Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Friday, May 17, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Obama Admin Not Business Friendly
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Obama Admin Not Business Friendly

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Obama Admin Not Business Friendly
    Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 2:53pm
To All My Valued Employees,
 
There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn't pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job; however, is the changing political landscape in this country.
 
However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interests.
 
First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner there is a back story. This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Mercedes outside. You've seen my big home at last year's Christmas party. I'm sure all these flashy icons of luxury conjure up some idealized thoughts about my life.
 
However, what you don't see is the back story.
 
I started this company 28 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 300 square foot studio apartment for 3 years. My entire living apartment was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you.
 
My diet consisted of Ramen Pride noodles because every dollar I spent went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a defective transmission. I didn't have time to date. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business -- hard work, discipline, and sacrifice.
 
Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a modest $50K a year and spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the Nordstrom's for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the discount store extracting any clothing item that didn't look like it was birthed in the 70's. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had.
 
So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9am, mentally check in at about noon, and then leave at 5pm, I don't. There is no "off" button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat, and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to my hip like a 1 year old special-needs child. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden -- the nice house, the Mercedes, the vacations... You never realize the back story and the sacrifices I've made.
 
Now, the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed a decade of my life for.
 
 
 
Yes, business ownership has is benefits but the price I've paid is steep and not without wounds.
 
Unfortunately, the cost of running this business, and employing you, is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why:
 
I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don't pay enough. I have state taxes. Federal taxes. Property taxes. Sales and use taxes. Payroll taxes. Workers compensation taxes. Unemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a tax man to manage all these taxes and then guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him. Government mandates and regulations and all the accounting that goes with it, now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a check to the US Treasury for $288,000 for quarterly taxes. You know what my "stimulus" check was? Zero. Nada. Zilch.
 
The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or, the single mother sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare check? Obviously, government feels the latter is the economic stimulus of this country.
 
The fact is, if I deducted (Read: Stole) 50% of your paycheck you'd quit and you wouldn't work here. I mean, why should you? That's nuts. Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree which is why your job is in jeopardy.
 
Here is what many of you don't understand ... to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had suddenly government mandated to me that I didn't need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000 into the Washington black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees, and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now.
 
When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don't defibrillate and shock his thumb thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or, do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it. Suddenly, the power brokers in Washington believe the poor of America are the essential drivers of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change you can keep.
 
So where am I going with all this?
 
It's quite simple.
 
If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I fire you. I fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your SUV, and your child's future. Frankly, it isn't my problem any more.
 
 
 
Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I'm done. I'm done with a country that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, will be my citizenship.
 
So, if you lose your job, it won't be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country, steamrolled the constitution, and will have changed its landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about....
 
Signed, Your boss
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 12:58pm
Pacman- I understand your viewpoints being a small business owner. I agree that the policies should support the growth of small/large businesses. I also agree that if policies are made to cater to union desires, that it hurts all employers, both large and small and hurts Ohio in attracting new business. I have been employed for both large and small companies over my 40 years of working. None have been with union shops. I have witnessed some fairly unscrupulous employer behavior over the years to the workers in these non-union shops. Some employees are certainly guilty of some poor actions against the employer also. We have talked about the employer rights. We have talked about policies that support the unions in the workplace. What about worker rights in the non-union workplace? Is the only solution to quit when things go wrong between employer/employee in a non-union shop or should the non-union employee have some rights also? Shouldn't we have some policies to address this situation? What's your opinion as an employer?
Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 12:35pm
Obama Strikes again:
 
These actions will hurt states like Ohio that are so layden and tied to Unions,  Businesses will look to locate in states where the Unions don't play such a big role.  Like the South.
 
Obama also used the occasion at the White House to announce formally a new White House task force on the problems of middle-class Americans. He named Vice President Joe Biden as its chairman.

Union officials say the new orders by Obama will undo Bush administration policies that favored employers over workers. The orders will:

_Require federal contractors to offer jobs to current workers when contracts change.

_Reverse a Bush administration order requiring federal contractors to post notice that workers can limit financial support of unions serving as their exclusive bargaining representatives.

_Prevent federal contractors from being reimbursed for expenses meant to influence workers deciding whether to form a union and engage in collective bargaining.

"We need to level the playing field for workers and the unions that represent their interests," Obama said during a signing ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

"I do not view the labor movement as part of the problem. To me, it's part of the solution," he said. "You cannot have a strong middle class without a strong labor movement."

Signing the executive orders was Obama's second overture to organized labor in as many days. On Thursday, he signed the first bill of his presidency, giving workers more time to sue for wage discrimination.

Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 11:22am

Vet I look at Obama and His admin as currently making knee Jerk reaction decisions which are going to come back and haunt him.

Going on Al Arabiya TV for his First TV appearanceThumbs%20Down and the next day getting a thumb in the eye from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad demanding an apology and for the USA to abandon Israel.  Today we have Castro demanding the return of Gitmo to Cuba.  Chavez must be waiting in the wings and lets not forget Kim Jong-il,  Granted these are all Nut cases but I think Obama is being perceived as weak.
 
Closing Gitmo with no clue as to what to do with the detainees.
 
Pushing thru a Stimulus package with to many PORK and BS programs which do nothing to stimulate the creation of Jobs.
 
Another knee jerk decision is the one above to go from a 180 days Statute of Limitations to 10 year or more is nuts.  The whole idea is to create jobs and not throw obstacles in the way. 
 
 
 
Back to Top
John Beagle View Drop Down
MUSA Official
MUSA Official
Avatar

Joined: Apr 23 2007
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1855
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John Beagle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 11:17am
I would have to say that is a disincentive for some businesses to stay in the US.
John Beagle

Middletown USA

News of, for and by the people of Middletown, Ohio.
Back to Top
Middletown News View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen


Joined: Apr 29 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Middletown News Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 10:20am
Employees may sue you for an allegedly discriminatory pay decision made 10 years ago because the pay they receive today was allegedly affected by that 10-year old decision. 
 
Now how is that supposed to attract new business to our country?
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 9:15am
Pacman- prior to this being signed, it wasn't worker friendly. So, where do we compromise? What's the answer for both worker and business person? As a business person, what would you like to see happen?
Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 9:08am
 
New Changes in Labor Laws
 
In what will likely be the first of many labor and employment laws enacted under the new administration, President Obama has signed today the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009.  The law is a response to the 2007 United States Supreme Court decision of Ledbetter v Goodyear.  In this case, the Court held that the statute of limitations for filing pay discrimination claims under Title VII begins to run on the date of the first discriminatory pay decision.  Ms. Ledbetter's claim was time barred because the first allegedly discriminatory pay decision was made years before she filed a charge with the EEOC. 
 
The New Law
The new law reverses the Ledbetter decision.  In short, the new law provides that, regarding discriminatory compensation practices, an unlawful employment practice can occur each time an employee is paid if the employee is affected by application of that prior discriminatory compensation practice.  Each time an employee is paid, a new statute of limitations begins to run.  Note that although the Ledbetter decision arose under Title VII, the new act also applies to claims of pay discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Rehabilitation Act.
 
What Does This Mean for You? 
In essence, employers lose the protection of a reasonable statute of limitations.  Employees may sue you for an allegedly discriminatory pay decision made 10 years ago because the pay they receive today was allegedly affected by that 10-year old decision.  While an employee can only recover monetarily for discrimination occurring up to two years prior to the filing a of charge, the employer must try to defend itself for decisions that possibly were made years earlier, long after evidence may exist or witnesses can be located.
 
What Should You Do? 
How can you protect yourself against these lawsuits that may be filed years after a decision is made?  Here is how:
·           Use written performance evaluations to document your decisions regarding compensation, but make sure the evaluations are honest, objective and meaningful
·           Use written performance management forms (e.g., written warnings, performance management plans) to document issues with employee performance. 
 
Importantly, train supervisors in the law and the proper use of human resource tools, such as annual evaluations or other performance management documents and systems.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.070 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information