Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
Thursday, April 25, 2024 |
|
Adkins vs. landlords |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||||
TudorBrown
MUSA Citizen Joined: Aug 24 2009 Location: Highlands D. Status: Offline Points: 265 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May 28 2012 at 4:03pm |
|||
|
||||
greygoose
MUSA Resident Joined: May 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
TonyB,
There are laws in place. The problem is that the city can't utilize them because that can't "serve" out of town landlords (code violations) or banks (foreclosed, vacant, properties). The proposed registration is the "tool" that they need to force these land owners (including banks) to be responsible and maintain their properties. If the landowner refuses to register, the proposed ordinance will allow the city to impose penalties for non-compliance. If the penalties are ignored and become deliquent, the city can lien the property. After a period of time and due diligence has been followed, the city will have the ability to seize the property. The "idea" of government seizing someone elses property doesn't sound right on the surface, but, in my opinion, it protects those of us that are complying with housing codes, and are paying our taxes. It's offensive to me to know that large, out of town banks can and are skirting the local ordinances and are getting away with it. It is also offensive to think that an out of state landlord can ignore the rules that we have to play by. As you stated, "responsible citizenship is in everyone's best interest". This is the city's way of compeling individuals (and banks) to be responsible. |
||||
TonyB
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
greygoose,
That is an interesting premise and I really have only one question about it; are there no laws currently on the books that hold irresponsible landlords accountable? Your statement seems to imply that there are not. If only one in seven currently register with the county, how do you expect that the city will do better? Does the county have any recourse to compel landlords to register? Is the city going to seize property from those who don't comply? Once again, where is the balance between government regulation and private property ownership? Responsible citizenship is in everyone's best interest; how are you going to compel individuals to be responsible? |
||||
greygoose
MUSA Resident Joined: May 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
TonyB,
Based on the videos that I have watched, the articles that I have read, and the many questions that I have asked on this subject, the primary "driver" behind the registration concept is to gain the legal tools needed to hold "out of town" property owners (including banks) accountable for their vacant and rental properties. Without the registration process, the city doesn't have the legal leverage it needs to serve notice on these irresponsible property owners. The city is losing a huge amount in potential tax revenues and doesn't, at this time, have the legal means to do anything about it. I have heard the argument that we landlords are already required to register our properties with the county, but if you check into it, you will discover that only 1 in about every 7 rental properties is actually registered. Constitutionally, you can't single out only "out of town" property owners to comply with the regulations, thus the requirement falls on all of us. As a "local" landlord, I recognize that this new regulation will cost me money, but I feel that it is a small price to pay if it allows the city to take control of the blighted properties that are so prevalent in our community. If Mr. Adkins' strategy is correct (and I think that it is), both the city and its responsible landlords win! |
||||
Bill
MUSA Citizen Joined: Nov 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 710 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Speaking of NSP, where has Nelson Self gone?
|
||||
greygoose
MUSA Resident Joined: May 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
acclaro,
Although I am not necessarily in agreement with your conclusions, your post was very informative. However, can you further explain your claim that the city doesn't wish to comply with HUD and NSP guidlines? As a landlord, I have seen a concerted effort in recent months to better comply with HUD regulations. The MPHA inspections are more stringent than they have ever been. In addition, I have a personal friend that is involved with Middletown's NSP efforts and I am told that the city is following the guidelines "strictly by the book". Can you provide some detail to support your HUD/NSP related statement? In conclusion, I agree that the historical decisions of our city government has left much to be desired. However, is it fair to hold current administrators accountable for the mistakes of their predecessors? If anything, the prior mistakes make their jobs more difficult. In my opinion, they deserve the benefit of a doubt until their decisions and/or policies are "proven" wrong. |
||||
TonyB
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
greygoose,
It never seems unreasonable when it's someone else's money!!! If they get away with this, next they'll want the property owners to pay to pave their street; oh, wait; they already have done that! |
||||
acclaro
Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Rather ironic the city doesn't wish to comply with HUD and NSP guidelines and diverst fed money to areas not entitled, but over-regulates the landlords. It isn't 25.00/ property, its 25.00 per unit, including the tendants, so they can also try to collect tax revenue.
Middletown just wants the cash, nothing else. Adkins already building an empire, he needs to be put in check, and his reign pulled back. Adding more staff for his span of control doesn't provide a reason for this greatly over-reaching effort disguised to control Section 8 and housing. What happened to all the effort he made a few years ago to give other cities and the residents credit to take their voucher elsewhere? Neither the tenant nor the cities wanted them----period. Quit blaming those in need. It isn't Section 8 people who are deplorable, its the city that has used them for the 10% processing fee the city earms $ Mm on annually, and that is why Section 8 is going noweher. This other over-zealous regulatory attempt is nothing but an attempt to grow the cash cow to a richer cash cow. It has nothing to do with eliminating it. Sorry sj, disagree with Adkins motives, and know this city too well to ever believe there is a strategic thrust behind this. There isn't other than making more $$$ for the Mm $$$ from the processing fee city takes. And you wonder why there aren't buyers for homes in Middletown? Its called city council, city leadership, feed the beast, and taxes, taxes, taxes. |
||||
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill
|
||||
greygoose
MUSA Resident Joined: May 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I agree. Why are the landlords so upset? If they do what they are supposed to do, the expense to them is only $25 per property. A reputable landlord shouldn't have an issue with this.
|
||||
LMAO
MUSA Citizen Joined: Oct 28 2009 Location: Middletucky Status: Offline Points: 468 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Already have a couple that lives like 3 doors down from my renters.Of course they are both on Section 8.Renters mentioned to me MPD ought to put a sub station close by cos there at one or the other everyday.
|
||||
Bocephus
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 838 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
So if I win the lottery or become suddenly rich I will just buy a few houses that are being forclosed on in a few neighborhoods that are more expensive and rent them out for cheap to extra large families that other wise couldn't afford it ? I think that would be fair and yes I would make sure that I bought a few by our great city leaders too.
|
||||
TudorBrown
MUSA Citizen Joined: Aug 24 2009 Location: Highlands D. Status: Offline Points: 265 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Shouldn't you be placing blame on the section 8 program, and government than? The landlords would be fools not to take advantage of section 8 money as long as it is available. |
||||
Bocephus
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 838 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
How would some of these "landlords" like it if scum bags started moving in all around them with loud music and drunks outside all summer long and watching people go in and out of the house next door to you all day and part of the night ? Then come tell us how what you think of it? Oh no you wont see it because they live in nicer areas where they dont have any section 8.
|
||||
TudorBrown
MUSA Citizen Joined: Aug 24 2009 Location: Highlands D. Status: Offline Points: 265 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I know how you feel, but they're generally not getting these properties for one penny less than they're worth. In a lot of cases these properties are offered to owner occupants first, and when no one bites they're offered to investors and a bidding war usually ensues. |
||||
LMAO
MUSA Citizen Joined: Oct 28 2009 Location: Middletucky Status: Offline Points: 468 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I "WONT" register my houses.I dont care what they pass.My renters our good renters and I have never been draged in the "KANGAROO" court they hold down at the city building.I dont tell them how to run there Section 8 housing so why should I allow them to stick there nose into my houses?
|
||||
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
When did the real estate investment people of
Why does the City of The City has made the downtown a ghost town because of their need to control and unreasonable demands and now they want a stranglehold on the rest of How many more empty buildings and houses do we need in this town? The City can’t talk care of the property they already own. Yep this is all about fees and fines and feeding the BEAST |
||||
TonyB
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
M29,
Is the issue inspections or requirements? Where's the balance between safe housing and government control? How many fees, surcharges, hidden taxes is it going to take to fund government oversight of the ownership of property? Other posts here also have questions about who landlords rent property to; will that be another fee? Think that landlord isn't going to just pass that cost right to the renter of the property? How many layers of government are required to enforce current laws? What is the rest of that registration fee to be used for besides "inspection costs"? |
||||
Middletown29
MUSA Citizen Joined: Mar 30 2011 Status: Offline Points: 474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
TonyB
The issue is inspection of rental property. The way you implement an inspection program is to require they be registered. The registration fee is used to cover part of the inspection cost. |
||||
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Gentlemen
This has NOTHING to do with any HUD program or Section 8…and by the way Mr Adkins has NOT reduced the Section 8 vouchers program. This is about charging to inspect each and every piece of rental property in Middletown no matter how large or small. This is about the City and Mr Adkins wanting control and power over privatey owned property. The City already has laws on the books to deal with any rental property problems. Take a look around the City at all the property that the City now owns and tell me why they won’t clean up their own property before making demands on the citizens. Tell me again how well they used the millions of dollars in NSP and CDBG funds. I can tell you where it wasn’t used….It wasn’t used in the high poverty high crime areas. This is all about money and power…..This is about feeding the BEAST called City Hall. |
||||
Bocephus
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 838 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
If I could sell the house I own I would just move out like most other people seem to have done.You all are right,the city caused a huge influx of poverty but greedy (not all) landlords are just happy with buying houses for nothing and renting them out to the 1st drug addict or drunkard with a section 8 just to grow their bank accounts. So if I could afford to buy the properties that are cheap in my neighborhood I probably would instead move to another town.
|
||||
Rhodes
MUSA Resident Joined: Jun 18 2010 Status: Offline Points: 209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Apparently some on here do not know how to estimate $25 per unit. It does add up to a lot of money.
These properties are already zoned, there is no need to register them again. The city caused the influx of poverty in the city. It's not the responsibility of a landlord to control the behavior of a tenant. It doesn't matter how cheap they buy a property. If properties are selling cheap in your neighborhood, then buy some yourself until the market turns around. |
||||
TonyB
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
M29,
No one said anything about unfettered capitalism. I'm talking about yet another layer of government red tape. How many places do these rental units need to be "registered"? I take it the county level isn't good enough for you? Why not add registration fees based on which street in town, whether there are "too many" rental houses in an area, or who has the Section 8 properties? As Mr. Saunders correctly points out, what are you getting for your "registration fee"? |
||||
Richard Saunders
MUSA Resident Joined: Jun 30 2010 Status: Offline Points: 232 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Something is very wrong here. I was told after a recent meeting of landlords that the $25 fee will be due every time a unit becomes vacant, as well as yearly.
Federal laws force landlords to rent to nearly anyone who initially has the money whether they want them for a tenant or not, so for some units this may cost the landlord $50 or $100 per year, per unit. If they have several units, this could easily run up to thousands of dollars per year. What does the landlord get in return? Nothing but more hassles...unless they are friends of city hall, then this will be no big deal and will cost them next to nothing. (Before you doubt me, think about Adkins and his new gang of motorized rental property storm troopers. Someone will have to pay for these gestapos, and their new vehicles. It certainly won't be CDBG dollars, those are now pledged to HEP to cover the loan for Cincinnati State. It will have to come from them "finding" some sort of "violations" so that they can collect fines.)
|
||||
Bocephus
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 838 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
You may be one of the few,Im just not too happy with a few of them close to my house I would sell out and move but Im so upside down its not feasible. Maybe I should have just walked away like a lot of other people have done. |
||||
LMAO
MUSA Citizen Joined: Oct 28 2009 Location: Middletucky Status: Offline Points: 468 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I own more then one.Probaly,one of th few that doesnt have section 8 renters.I refuse to go through that route.
Its hard to believe I guess that there are a few of us that are good landlords.
|
||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |