because of the increased cost of owning real estate. 
 
My point was that the city administration ought to spend more of our money on such enhancements with the hope that it will help build a more attractive town; I was making the opposite point that you are.  I don't think it's important to worry about every single penny--it's far more important to worry about keeping happy the people who do actually keep up their homes and are active in the community than to sweat $9K out of a $28M budget.  It's far more important that the city leaders make tough decisions regarding the police and fire (and administrative) budgets, which are the vast majority of what the city spends its money on than to deal with a neighborhood enhancement project.  And by the way, we'd get far more bang for our buck, in my opinion if we spent $1M re-paving some roads and tearing down empty, dilapated housing units than we would spending it on, say, fire department staffing (many of whom don't live in Middletown, but that's another discussion).
 
That brings me to a question posed to me by Mike Presta.  Mike, I'll grant that you have a point in that spending $9K for every 8-block stretch of the city would get very expensive, and so perhaps this petition is somewhat untenable as is.  As I had said above, perhaps it would be "perfect" if it required the citizens to cover the city's portion, therefore making it a $198K for the people of S. Main rather than a $189K assessment.  Such a change likely wouldn't alter the signature count of the petition. 
 
But, I think you'd also have to concede this point--just how many neighborhoods in MIddletown could get 60%+ of their residents to vote for such a petition?  I bet it would be an exceedingly low number.  So in effect what we would do as a city is deny people who care about their neighborhood the opportunity to enhance it, 95%+ paid for by themselves, because in principle this petition is too expensive to implement everywhere else, where it would be opposed by the poor people and Section 8 slumlords (I say that because that seemed to be the primary opposition to this petition based on who was reported to sign it and the reasons given for opposing it).  Again, this line of reasoning helps guarantee that Middletown will continue to be populated by the poor and slumlord lobby, as they are the ones who are most likely to oppose such petitions. 
 
But I will try to answer the questions you posed to me--where would I find the money (say it would cost about $1M per year)?  I would drastically change the nature of the fire department operations, moving to12-hour shift schedules and require the firefighters to work 3 or 4 shifts every other week to ensure 24/7 coverage.  I would actually even explore privatizing the fire department, but that would be very tough to get done (for now).  Saving $1M/ year would require cutting about 10-12 fire positions, which I bet could be done with a change in operational procedures as I have suggested without sacrificing effectiveness of the department. 
 
Whose tastes get to determine the enhancements being voted upon?  Well, that would fall the originators of the petitioners and those who are asked to sign the petition, of course.  If, for example, a group came to me wanting to replace the sidewalks in my neighborhood with junked car hoods, I would vote no (as would a majority of my neighborhood, I reckon).  If a group came to me asking if I wanted to put in decorative lights or potted flowers and a sprinkler system in the median, I would vote yes.  Thus, the taste is determined by the signatories of the petition. 
 
So now that I've answered your questions, perhaps you'll address one of mine that you overlooked--how much of the police and fire budgets would you cut to free up, say, $2M worth of funds to add to what the city is already spending on roads?  You've made your point about how valuable it is to be at the head of the list for the street repairs--ok, I do grant your point, but I still don't see how S. Main has benefitted "unfairly".  I have noticed that nearby Yankee Rd. has been re-paved recently, and that seems to be a much less traveled street, though perhaps it was in worse condition.  But my point is that if Yankee Rd., which is near S. Main, is much less traveled, and hardly has many residents that seem well-connected to city hall, can get re-paved early in this process, then I don't see any obvious inequity or gross errors in the street re-paving program. 
 
But back to my point about the police and fire budget cuts.  You say it takes $120M to get everything repaired and ship-shape; ok, I'll take that as a given.  You also say we spend less than $2M re-paving our streets currently; ok, granted.  So if I were to propose that we cut $2M from somewhere else in the budget (and I'm asking you from where this money will come), that would mean we, as a city, are currently spending $3M-$4M on street repaving.  If I also take it as given that the average life of a city street is 20-25 years, we are actually not that far from achieving the goal of good streets, if we can get the spending up to about $4M per year.  I say we are not that far from achieving the goal of good streets because your $120M figure, broken up into $4M annual expenditures puts us at about 30 years per street.  Not too bad, probably. 
 
Thus, finding an extra few milliion bucks over what we spend now would solve our street problems, would you agree?  So I'll ask it again--how much of the police and fire budgets would you be willing to cut to get us up to the point of a sustainable street re-paving program?  Perhaps you think I'm picking on the police and fire departments, but truly I'm only suggesting them because, as Willie Sutton observed (in a different context, of course), "that's where the money is."  If you want re-paved streets you've got to cut where the money is, and in our case it's in the police and fire budgets. 
"Ask not what your country can do for you..." JFK
Back to Top
Vivian Moon View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council


Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 10 2011 at 10:51am

Ground Swat

If you own a home in a historic district I believe you get special tax deduction.
I know that several years ago special historic CDBG funds were given to residents on Main Street because they were in the 2nd Ward.
Several years ago the city paid to become a member of Hertiage Ohio so special grants could be given to downtown and Main Street property owners. What happened to this program?
We also know that Mr. Adkins was working on filling out the paperwork with the Ohio Historical Society so the city could file for grants from them.
The current Downtown Fund shows that $5,000 grants for new business facades are still being given.
I guess I’m a bit confused with all this historic funding floating around and no funds are available for these new light fixtures in the historic district.

 What is actual cost of a single light fixture plus 150’ of wire.

Back to Top
ground swat View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 31 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ground swat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 09 2011 at 11:04pm
Wouldn't it be "Neat" if the same people who scream about why we have so much section 8 and can't understand why more citizens don't confront the Admin. about it could apply that same logic to why it's important to question the same folks on how they spend our money. It always amazes me when people who play golf bitch about why their course can't look and play like the ones on the PGA, all it takes is money and a vision with leadership. By the way does anyone know were that line starts for "Handouts" of all that money we seem to have. Thats Ok not one business owner I know wants a damn thing given to them other than fair and balanced application of our laws, which I won't bring up. Getting the feeling I'm coming off as a anti-I should belief and trust everything I'm told taxpayer. 
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 09 2011 at 8:07pm

Voice:

After further reflection, I feel behooved to expand slightly on my comments of early this morning.

You must bear in mind that our system of local government is not a pure democracy, but more of a democratic republic. That is, we all vote for elected officials who then represent us with their votes on issues that affect us all.

Even still, the entire electorate of our city is entitled to vote on specific items of taxation, for example: the Senior Citizens’ levy that you mention, or the Public Health levy. Hence, if such a levy passes we must all live with the consequences, even if not everyone benefits equally, as the majority has ruled.

However, when a small group of residents petitions our city government to expend municipal funds on a project that benefits only that small group, for example the decoration of a few blocks of a single street without a vote of the entire city, it is incumbent upon our elected officials to scrutinize such an expenditure in order to decide upon its logic, fairness and wisdom before either approving or denying it. This duty is especially important when a municipality’s finances are facing a crisis point, as is the case with Middletown.

Also, you seem to think that it is worth spending $9,000 of public funds to slightly enhance the appearance, to a very small degree, of these nine blocks of Main Street.  63% of the property owners, by front footage, agree with you. I might even agree with you, if our city had a surplus of a Billion dollars or so. But let me ask you, and the members of City Council, this:

“Would you be willing to spend $9,000 from the budget of the City on each and every eight block stretch of each and every street in the city of Middletown to enhance the appearance of the area to the same small degree?”

If you would not, then you cannot be in favor of this.  If you would, I have two additional questions:

  1. Where do you propose to get the money?
  2. Since every other eight block stretch would get to choose their own "decoration" (as this goup did) how do you propose to decide whose "taste" is the correct "taste"?
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 09 2011 at 10:18am
Voice- "But I'd like to make the point that having some art, education, and nicer amenities in town doesn't hurt the city--it might actually help the city and change the perception that Middletown is a dump".

AGREE VOICE, BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME IRONY HERE DOESN'T THERE? ON ONE HAND, THE CITY LEADERS ARE TRYING THEIR BEST TO BRING IN SOME CULTURE WITH THE PAC AND THE ARTZY CROWD DOWNTOWN. THEY SEEM TO BE MORE THAN CONTENT TO APPEASE THE S. MAIN ST. CROWD WITH THEIR STREET LIGHTS. THEN, WITH THE OTHER HAND, THEY APPLY FOR EVERY FRIKKIN' HUD PROGRAM AVAILABLE, LURING TO TOWN EVERY LOW INCOME, GOVERNMENT ASSISTED, HAND-OUT PERSON WHO HEARS ABOUT IT, BRINGING THE TOWN TO IT'S KNEES WITH POVERTY. HOW CAN THE CITY LEADERS AND COUNCIL THINK ON SUCH RADICAL TERMS? THEY PURSUE CULTURE AT THE SAME TIME THEY ARE PURSUING POVERTY.

Voice- "Here's another general observation: A number of people seem to want less government and lower taxes, but in the next breath look to government to solve the problem and "bring jobs" to town. This is what people clamor for when they don't have marketable skills and aren't willing to invest in themselves. Blaming city leaders for not bringing jobs to town makes you smell like a rotten socialist, and from what I've gathered there are few, if any, of those on this forum"

AND EXACTLY WHY WOULDN'T WE EXPECT THE CITY LEADERS TO BRING JOBS (DECENT-NOT LOW WAGE) JOBS TO TOWN? ISN'T THAT THE FUNCTION OF THE ECON. DEV. DEPARTMENT, VOICE? IF NOT, WHY DOES THE CITY NEED THIS DEPARTMENT? WHO ELSE WOULD BE WORKING ON BRINGING JOBS TO TOWN, THE CITIZENS? I'M NOT A SOCIALIST, BUT I DO EXPECT MY CITY LEADERS TO DO THEIR DAM JOBS, ESPECIALLY THE ECON. DEV. DEPT.

Voice- "Given the lack of educational attainment, on average, in Middletown, there won't be any high-tech, high-paying jobs that arrive here anytime soon. About the only thing a lot of people in Middletown are qualified to do is work jobs that barely rise above minimum wage, and there's no amount of cajoling with outside business interests that any city leader can do to change that".

YEAH BUT WE CAN BLAME THE 70's, 80's, AND 90's CITY LEADERS FROM THE PAST, WHEN THE PAPER MILLS WERE FOLDING AND AK WAS GOING DOWN THE TOILET AND DOWNSIZING. ALL OF THEM SHOULD HAVE SEEN THE CHANGE IN THE TOWN EMPLOYMENT CLIMATE AND STARTED PREPARING TO DIVERT THE JOB SCENE TO EMPLOYABLE VENUES OTHER THAN PAPER AND STEEL. THE PEOPLE IN MIDDLETOWN BEING QUALIFIED TO DO MINIMUM WAGE JOBS IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE SCHOOL SYSTEM GOING DOWN THE TOILET SINCE THE 60's WHEN IT WAS RESPECTABLE IN PERFORMANCE. TO BE FAIR TO THE CURRENT SCHOOL PERFORMANCE, THE CITY HASN'T HELPED DUMPING ALL THEIR SECTION 8 CRAP AND ALL THAT GOES WITH IT IN THEIR LAP. THE CITY'S NEED FOR REVENUE THROUGH HUD MONEY HANDOUTS HASN'T DONE THE SCHOOLS ANY FAVORS. INCREDIBLY, THE CITY LEADERS DON'T APPEAR TO CARE WHAT DAMAGE THEY HAVE CAUSED TO THE SCHOOLS. SELFISH AGENDA. IF THE CITY LEADERS WOULD PLACE AS MUCH IMPORTANCE ON JOB CREATION AS THEY DO ON FAKE GAS LIGHTS, CHIPPED PAINT ON HOUSES, RUSTY GUTTERS, THE ARTZY CROWD DESIRES AND KISSING THE A-- OF THE MMF PEOPLE, WE MAY HAVE BEEN UP THE ROAD FURTHER IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF THIS TOWN. THEIR PRIORITIES ARE ALL SCREWED UP AS TO WHAT THIS TOWN REALLY NEEDS.

Voice- "how about we simply raise the bar for acceptable housing and road conditions"?

HOW ARE WE GONNA DO THAT IF THE CITY KEEPS INVITING SLUMLORDS AND ACCEPTING THE DUMPS THEY OWN? HOW ARE WE GONNA RAISE THE BAR ON ROAD CONDITIONS IF THE CITY WON'T RETURN THE MONEY THEY "BORROWED" FROM THE ROAD FUND AND PLACED IN THE GENERAL FUND WAY BACK IN THE 80's? THEY NEVER RETURNED THE MONEY TO THE STREET FUND SINCE THEN. THEY HAVEN'T HAD A COMPREHENSIVE STREET PREV. MAINT. PLAN IN OVER THREE DECADES. IMO, VOICE, IT WOULD BE WRONG TO NOT BLAME THEM NOR HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE SCREWUPS SINCE THE 70's. THERE IS NO DEFENSE FOR THEIR INCOMPETENT ACTIONS AND LACK OF VISION FOR THE CITY.

Voice- "We've got more than our fair share of poor people; maybe we'd get some peole with money and means to move to here if we had nice streets and strict zoning requirements".

WHEN YOU FIGURE OUT HOW TO ATTRACT SOME CLASSY PEOPLE WITH MONEY TO TOWN, PLEASE LET US KNOW. I WOULD IMAGINE PEOPLE WITH MONEY AND CLASS WOULD RATHER LIVE IN A COMMUNITY THAT OFFERS A LIFESTYLE RELATED TO MONEY AND CLASS RATHER THAN MIDDLETOWN, A TOWN WITH LITTLE CLASS NOR PEOPLE WITH MONEY. NICER STREETS AND STRICTER ZONING JUST AIN'T ENOUGH. GOT TO PURGE THE OVER ABUNDANCE OF LOWER INCOME AND GET RID OF THE "GHETTO LOOK" INHERENT IN THIS TOWN NOW. TOO MANY AREAS THAT LOOK LIKE THE INNER WEST SIDE OF DAYTON AROUND THIRD ST.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.102 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information