Print Page | Close Window

SB 5 Petition Signatures

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown Community
Forum Name: Middletown News, Info and Happenings
Forum Description: Discuss any Middletown Ohio area news story.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3980
Printed Date: May 31 2024 at 9:56pm


Topic: SB 5 Petition Signatures
Posted By: VietVet
Subject: SB 5 Petition Signatures
Date Posted: Jul 07 2011 at 6:38am
Today's Journal.....

County to start counting signatures to repeal SB 5

HAMILTON — Butler County Board of Elections staff will put in overtime this week and next to verify the 22,000 signatures on the petitions to repeal Senate Bill 5.

“It affects a whole lot of people,” said Tony Fink, vice president of IAFF Middletown Firefighters Local 336. “You want every individual teacher, every individual firefighter, every individual policeman to negotiate their own salary.”

YES TONY FINK....WE WANT ALL OF YOU TO NEGOTIATE YOUR SALARY BASED ON YOUR EXPERIENCE, YOUR PAST CONTRIBUTIONS, YOUR VALUE TO THE DEPARTMENT,A MERIT SYSTEM MEASURING YOUR PERFORMANCE AND THE MANY OTHER THINGS THAT DETERMINE ONE'S SALARY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR. WE DO NOT WANT CONTRACTS SIGNED BETWEEN YOU AND YOUR EMPLOYER (THE CITY-IE. THE TAXPAYER) YEARS IN ADVANCE FOR WORK THAT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FUTURE. YOU GET PAID FOR WORK ALREADY DONE, NOT PROPOSED WORK IN THE FUTURE. IS TONY'S THINKING HERE TYPICAL UNION REASONING? IF SO, I WOULD SUSPECT NOT IN TUNE WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE WORKING WORLD.

With more than fives times the required signatures collected, the ballot initiative likely will make it on the November ballot. If it does and the legislation is repealed, Hamilton Classroom Teachers Association President Debi Gann said that will send a loud message to Kasich and the Ohio General Assembly.

“He is basically blaming public employees for a recession we didn’t create,” she said. “I don’t think he thought about all those people that provide those services of how important we are to the community.”

DEBI GANN.....RECESSION OR NOT, KASICH OR NOT, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, WHERE UNION NEGOTIATIONS PRODUCE CONTRACTS YEARS IN ADVANCE WITH PAY RAISES PRE-DETERMINED FOR WORK THAT HASN'T BEEN ACCOMPLISHED AS YET, NO MERIT SYSTEM IN PLACE TO EVALUATE THE JOB PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ARE DOING, STEP PAY INCREASES IN BETWEEN THE REGULAR YEARLY INCREASE GIVING THE PUBLIC WORKER ESSENTIALLY TWO RAISES EACH YEAR, PAYING LESS FROM YOUR PAYCHECK FOR BENEFITS WHILE THE TAXPAYER PAYS THE DIFFERENCE FOR YOU IN PREMIUMS. AND THAT SAME TAXPAYER IS BEING ASKED TO PAY MORE FROM THEIR PAYCHECK TO HELP THEIR PRIVATE EMPLOYER OUT WITH THE COSTS, RECEIVING A DOUBLE WHAMMY FROM THE PAYCHECK IN PAYROLL TAXES FOR YOUR COSTS AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL COSTS TO THEM. ALL OF THIS, IS ERODING THE PRIVATE SECTOR PAYCHECK TO THE POINT OF BEING BROKE FROM PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK. TIME YOU AND YOUR UNION BUDDIES STARTED PAYING YOUR FAIR SHARE ON BENEFIT COSTS AND RETIREMENT FOR YOURSELF AND STOP BLEEDING THE NON-UNION WORKERS TO DEATH. YOU AND YOUR FELLOW PUBLIC WORKERS HAVE SIMPLY BECOME TOO EXPENSIVE TO SUPPORT WITH YOUR DEMANDS OVER THE YEARS, AS OUR NON-UNION PAYCHECKS HAVE SHRUNKEN IN BUYING POWER OVER THE YEARS. THE SH-- HAS NOW HIT THE FAN.....YOUR WORLD IS CHANGING.....AND YOU DON'T LIKE IT. THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM.





Replies:
Posted By: viper771
Date Posted: Jul 07 2011 at 7:37pm
I think unions have destoyed the US long enough..They were necessary at one time, but that time has passed.


Posted By: Middletown News
Date Posted: Jul 08 2011 at 3:30pm
Funny thing is the union will lose membership if SB5 recinded. What do I mean they will lose membership? Well, there is only so much money. Either cut benefits and or pay or cut membership.

SB5 is an attempt to control costs and keep more jobs in the long run. I know many folks have good intentions about SB5 but they are wrong about it. Killing SB5 will kill more private union jobs.

Wake up teachers, police and fire union workers. You are in a lose or lose even more situation. Your choice.

-------------
Please like our http://www.facebook.com/middletownusa" rel="nofollow - Middletown USA Facebook Page



Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Jul 08 2011 at 7:38pm
Jonathan you are correct in your above post...

I do not think most people realize that only 11.7% of workers in the USA are Unionized, according to 2011 statics from the BLS.

Of that 11.7% only 4.5% are public/government workers. This means that about 325 million + or - U.S. citizens are held hostage by the demands 7.6 million public service workers. The best thing that can happen to Ohio as far as recruiting more businesses and jobs is to become a "Right To Work State"

Many public service unions will lose members because many jurisdictions will be forced to lay off unionized workers due to the fact that in many cases they will have no choice.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 7:09am
Today's Journal....

Teachers' union president: SB 5 a step back in time

HAMILTON — Debra Gann has been a teacher for 27 years, but she aspired to the profession as a 12-year-old.

SB5 is aimed at teachers, firefighters and police officers because it takes away their right to bargain many issues, including working conditions and consequently the conditions in which children learn, Gann said.

THIS IS BULL GANN. YOUR REASONS ARE LAME. THE WORKING CONDITIONS OF TODAY ARE INFINITELY BETTER THAN THEY WERE BACK WHEN UNIONS NEEDED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TO NEGOTIATE. YOU ARE JUST TRYING TO HOLD ON TO THE GRAVY TRAIN YOU PEOPLE HAVE BEEN RIDING FOR DECADES. IT IS TIME TO START PAYING YOUR FAIR SHARE OF THE BENEFIT COSTS LIKE WE PRIVATE INDUSTRY PEOPLE MUST DO NOWADAYS, AND IT IS TIME TO START PAYING MORE INTO YOUR DAM RETIREMENT. STOP BREAKING THE BACKS OF THE TAXPAYERS WHO ARE FUNDING YOUR PERKS. FOR EXAMPLE....YOU ARE PAYING ~ 9% INTO YOUR BENEFITS COSTS. WE HAVE BEEN PAYING 15-20% FOR YEARS NOW. HOW ABOUT YOU PEOPLE PAYING THE SAME? WE JUST WANT A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD...NO MORE, NO LESS.

“It is needed to keep great teachers and get help for those who are struggling,” Gann said.

NO, STOP PROTECTING THE TEACHERS WHO ARE STRUGGLING AND DOWNSIZE THEM FOR PERFORMANCE ISSUES. PERFORMANCE ISSUE DOWNSIZING HAS BEEN HAPPENING IN THE PRIVATE WORLD FOR DECADES. IT HAS JUST NOW CAUGHT UP TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES AND THEY DON'T LIKE IT. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE UNION MENTALITY. YOU WANT TO PROTECT WEAK WORKERS AND KEEP THEM FEEDING AT THE GRAVY TABLE AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE. THAT'S CRAP.


Richard Packert, a Middletown Middle School eighth-grade teacher and president of the Southwestern Ohio Education Association, said he believes SB5 and Issue 2 is a direct attack on the middle class who have negotiated fair pay and better working conditions through the collective bargaining process.

“This is a direct attack on teachers, police and firefighters,” Packert said.

BULL MANURE PACKERT! IT IS A WAY TO STOP THE OUT-OF-CONTROL DEMANDS THAT THE UNIONS HAVE WORKED UP TO IN THE LAST 4 DECADES. IT IS A WAY TO GET THE WEIGHT OF THE UNION DEMANDS OFF THE BACK OF THE CASH STRAPPED CITIES AND STATES THAT CAN NO LONGER AFFORD YOUR DEMANDS. IT IS A WAY TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD BETWEEN UNION AND NON-UNION WORKERS AS TO BENEFIT COST SHARING WITH THE EMPLOYERS, POTENTIAL UNREASONABLE HOURLY PAY DEMANDS IN BAD ECONOMIC TIMES, MORE MONETARY INPUT INTO PUBLIC WORKER RETIREMENTS BY THE PUBLIC WORKER INSTEAD OF THE TAXPAYER, AND A WAY TO STOP THE BLEEDING IN THE BUDGETS OF LOCAL, STATE AND FED GOVERNMENTS. YOUR COSTS ARE THE MAJORITY OF THE BUDGET. WE CAN'T HAVE THAT ANY LONGER.


“Everything we do is geared around the classroom and educating children. That’s what it is all about,” Packert said. “We know the bargaining process is a give and take and we understand the financial situation that the board and district are facing.”

IF YOU UNDERSTAND PACKERT, WHY DON'T YOU WANT TO CONTRIBUTE MORE TO THE COST OF MAINTAINING YOUR PUBLIC POSITION? HAVEN'T HEARD AN OFFER TO PAY MORE INTO YOUR RETIREMENT OR BENEFITS COSTS, OR OFFER TO TAKE A VOLUNTARILY PAY FREEZE. TIME TO PAY THE PIPER, TAKE YOUR LICKS LIKE WE PRIVATE INDUSTRY PEOPLE HAVE HAD TO DO SINCE THE 80's.



Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 8:20am
Vet -
 
Your distaste for the public unions has been well documented on this blog. I appreciate your POV but your argument seems to always come around to "be like the private sector". From what I've read, you not only do not believe the arguments of the opponents of SB5, you don't care what those arguments are. It seem that your only concern is for those workers to "get screwed" just like everybody else. I just don't understand that.
 
If there is any doubt that workers, workers rights and the middle class in general are the target of these type of attacks on unions and bargaining, that doubt is rapidly fading. Everything that is happening around the country is the Republican attack on working men and women at the expense of the wealthy. From the limits on unions to attacks on voter registration and voting rights to wanting to tax the poor, the wealthy have perpetrated a class war against the working class. They have the propaganda spin machine (FOX News) running all out to convince Americans to vote for their own servitude.
 
If these ideas are allowed to sway the day, it won't be long until the middle class will be a thing of the past and we will have nothing but the ruling class and the poor. Then you'll see rights removed by edict and the poor left to die. We've already seen and heard first hand from the Republicans how they feel about health care, capital punishment and worker rights. Let's stop this before it starts and defeat SB5!!!


Posted By: Bocephus
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 9:20am
Originally posted by TonyB TonyB wrote:

Vet -
 
Your distaste for the public unions has been well documented on this blog. I appreciate your POV but your argument seems to always come around to "be like the private sector". From what I've read, you not only do not believe the arguments of the opponents of SB5, you don't care what those arguments are. It seem that your only concern is for those workers to "get screwed" just like everybody else. I just don't understand that.
 
If there is any doubt that workers, workers rights and the middle class in general are the target of these type of attacks on unions and bargaining, that doubt is rapidly fading. Everything that is happening around the country is the Republican attack on working men and women at the expense of the wealthy. From the limits on unions to attacks on voter registration and voting rights to wanting to tax the poor, the wealthy have perpetrated a class war against the working class. They have the propaganda spin machine (FOX News) running all out to convince Americans to vote for their own servitude.
 
If these ideas are allowed to sway the day, it won't be long until the middle class will be a thing of the past and we will have nothing but the ruling class and the poor. Then you'll see rights removed by edict and the poor left to die. We've already seen and heard first hand from the Republicans how they feel about health care, capital punishment and worker rights. Let's stop this before it starts and defeat SB5!!!
 
If your democrat comrades are so worried about working men and women of America then why did this President decide to stop deporting non criminal illegal immigrants and issue them work permits instead and why is this President still allowing 150,000 legal and I did say "legal" immigrants a month to come to this Country for jobs ?


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 10:28am
Bocephus,
 
My support for working men and women is the same as always. I AM NOT A DEMOCRAT NOR A REPUBLICAN!!! Get it straight. I think BOTH parties should be voted out. If you took the time to read what I've written in previous threads you would have figured that out by now. I've said it before and I'll say it again; WRONG IS WRONG!!! I don't care which party is "For" or "Against"; if it's wrong, it needs to be called what it is. It is wrong to disobey the laws of this country concerning immigration. If you're not supposed to be here, IMO, you have no protection under the Constitution because you are not subject to those laws. Any other consideration is secondary to the fact that you are in violation of US law simply by being here!!! You need to be deported, humanitarian reasons are a factor but are minor to the fact that you are violating the law. Besides that, why are you trying to sidetrack this issue? This is about stripping workers the very right to organize; what the hell does this have to do with immigration?!!!
 


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 12:05pm
TonyB....

"Your distaste for the public unions has been well documented on this blog. I appreciate your POV but your argument seems to always come around to "be like the private sector". From what I've read, you not only do not believe the arguments of the opponents of SB5, you don't care what those arguments are. It seem that your only concern is for those workers to "get screwed" just like everybody else. I just don't understand that".

TONY, I WAS RAISED IN A UNION HOUSEHOLD. GRANDPA WAS A 46 YEAR UNION MAN ON THE 4-HIGH TEMPER MILL IN WEST PROCESSING AT ARMCO. GREW UP HEARING STORIES FROM THE MILL THAT MANAGEMENT WAS NOT TO BE TRUSTED, WAS A NON-PRODUCTIVE DRAIN ON THE COMPANY AND HE TOLD ARMCO TO SHOVE THE FOREMAN'S JOB UP THEIR BEHIND WHEN IT WAS OFFERED TO HIM. HECK, I'VE EVEN GOT A TATOO ON MY LEFT UPPER ARM THAT HAS A GRIM REAPER WITH AN AXE AND THE SLOGAN "DEATH TO MANAGEMENT" YES, I WAS FIRMLY AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT, MANAGEMENT AND BELIEVED THE COMPANY WAS SCREWING EVERYONE BELOW MANAGEMENT. THE "LESSONS FROM GRANDPA" WERE DURING THE 60'S. THE TATOO WAS FROM THE 90'S. HOW'S THAT FOR THAT STAUNCH UNION STAND?

FAST FORWARD TO TODAY......I HAVE NEVER WORKED IN A UNION SHOP WHILE EMPLOYED BY EIGHT DIFFERENT COMPANIES OVER THE LAST 43+ YEARS. HAVE ALWAYS BEEN PRIVATE SECTOR, NEVER HAD A PUBLIC SECTOR JOB.

YOU ASKED ME TO EXPLAIN MY POSITION FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING....ALRIGHT...

I, ALONG WITH MILLIONS OF OTHER NON-UNION PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES, HAVE NEVER CAUGHT UP WITH THE UNION WORKERS, BE IT PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, AS IT PERTAINS TO BENEFITS, PAY, VACATION TIME, AND OTHER PERKS ON THE JOB. BECAUSE OF THAT, I AM FINALLY AT A POINT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, WHERE I SEE A NEED TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD. IF I'M GOING TO CONTRIBUTE TO PUBLIC SECTOR PERKS LIKE BENEFITS, PENSION, PAY RAISES AND PAYING FOR THEIR VACATION TIME (SOME WITH 13 WEEKS, UNHEARD OF IN NON-UNION PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT), I WANT TO SEE THE PUBLIC WORKERS CONTRIBUTE FROM THEIR PAYCHECK (THAT I HELPED PROVIDED), TOWARD THEIR OWN PENSION, BENNIES AND VACATION (EXCESSIVE) COSTS. IT IS AWFULLY HARD TO KNOW THAT WITH EACH PAYCHECK, TAXES TAKEN FROM MY PAYCHECK, ARE BEING USED TO GO TOWARD PUBLIC SECTOR JOBS, (BE IT TEACHERS, CITY WORKERS, FIRE, COPS) WHO WILL IN TURN, LIVE ON A HIGHER SCALE THAN I AM LIVING. IT IS PURE AND SIMPLE JEALOUSY THAT I AM FOOTING THE BILL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS WITH MORE PERKS. I AM PAYING 15-20% NOW FOR BENNY PREMIUMS FROM EACH PAYCHECK. I RECEIVE 10 DAYS OF VACATION UP TO 15 YEARS OF SERVICE. THEN IT GOES TO 15 DAYS WITH OVER 15 YEARS OF SERVICE. THE MAX. VACATION TIME IS 6 WEEKS, BUT WE'RE TALKING 35-40 YEARS OF SERVICE. AT LAST COUNT, I REMEMBER MY GRANDPA GETTING 13 WEEKS OF VACATION PER YEAR AND MOST OF THE TIME, HE SOLD THE TIME BACK TO THE COMPANY EACH YEAR.

A UNION PRODUCTION LINE JOB PAYS, WHAT, $30/HOUR OR MORE? A NON-UNION PRODUCTION JOB PAYS $10-$20/HOUR AT BEST FROM MY EXPERIENCE, EVEN AFTER ALL THESE YEARS. HELL, I STARTED IN PRODUCTION IN 1972 AT $2.75/HOUR AND WAS HAPPY TO GET THAT.

NEVER HAD SOMEONE GO TO THE "BARGAINING TABLE" FOR ME. IN A NON-UNION SHOP. EACH YEAR, YOU WENT IN TO THE BOSSES OFFICE, THEY WENT OVER YOUR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITH YOU, HANDED YOU A PIECE OF PAPER TELLING YOU HOW MUCH YOU WILL RECEIVE IN ADDITIONAL PAY, YOU SHOOK THEIR HAND AND LEFT. IT MAY HAVE BEEN 1% OR 3%, BUT YOU TOOK IT AS IT WASN'T "NEGOTIABLE". WILL NEVER BELIEVE THAT GIVING WORKERS A RAISE PRIOR TO WORK BEING DONE IS A GOOD IDEA. ONLY BREEDS COMPLACENCY AND A "I ALREADY KNOW MY RAISE FOR THE NEXT THREE YEARS, WHY SHOULD I TRY"..IT'S AUTOMATIC" MENTALITY. NO GOOD TONY, NO GOOD, IMO.

I BELIEVE IN THE MERIT SYSTEM ALSO. YOU CONTRIBUTE, YOU ARE REWARDED. IT FOSTERS ACCOUNTABILITY ON THE JOB. THE UNION PEOPLE HAVE LED ME TO BELIEVE THEY DON'T WANT THE MERIT SYSTEM, THEREFORE, IMO, THEY DON'T WANT A SYSTEM THAT REWARDS ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE. THEY DON'T WANT TO BE GRADED ON HOW THEY PERFORMED THEIR JOB. WHY? ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING? DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT THEY DO TO EARN THEIR MONEY? THE PROFICIENCY TESTS ARE AN INDICTMENT AS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TEACHERS AND THEIR UNION. THEY DON'T LIKE THE TESTS BECAUSE IT PAINTS A PICTURE OF HOW THEY ARE GETTING THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL MESSAGE TO THE STUDENTS AND IN MIDDLETOWN, IT AIN'T GOOD SO FAR.

IF SB5 PASSES, IT WILL LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD. IT WILL PLACE ALL PUBLIC WORKERS NOT ON A MERIT SYSTEM, ON ONE SO THE TAXPAYER HAS ACCOUNTABILITY AND CAN SEE WHAT THEY ARE GETTING FOR THEIR MONEY. SB5 WILL ALLOW THE PUBLIC SECTOR TO MOVE CLOSER TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN PREMIUM/RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORKER. IT WILL ALSO ATTEMPT TO CONTROL AN OUT OF CONTROL SITUATION WITH SOME UNION NEGOTIATIONS WITH CITIES AND STATES WHO CAN'T AFFORD THEIR DEMANDS. I WILL VOTE FOR SB5, NOT BECAUSE I HATE UNIONS. I JUST HATE THE FACT THAT THE UNIONS, OVER TIME, HAVE "DEMANDED THEMSELVES" RIGHT OUT OF AFFORDABILITY FOR THE TAXPAYER, CITIES, AND STATES. THEY HAVE GOTTEN TOO GREEDY FOR THE TIMES AND ARE TOO HIGH-PRICED TO ALLOW TO CONTINUE AT THEIR CURRENT PACE. IT IS A PARTIAL FAULT OF THE CITIES AND STATES FOR HAVING ALLOWED THE UNION REPS AT THE TABLE TO INTIMIDATE THEM AND CALL THE SHOTS. IT IS TIME FOR THE CITIES/STATES TO START SAYING NO AND PERHAPS ADOPTING NON-UNION SERVICES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TAXPAYER WHO IS BEING TRAMPLED TRYING TO FINANCE THIS. I DON'T BEGRUDGE ANYONE FOR FIGHTING FOR MORE MONEY OR BENNIES. I DO HAVE A PROBLEM IF THAT FIGHT STARTS BANKRUPTING THE PEOPLE THEY ARE SERVING. JMO



Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 1:48pm
Originally posted by VietVet VietVet wrote:

Today's Journal....

“Everything we do is geared around the classroom and educating children. That’s what it is all about,” Packert said. “We know the bargaining process is a give and take and we understand the financial situation that the board and district are facing.”

IF YOU UNDERSTAND PACKERT, WHY DON'T YOU WANT TO CONTRIBUTE MORE TO THE COST OF MAINTAINING YOUR PUBLIC POSITION? HAVEN'T HEARD AN OFFER TO PAY MORE INTO YOUR RETIREMENT OR BENEFITS COSTS, OR OFFER TO TAKE A VOLUNTARILY PAY FREEZE. TIME TO PAY THE PIPER, TAKE YOUR LICKS LIKE WE PRIVATE INDUSTRY PEOPLE HAVE HAD TO DO SINCE THE 80's.

VietVet,
 
As was reported in the Journal just a few months ago, negotiations between the MCSD and the MTA (for which Mr. Packert is on the negotiating team) went to a fact finder.  Both sides accepted the fact finder's recommendation for a 3 year contract: first year, 1% pay reduction and increase from 10% to 15% in employee share of health insurance premium; second year, another 1% pay reduction; third year, increase from 15% to 20% in employee share of health insurance premium; no step increases all 3 years.  Both unions agreed to this, and it was also applied to all non-union employees. 
 
Many school districts in Ohio have negotiated pay freezes but I think maybe only 1 other district negotiated a reduction.  The willingness of the unions to accept these concessions was critical for the financial health of MCSD. 
 
Marcia Andrew


Posted By: Bocephus
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 2:22pm
Originally posted by TonyB TonyB wrote:

Bocephus,
 
My support for working men and women is the same as always. I AM NOT A DEMOCRAT NOR A REPUBLICAN!!! Get it straight. I think BOTH parties should be voted out. If you took the time to read what I've written in previous threads you would have figured that out by now. I've said it before and I'll say it again; WRONG IS WRONG!!! I don't care which party is "For" or "Against"; if it's wrong, it needs to be called what it is. It is wrong to disobey the laws of this country concerning immigration. If you're not supposed to be here, IMO, you have no protection under the Constitution because you are not subject to those laws. Any other consideration is secondary to the fact that you are in violation of US law simply by being here!!! You need to be deported, humanitarian reasons are a factor but are minor to the fact that you are violating the law. Besides that, why are you trying to sidetrack this issue? This is about stripping workers the very right to organize; what the hell does this have to do with immigration?!!!
 
You seem so worried about the repblicans killing off the unions and the middle class just what the hell do you think flooding our jobs market with millions of legal and illegal immigrant workers is doing to the middle class? Or is it just that you are pro union and to hell with the rest of the middle class? How ever I can agree with your statement about both parties being voted out as they both are corrupt as all get up,maybe term limits should be imposed.


Posted By: ground swat
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 2:38pm
All fine news but the problem is much larger than 12% over three years. Performance reviews a must along with followup. " No child left behind" if it's crap then lets move on it and the teachers should be heard!  The inability to parent.  The SB5 topic for many of us is just one of many concerns when it comes to this cities and nations education system.  It always amazes me how easy it is to get the unions to "Come to the table"  when the general public Finally starts to question service for payment. 


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 2:51pm
Tony B says....

"I AM NOT A DEMOCRAT NOR A REPUBLICAN!!! Get it straight. I think BOTH parties should be voted out"

"I've said it before and I'll say it again; WRONG IS WRONG!!! I don't care which party is "For" or "Against"; if it's wrong, it needs to be called what it is"

Now, let's check what you said in your other post......

"Everything that is happening around the country is the Republican attack on working men and women at the expense of the wealthy"

" From the limits on unions to attacks on voter registration and voting rights to wanting to tax the poor, the wealthy have perpetrated a class war against the working class. They have the propaganda spin machine (FOX News) running all out to convince Americans to vote for their own servitude"

TonyB.....it sure "sounds" like you are on the Democratic (union) side when you look at the content of your comments above in mentioning Republicans and FOX News, which is Republican leaning news reporting. It doesn't "sound" like you are neutral in your political vision and it doesn't "appear" that you want to vote out both parties. JMO

I think it would be accurate to label you a CRUSADER for the working class/poor. Nothing wrong with that. Just disagree with your defense of the unions who seem to have gotten more than their fair share for decades. Again, JMO.

You know what the amazing part about all this debate is? I detest Boehner and the Republicans. Always have. Am a registered Democrat, never liked rich folks who throw it up to those who are not in their class, can't stand Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Rick Perry and those who would be like them. I also don't like the increasing greed coming from the Democratically sponsored unions and REALLY don't like the policies of Obama and cabinet member Solis on their stance on helping the illegals help themselves to our country. Disgusting. I won't even mention Pelosi nor Reid in this conversation. So many clowns on both sides of the aisle causing too many problems for this country.


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 2:55pm
Vet,
 
My friend, I think that we have the same target but different point of view.
 
Your employment story would be different, IMO; if there had been a union. Hard to know for sure, of course; it's easy to speculate about the imaginary. I would hope that you see the benefit of workers being able to negotiate as a group instead of individually. I've worked in union and non-union environments and even if the union is ineffective, you as a worker have certain basic rights. The whole concept of "work-for-hire" is essential to our modern society.
 
I also understand that it seems odd that government employment is a better life than private employment. I wonder why police, fire, other governemnt workers make far more money and enjoy better benefits. I imagine that it depends on the private sector job you have. If you work in the private sector and make more money than teachers, police, fire, etc. , then I guess you're doing ok. If not, you're like me and a number of others. I don't begrudge anyone their living and for the most part, I don't envy anyone's job and the responsibilities that go with it. IMO, Vet, you've been undercompensated for the work you've done both in the public and private sector. You've certainly done more just by having a job and paying taxes than what you've been compensated for. While working class wages stagnated, management "compensation" exploded. I don't think they shared the results of success with the workers who made it possible. Instead, wealth is now being systematically extracted from this country and neither political party is doing anything about it. In fact, both parties are living off off the fat while doing exactly what their political contributors want. The only playing field this levels is the one we'll all be begging on for food, shelter, and the possibility of tomorrow being better than this. Plus, the very thought that we are watching the disentigration of our country as though there is nothing we can do to change it. We can and must do something about it. We must vote down any attempt to restrict the rights of workers to organize. Then we must vote out those that would attempt to perpetrate such laws. This will not end it!!! If Kasich and every legislator in Columbus is not voted out at the first opportunity, they will see it as a vindication for their point of view. They will attempt again to deceive voters of their intent and only after they pass something are they willing to "negotiate"! I certainly think that labor and management in the public sector can accomplish a better outcome than this attempt to censor worker rights.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 2:56pm
Ms. Andrew....I stand corrected. Had forgotten or was not aware....can't remember which, that the concessions had occured. Thank you for the info. I appreciate the response.

The results from the negotiations listed in your post are certainly fair and warranted IMO, considering the situation.


Posted By: middletownscouter
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 3:08pm
Bocephus, which middle class jobs are being stolen away from Americans by illegal immigrants?


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 3:13pm
Why Vet, you type too damn fast!!! I can't answer the first one and you've already got another one up!!! I just can't type that fast.
 
The Democrats, IMO; are just as guilty of deceiving the American people and working rights including unions. MSNBC has some conservative elements but for the most part is as much a propaganda machine as FOX. I no longer read much into the comments of "pundits" or experts. Just because the Democrats suddenly found an issue that will resonate with voters doesn't mean that they support unions. Politicians will take money from anyone who wants to influence their vote and if you don't believe me, do a little cross-checking between contributors and legislative votes that influence the contributor. That's why they ALL MUST GO!!! It is the only way that we can have REAL CHANGE!!! Vote anyone out with a Democratic or Republican affiliation and perhaps reasonable INDEPENDENT legislators can go about correcting the abuses and excesses that these two parties are currently inflicting upon us. Never have I seen this country more divided and never have I seen more people trying to profit by it. I will gladly take up the role of "Crusader" if that word didn't have such a negative connotation!!!


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 3:15pm
I'll tell you one thing TonyB......I'll certainly be glad when this SB5 is voted on. I'm getting pretty sick and tired of hearing both sides of the story as to the political ads pro and con. Watch the news on all three Cincy channels each evening and I know I see the anti- issue 5 commercial 5 to 8 times an evening. Don't see the pro Issue 5 as much. Thank goodness for the channel selector button or mute button, right?


Posted By: Bocephus
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 3:33pm
Originally posted by middletownscouter middletownscouter wrote:

Bocephus, which middle class jobs are being stolen away from Americans by illegal immigrants?
 
Millions of illegal immigrants in this Country willing to work for lower wages lowers working men and womens ability to earn a liveable wage.Once they gain legal (status which is what this administration wants to grant them) then they can compete even more with American citizens for jobs not to mention the 150,000 or so a month of legal immigrants that come here every month for jobs I wonder where they all work at?when millions of Americans are unemployed? So lets see hmmm...Maybe by flooding our economy with cheaper foreign labor? Hope that answers your question.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 3:48pm
More from today's Journal......

Arguments for Issue 2
Reform unfair and costly government employment practices.

WILL MAKE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PAY MORE OF THEIR FAIR SHARE INSTEAD OF THE TAXPAYER. NOT "UNFAIR". JUST MAKES EXPECTATIONS EQUAL FOR EVERYONE-PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.

Control government spending, make government more accountable.

I DON'T KNOW IF ANY BILL WILL DO THIS. GOVERNMENT REFUSES TO BE ACCOUNTABLE AT ALL LEVELS. GOVERNMENT SPENDING HAS BEEN OUT OF CONTROL FOR SO LONG, IT MAY NEVER BE CORRECTED.

Schools can retain and reward good teachers by basing raises on job performance.

MERIT RAISES SHOULD HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN PLACE FROM DAY ONE.

Communities save millions of dollars annually, helping to balance budgets and retain jobs.

LESS SALARY AND BENEFITS COSTS FOR CITIES WITH TIGHT BUDGETS. MIDDLETOWN'S BUDGET HAS WHAT.....70% GOING TO PUBLIC SECTOR SALARIES, BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT COSTS? GOTTA REDUCE THAT, DON'T THEY?

Arguments against Issue 2
Public workers — such as fire fighters — will lose their rights and see their benefits gutted.

NOT TRUE...THEY WILL NOT TOTALLY LOSE THEIR RIGHT TO BARGAIN. IT WILL BE CHANGED, CORRECT? BENEFITS WON'T BE "GUTTED", THEY WILL HAVE THE SAME BENEFITS BUT WILL NOW HAVE TO CONTRIBUTE MORE FOR THEM LIKE THE PRIVATE SECTOR HAS BEEN DOING FOR YEARS. THAT'S FAIR IMO.

Public safety will be in danger because police will have a tougher time getting trained.

WHY? IF TRUE, CHANGE TO ACCOMODATE THE SITUATION. FIND ANOTHER WAY OF GETTING THE TRAINING DONE. COMPANIES DO IT ALL THE TIME. JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN DOING THINGS A CERTAIN WAY FOR YEARS DOESN'T MEAN IT CAN'T CHANGE AND ACCOMPLISH THE SAME THING, DOES IT? IT'S EASY TO SAY IT CAN'T BE DONE. HARD TO FIND ANOTHER WAY, BUT NOT IMPOSSIBLE.

Students will suffer because it will be easier to lay off teachers and cut school funding.

SCHOOL FUNDING COMES FROM PROPERTY TAXES, DOESN'T IT? NOT FROM THIS SOURCE. PERHAPS THE TEACHERS WOULD BE LAID OFF ANYWAY IF THEY COULDN'T CUT THE MUSTER UNDER THE MERIT SYSTEM. AGAIN, OVERCOME, ADAPT, CHANGE TO ACCOMODATE THE SITUATION. STOP EXPECTING THE WAY YOU HAVE BEEN DOING THINGS IS A RIGHT OF PASSAGE AND CAN'T BE CHANGED. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES IN THE WORKPLACE ANYMORE.

Politicians, executives will get an exemption while calling for “shared sacrifice.”

A PERFECT TIME FOR WATCHDOG GROUPS TO BE SET UP TO REPORT TO THE PUBLIC THE ACTIVITIES OF POLITICIANS AND EXECS. WE KNOW THEY ARE BULLsh*t--RS. VOTE THE POLITICIANS OUT. THE EXECS......IT'S UP TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO DETERMINE EXEC BEHAVIOR.


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 4:05pm
Typical, the only ones exempted either cost too much to prosecute or passed the laws for everyone else to follow. It certainly does make reducing the cost by firing the most expensive worker a likely outcome. What good is bargaining for less important things but not for the important things in life? The whole idea of things I'm not allowed to talk about disturbs me the most. Can't talk about a pay raise? What's next?


Posted By: middletownscouter
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 4:22pm
Originally posted by Bocephus Bocephus wrote:


Originally posted by middletownscouter middletownscouter wrote:

Bocephus, which middle class jobs are being stolen away from Americans by illegal immigrants?

 
Millions of illegal immigrants in this Country willing to work for lower wages lowers working men and womens ability to earn a liveable wage.Once they gain legal (status which is what this administration wants to grant them) then they can compete even more with American citizens for jobs not to mention the 150,000 or so a month of legal immigrants that come here every month for jobs I wonder where they all work at?when millions of Americans are unemployed? So lets see hmmm...Maybe by flooding our economy with cheaper foreign labor? Hope that answers your question.


No, it really doesn't answer the question at all. Lots of words but I must have missed the part where you actually answered my question. What current middle class job has been taken over by illegal immigrants?


Posted By: Bocephus
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 8:06pm
Originally posted by middletownscouter middletownscouter wrote:

Originally posted by Bocephus Bocephus wrote:


Originally posted by middletownscouter middletownscouter wrote:

Bocephus, which middle class jobs are being stolen away from Americans by illegal immigrants?

 
Millions of illegal immigrants in this Country willing to work for lower wages lowers working men and womens ability to earn a liveable wage.Once they gain legal (status which is what this administration wants to grant them) then they can compete even more with American citizens for jobs not to mention the 150,000 or so a month of legal immigrants that come here every month for jobs I wonder where they all work at?when millions of Americans are unemployed? So lets see hmmm...Maybe by flooding our economy with cheaper foreign labor? Hope that answers your question.


No, it really doesn't answer the question at all. Lots of words but I must have missed the part where you actually answered my question. What current middle class job has been taken over by illegal immigrants?
 
I think I answered your question you can view it how ever you like Wink


Posted By: Paul Nagy
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 8:33pm
TonyB,
       It seems that the discussion has gotten sidetracked from SB5 to Illegal Immigrants to middle class jobs and they are all entirely different issues with a little overlapping (imo). However, I think the discussion is worthwhile. To answer your question, "What current middle class job has been taken over by illegal immigrants?" I would name a few but they overlap with low income jobs in some areas also. How about those that are doing carpentry, asphalt driveways, siding and roofing. Those are middle class jobs aren't they?
        Thanks for the posts. I think this discussion is relevant in light of the present political issues.
             pn


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 8:49pm
Mr. Nagy,
 
I believe it was M29's question. You are correct that it is extremely relevant. Illegal immigration is a serious crime that deprive ordinary Americans of the rights of citizenship. When Americans don't have jobs it seems unconscionable to me to allow employment by those not legally here. The real point is that if we are going to be a country that enforces its laws and borders, allowing amnesty to lawbreakers is not the message that America should be sending.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 19 2011 at 9:34pm
Originally posted by Bocephus Bocephus wrote:


Originally posted by middletownscouter middletownscouter wrote:

Bocephus, which middle class jobs are being stolen away from Americans by illegal immigrants?

 
Millions of illegal immigrants in this Country willing to work for lower wages lowers working men and womens ability to earn a liveable wage.Once they gain legal (status which is what this administration wants to grant them) then they can compete even more with American citizens for jobs not to mention the 150,000 or so a month of legal immigrants that come here every month for jobs I wonder where they all work at?when millions of Americans are unemployed? So lets see hmmm...Maybe by flooding our economy with cheaper foreign labor? Hope that answers your question.


Truer words were never spoken Bo, particularly in Tucson Arizona. We moved there in 2004-2005. I searched for a decent paying job ($15-$20/hour) with benefits for 8 months before giving up and we came back to Ohio. What we found was that the illegals (and legals) were willing to work long hard hours for less pay than the American worker. The employer knew this and knew that they could hire legals (and illegals) at a lesser pay rate, didn't have to provide benefits, thereby not having to incur the cost of the premium coverage. This whole scenario drove down the wages and started a trend whereby employers stopped offering paid benefits. If you wanted medical coverage, they offered it, but you paid for it, if you could with the lousy hourly rate paid. If you opted to accept the wages offered to the legals/illegals, you couldn't afford the cost of living in Tucson. Only a small number of places to work that provided both.....U.of Arizona Medical Research Center, the hospitals, and Ratheon and you had a snowball's chance in hell getting into one of those places. The majority were low paying service jobs paying in the $6 to $10/hour range and no bennies. Bottom line....illegals do drive down wages, resulting in poor selection of decent jobs in an area and employers take advantage of the situation....for sure in Tucson.


Posted By: gemneye70
Date Posted: Sep 20 2011 at 2:06pm

Both parties claim they have the interests of the "common" man at heart, but they are both beholden to special interests, and say f**k everyone else any chance they get.  Neither side is willing to actually work together to fix our nation's problems, and there are many, or to make tough decisions because it will cost them votes.

I think there is enough blame to go around without oversimplyfying things and blaming everything on 1 or 2 institutions alone, i.e., unions, banks.  We have messed things up together, we need to make it right again together.  Country before party, not the other way around.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 21 2011 at 6:36am
Today's Journal....

SB5: Trust big issue between unions, governments
Cities, unions wary of each other as they await a decision by voters

David Lippert, president of Hamilton Caster, said whatever happens with the referendum on SB 5, the public will see increased costs, decreased services, or both.

“It’s a question of balance,” he said. “Everyone gets impacted. If an entity goes broke, that will impact the community negatively. If there’s a cutback in services or if costs go out of sight, that will be a negative impact.”

Lippert, whose company has unionized employees, said in the public sector, there is a check on costs because he can only sell his product for what the market will bear.

“There doesn’t seem to be much of a check on the costs of public employees,” he said.

Lippert said there needs to be better checks on the benefits that public employees receive in terms of wages, step increases, vacation and sick time as well as with the binding arbitration provisions.


TONYB- LIPPERT'S COMMENT BELOW IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SAY IN ALL OF MY POSTS.

“From everything I’ve read, public employees in general are pretty well compensated compared to their private sector counterparts,” he said


Posted By: TonyB
Date Posted: Sep 21 2011 at 8:29am
Vet,
 
I would have hoped that our elected officials and the people who negotiate with the public employees unions would provide those checks. Based on the competence with which the city has pursued the Cincy State deal, it's a wonder that they don't have even better benefits!!!


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Sep 28 2011 at 10:57pm
Holy cow!!!
Did I just read VietVet defending the REPUBLICANS about 15 or so post up above??? LOL LOL LOL
 
Politics certainly DO make strange bedfellows!!!


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 29 2011 at 6:27am
Originally posted by Mike_Presta Mike_Presta wrote:

Holy cow!!!
Did I just read VietVet defending the REPUBLICANS about 15 or so post up above??? LOL LOL LOL

 

Politics certainly DO make strange bedfellows!!!


Yep....I'm all for leveling the playing field between union and non-union shops and if this bill does that, then I'm all for it. Tired of paying into a fund through my payroll taxes that help finance public union workers who pay less into their bennies/retirement than I do and have as good of a benny package as I do. I gotta help my employer with costs by paying part of my premiums at work and some of their's too? Bullsh--! The old bring home pay in the old check looks a little more skimpy these days. Wonder what their's looks like in comparison? Ain't nobody looking out for the non-union worker. Never has been.



Print Page | Close Window