Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Friday, March 29, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tonights City Council Meeting
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tonights City Council Meeting

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
randy View Drop Down
MUSA Official
MUSA Official
Avatar

Joined: Jan 13 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1586
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote randy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Tonights City Council Meeting
    Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 5:37pm
Unfortunately I can not make tonights meeting, nor am I at a place I can watch it live tonight. So any updates that people can give tonight would be great.
Call me for a www.CameraSecurityNow.com quote 513-422-1907 x357
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 7:30pm

Bravo to Mr. Laubach!!!  He hit on the heart of the matter!!!

With both this sign ordinance and the Draconian “Historic Ordinance”, Kohler is attempting to craft legislation that allows him to do whatever he wants to do, according to his subjective opinions!!!

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 8:15pm

The Law Director stated that “Marty” had “drafted” portions of the sign legislation to put in what “he wanted”!!! What the heck is “Marty” doing drafting legislation and what the heck does it matter what “Marty” wants???

The drafting of legislation is the Law Director’s job. If he can’t do it, fire him and hire someone who can do it.

All legislation should be drafting with the aim of being as fair and uniform as possible, and should NOT be slanted towards what “Marty” or any other special interest wants!!!

Nor should it be drafted to allow any individual to selectively enforce the legislation’s mandates according to whim or subjective opinions.

It is time for both Landen and “Marty” to be shown the door!!!

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
PattiGal View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Sep 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 113
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PattiGal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 8:17pm
Were you there, Mike?
"Because nice matters..."
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 8:20pm
Originally posted by PattiGal PattiGal wrote:

Were you there, Mike?
PattiGal,
No, but I watched it on TVMiddletown.
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 10:12pm
The City Law Director, regarding signs at tonight's city council meeting:
"Right now, if we have a sign, no matter how ugly it is, if it is fallen down, run over and mangled by a bulldozer, we have no means of dealing with it!"
Of course we do, Mr. Law Director!!!
We simply refer it to the non-existent Middletown Historic Commission and they declare it a work of art!!! LOL LOL LOL
 
Why are we so worried about a few perfectly sound sign structures that currently happen to be waiting on a new obusiness to put up a new sign panel, yet we celebrate it when one of the "it" crowd puts JUNK auto hoods up in the air on a downtown building???
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 04 2011 at 10:22pm
Mr. Robinson: Here's a suggestion:
 
Get a couple of junk auto hoods, have a local "graffiti artist" spray paint: "Visit PAC Middletown" on them, and then temporarily put them on your "obsolete" sign structure!!!
 
That way, EVERYBODY WINS!!!  The non-existent Historic Commission will have to declare it "Art"; Verdin will get some free advertising; The City will have to stay off of your butt since the sign is no longer obsolete and you are actually performing a public service by promoting downtown Middletown; and when you are actually ready to put up a new sign panel, the graffiti artist will have a piece of "art" that he can SELL to Verdin!!!  Big%20smile
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 6:29am
Mike- ya just can't script it any better than this. The comedy writers for Two and a Half Men would be jealous. I believe we have Middletown's version of the 60's show Laugh-In. Or, we have just created a new day time soap opera, The Days Of Our Lives In Middletown or As The World of Marty and Leslie Turn. Not a clue about how to run a city with any logic or competence- none of them. Great comedy and it's all free for us to watch!
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 7:01am
From today's Journal:

As members debated the need for a change to sign ordinance language, Councilman A.J. Smith suggested the real issue was whether Middletown has adequate leadership from its administrators. He questioned the direction staff has taken regarding the Section 8 voucher program and branch campus plans with Cincinnati State Technical and Community College — and said it may be time for a staff change.

“If we are going to look at a change of direction and being fair ... maybe we should look at a reorganization of our leadership,” he said. I'll go one step further AJ.....not MAYBE.....the "reorganization" of city leadership should start with the city manager and proceed on down through the ranks at the city building. The "reorganization" should be renamed "downsizing and cleaning out the deadwood" with a total replacement of key city leaders who exhibit a new direction for the city. Council could/should make that happen if they cared for this city. The current crop is bad for the health of this town. We will never recover until we eliminate the people who put us in this situation.


Laubach said he felt staff was spending too much time trying to make things “nice and pretty” in Middletown instead of dealing with more important problems. BINGO MR. Laubach!!! Is the rest of council going to open their mouths to support this? What is the matter with you Picard, Mulligan, Becker and Allen? Say something- anything. Commit.

However, Economic Development Director Mike Robinette argued the sign ordinance and its enforcement is a necessary tool to improve the city’s appearance and draw businesses. Silly, non-important statement Mr. Robinette. No, the necessary tool to drawing business is to invite them in, ask what can we do for you/how can we help you get established, supply them with business location choices, lower the taxes for them to rock bottom until they establish themselves and are drawing a profit- then pro-rate the taxes based on business success so as not to put them out of business. Help them grow instead of crushing them before they build their business. All of this "sign talk" comes after the fact. Fill the stores and assure the businesses are on sound operational ground- then concentrate on the minor things like signage WITHOUT the Gestapo tactics currently being employed by Kohler and Landen. Knock it off boys. Too much time spent on sign talk and not enough time spent on occupancy of vacant stores in town. You have it backward.

She (Ms. Scott-Jones) also agreed with Laubach there were more pressing issues. Amen. Nice to see we have some people on council who show some logical thinking. What's wrong with the rest of you?

“I would be more concerned with filling the buildings and filling the spaces than removing signs at this point,” she said. A second BINGO for Ms. Scott- Jones!!!
Back to Top
Molly View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Molly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 7:51am
I was at the meeting last night. The sign legislation should be called the "Anti Lenny Robinson, New Business" legislation.  It was strange for the city manager to cut off Marty even before he spoke and then for Mr. Robinette to push Marty aside so that he could "save the day"! That didn't work out well for them. Josh had good points last evening but the highlight for me was the look on the city manager's face when AJ made his comment about the administration...Priceless!Clap
Back to Top
randy View Drop Down
MUSA Official
MUSA Official
Avatar

Joined: Jan 13 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1586
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote randy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 8:24am
I missed it !!!! :(
Call me for a www.CameraSecurityNow.com quote 513-422-1907 x357
Back to Top
LMAO View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Oct 28 2009
Location: Middletucky
Status: Offline
Points: 468
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LMAO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 10:40am
Have to agree with the other poster,Time to show Marty and Les the door.I say it would be a safe bet that neither one of them got much sleep last night.They didnt get their way in writing their own law.LOL
Back to Top
Smackdown View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Smackdown Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 2:34pm
Landen got a "smackdown" from Picard very nicely played. Not rude, but the message was loud and clear. ASJ took notes about the $25,000. NOT spent on the building project to save the Thatcher estate and the 'boy toy" appeasement. take note where that $25,000. appears somewhere. Now that the Manchester has closed, how does Cincinnati State intend to operate a business that could not sustain itself?
 
The sign ordinance is such a waste of time. The unconstitutionality Rupert referred was associated with ambiquity. So Landen has to retain a Columbus attorney to help him write a non ambiguous sign ordinance and this has the highest priority? To who...Neyer?
 
Landen pushing hard on the rewrite of the silly ordinance while saying council could pull back. Note to council: pull back, more important things to tend to than making Neyer and the Atrium happy. I'd rather have those semi's out  of town in front of the parking lot where Dillman's and the old KMart are, that's a larger eyesore, than this absolutely dumb haggling over a sign ordinance which serves to annoy Robinson.
 
Unfortunately, no firings. It will pass 4-3.    
 
 
Back to Top
Vivian Moon View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council


Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 5:59pm

Smackdown

The smackdown was priceless.

I was driving down University Blvd
today looked over and saw the old Cambridge Inn that has been closed for about 20 years….and right out front was a big empty sign.
Hmmm…..In 20 years why hasn’t the city required the removal of this sign?
Why is it that the City ONLY seems concerned about ONE sign located on the other side of I75?

The buildings that were purchased for
Cincy State were paid for from the Downtown Fund. Last month City Council authorized $500,000 from this fund for the purchase of ALL the building needed by City State
. This amount included the purchase of the Manchester Inn.
I believe the day a business closes its doors the value of the business is reduced by 50%. So as of today what is the real value of the Manchester Inn?
But the really big question is how long will the Manchester Inn sit empty and then what will the City dododo?

 
Back to Top
Smackdown View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Smackdown Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 6:28pm
Vivian, I believe it is also unconstitution to unequally apply law to selectively targeted individuals, groups, and races. The city ordinances are vague in many readings, including 2910 in particular. It includes the tax section which is also unconstitutional in many sections. Middletown cannot do what the state does not require nor federal government. Interesting Mr. Landen expressed "terrified" when discussing case law in other municipalities. Perhaps speaking about the horror associated with many aspects of the city ordinances filled with ambiguity and holes, rendering it unconstitutional.
 
Better re-write many chapters that would be challenged, than the effort expended on re-crafting "sign" lnaguage. 
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 6:32pm

Well, at least Middletown finally has a “SHOVEL READY Project”!!!

After what Landen, Kohler, and Robinette were spewing about signs last night, council chambers is definitely READY for some SHOVELS!!! LOL LOL LOL

Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 8:18pm
I've missed the details of the city's beef with Lenny R.  I know there's the property vacating issue but which signage are we talking about?
Back to Top
409 View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Mar 27 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 409 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 8:29pm
The old Score sign at SR122 & I-75 is one issue.
Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 9:01pm
Signs, schmeins, another odd looking thing are those brick model homes at the end of Commerce Dr.
Back to Top
swohio75 View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jun 13 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 820
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote swohio75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 05 2011 at 11:54pm
Originally posted by Smackdown Smackdown wrote:

Landen got a "smackdown" from Picard very nicely played. Not rude, but the message was loud and clear. ASJ took notes about the $25,000. NOT spent on the building project to save the Thatcher estate and the 'boy toy" appeasement. take note where that $25,000. appears somewhere.


She asked what happens to the $25,000 difference between purchase price and amount authorized. City Manager stated the $25,000 remains in the Downtown Fund.

If the $25,000 is to be spent for something else, won't it need to be authorized by Council?
Back to Top
Smackdown View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Smackdown Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 06 2011 at 1:43pm
If the "downtown" fund was authorized for the full amount, would not the $25,000. be returned to the General Fund/ If not, and it remains, why would council need to re-authorize its expenditure, as it was approved. Really don't know. Assumption was ASJ was keeping her eyes on where the $25,000 might end up, but probably will be carried over to the Manchester expenditure.  
Back to Top
swohio75 View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jun 13 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 820
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote swohio75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 06 2011 at 2:43pm
Why would it go to the General Fund?
 
Council would need to reauthorize because it was approved for the purchase of specific real estate. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information