Print Page | Close Window

More Low Income

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: Economic Development
Forum Description: Local government efforts to develop the local Middletown area economy.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4291
Printed Date: Dec 25 2025 at 1:27pm


Topic: More Low Income
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Subject: More Low Income
Date Posted: Dec 21 2011 at 11:16pm

How many times over the past two years have we heard that we have an over abundance of housing stock?
Tonight I just happened to catch the last part of the last Planning Meeting. It seems that Adam Cristo wants to build 216 Units of Low Income Housing off
Towne Blvd. (Warren County, Lebanon School District). I thought this was TIF Commercial Property???
So this is the City’s NEW plan to get Section 8 Vouchers out of
Middletown and still be able to keep the funding.
Well Mr Kohler I can’t wait to hear what the
Lebanon School District will say about this deal at your next Planning Meeting.




Replies:
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Dec 22 2011 at 6:36am
Not bad enough that they trashed Middletown with their low income ghetto trash, now they want to start trashing Warren County too. Incredible. None of these people have any class, nor do they care how their decisions affect the people......including our neighbors. I hope the folks in Warren County tell them what they can do with their idea.


Posted By: NOLA
Date Posted: Dec 22 2011 at 9:29am
This project has been developing for sometime; originally this was to be a high end apartment/condo concept but I guess this proved more difficult to achieve.

Although there is a need for some subsidized housing, Almost every negative aspect of this community is clustered around these areas; public safety calls for service, problems in the schools, etc.


Posted By: ground swat
Date Posted: Dec 22 2011 at 9:44am
One word- Cristo!


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Dec 22 2011 at 11:47am

Nola
Yes this project has been in the planning stage since about 2007.
However how many times over the past few years have we heard the future of
Middletown’s growth is the Commercial Property located in the East End?
If in fact this is what the City really believes then why on earth would you want to use this valuable property for low income housing units?



Posted By: NOLA
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 7:27am
Vivian I am not advocating this or any other subsidize housing. It is killing this city and the schools. I live on the fringe of the largest blight area in town and have to deal with thefts and unsavory people daily.

The city must determine if it's the east end or the downtown area but unfortunately it can't be both at the same time.


Posted By: spiderjohn
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 7:34am
what about everything in between?
 
Things aren't going well in that area either


Posted By: NOLA
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 9:25am
Your right spiderjohn.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 10:06am

The numbers and actions of City Hall clearly show that they are now betting the bank on the Cincy State deal and the revitalization of THEIR downtown.
Do you think the votes of City Council would be different if each one had to invest $10,000 of their hard earned money into this deal?
All of those that live in the MIDDLE are on their own to fend for themselves.



Posted By: Jack Black
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 10:29am
Puzzled.............
Rumor has it that a key member of Mr. Adkins staff profited nicely as a high-risk, subprime home mortgage originator before coming to work for the city awhile back?  Help anyone?


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 1:47pm
Nola,

Where is every other city between Cinci and Dayton that has access to I-75 building?  The future of Middletown is not 5-7 miles off the interstate in a blighted downtown area where you can find more drug dealers and hookers than residents.

PacmanCool


Posted By: NOLA
Date Posted: Dec 23 2011 at 2:23pm
I agree; I noticed the new Casper and Casper sign on the Paychex building yesterday. I was simply stating that it one direction or the other; pick the most viable one and move with it. Downtown has nice ( architecturally speaking) buildings but will not be the revenue generator it was before the interstate was built.


Posted By: Richard Saunders
Date Posted: Jun 14 2012 at 4:28am

Butler County tops again in state in foreclosures

By Chelsey Levingston, Staff Writer
12:01 AM Thursday, June 14, 2012
 
Butler County had the highest foreclosure rate in the state in May, as lenders push through a backlog of distressed properties on their books.

One in every 291 houses last month received some kind of foreclosure proceeding, according to RealtyTrac Inc., an Irvine-Calif. firm that tracks foreclosure data nationwide. Butler County, which is the seventh largest populated county in Ohio, also had the highest foreclosure rate for 2011 in the state.

The amount of default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions made on Butler County properties have fluctuated all year, but hadn’t spiked as much in one month as what happened in May. A majority of last month’s total 510 foreclosure filings, about 250 of them, were orders directing a property to public auction, according to RealtyTrac’s data released today.

Real estate experts anticipated foreclosure filings would increase again before the cycle would end, related to the record $25 billion national mortgage settlement reached this year with the country’s largest lenders.

Yet, Middletown's movers, shakers, and cheerleaders keep telling us that "Middletown is booming," "real estate in Middletown has bottomed out," and that if we just raise taxes, everything will be just fine.

Does this make sense to you?



Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jun 14 2012 at 6:58am
Yet, Middletown's movers, shakers, and cheerleaders keep telling us that "Middletown is booming," "real estate in Middletown has bottomed out," and that if we just raise taxes, everything will be just fine

So the plan is to make Middletown a ghetto with and overabundance of low income, and/or providing the ones who want to work non-livable minimum wage jobs at fast food and service industry positions, paying $6 to $8/hour, living from paycheck to paycheck, barely paying the bills at best, and then adding more taxes? Not logical. Ya can't add more taxes on people who are in this situation. You're cutting your own throat revenue-wise by overtaxing the people as they will leave, reducing you tax base. And, relying on the rest of us to pick up the slack from those that are leaving town for greener pastures won't work either in the long run. Eventually, when the people who aren't beaten down as yet have had enough, they will leave town also. Better leave it alone.


Posted By: Bocephus
Date Posted: Jun 14 2012 at 7:49am
Woo Hoo more foreclosed houses for the care less landlords to buy and attract more section 8 renters with.
 
Please remember some of us like to keep our yards,streets and houses clear of our neighbors garbage,dogs and beer bottles so please if you own rental property it drives down every ones home values and quality of life to see bums drinking,doing drugs,fighting and just plain being obnoxious all day long. Thumbs%20Up
 
 


Posted By: swohio75
Date Posted: Jun 14 2012 at 10:32am

Looking at things from a more "global" perspective. 

U.S. foreclosures up for 1st time in 27 months

By Anna Louie Sussman

NEW YORK, June 14 (Reuters) - U.S. foreclosure starts rose year-over-year in May for the first time in more than two years as banks resumed dealing with distressed properties after a mortgage abuse settlement earlier this year, data firm RealtyTrac said on Thursday.

The $25 billion settlement between major banks and states, formally approved in April, had been expected to jump-start foreclosure proceedings that were previously stalled by uncertainty about the liability of banks.

Overall foreclosure activity, which includes default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions, affected 205,990 properties in May, a 9.1 percent increase from April.

The figure was 4.2 percent lower, however, than in May 2011, RealtyTrac said in a monthly report.

Foreclosure starts grew 12 percent from April and 16 percent on an annual basis after 27 straight months of year-over-year declines. Foreclosure starts were filed on 109,051 homes in May, the first month-to-month rise since March.

Bank repossessions increased 7 percent after sinking to a 49-month low in April, with 54,844 homes repossessed in May.

"That the May numbers were up the month after that settlement was completed is an indication that lenders are more confident that there are clear ground rules to foreclose now, so they can play by the rules," said Daren Blomquist, RealtyTrac's vice-president.

"The banks are getting to a place where they consider their foreclosure processing issues resolved, so they're confident enough to go ahead and push through more foreclosures," Blomquist said.

Blomquist noted the jump in foreclosure starts was not a sign that a new crop of borrowers was beginning to miss payments, citing figures from the Mortgage Bankers Association indicating new delinquencies fell in the first quarter of 2012.

Georgia's foreclosure activity increased by 32.9 percent from April and 30 percent from May 2011, making it the month's leader in foreclosure activity, ahead of Arizona, Nevada and California, the report said.

Nevada's foreclosure activity was down 66 percent from a year ago but it still has the third-highest rate of any state in the country.

The Riverside-San Bernardino metro area in southern California had 8,388 properties with foreclosure filings in May, a 19 percent increase from April. One out of every 179 housing units is in foreclosure, over 3.5 times the national average.

New Jersey continued April's trend, with 1,136 foreclosure starts in May, an annual rise of 118 percent. In April, foreclosure starts rose 180 percent annually.

Blomquist expected many of the new foreclosure starts to end in short sales, in which a property is sold and the lender keeps the proceeds in exchange for releasing the borrower from further obligation.

Short sales were up 25 percent in the first quarter of 2012, reaching a three-year high, since lenders can often fetch a higher price in a short sale than if they repossess them and then put them back on the market.

By moving houses out of the so-called "shadow inventory" and onto the market, the increase in foreclosures could be a drag on the fragile U.S. housing recovery. The S&P/Case-Shiller index of home prices in 20 metropolitan areas inched up February and March, in monthly terms.

The median nationwide asking home price in May rose 3.2 percent from last May to $194,900, and the number of homes for sale dropped 20 percent to 1.88 million, data from Realtor.com, the website of the National Association Realtors Association, showed.

(Reporting by Anna Louie Sussman; editing by M.D. Golan)



Posted By: LMAO
Date Posted: Jun 14 2012 at 12:43pm
[QUOTE=Bocephus] Woo Hoo more foreclosed houses for the slumlords to buy and attract more section 8 renters with.
 
You know you are a slumlord when you list your occupation as "Landlord"
 
[/QUOT
Sorry not all of us are SLUMLORDS. I take pride in my properties and my renters know that either obide by the lease or there gone.Angry



Print Page | Close Window