Print Page | Close Window

Pendleton Art Center

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: Community Revitalization
Forum Description: Middletown Community Revitalization News
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4620
Printed Date: May 14 2024 at 6:18pm


Topic: Pendleton Art Center
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Subject: Pendleton Art Center
Date Posted: Jun 16 2012 at 7:11pm

The man behind the stained glass

BeauVerre Riordan Studios teaches art at its workshops.

By Pamela Dillon, Contributing Writer 1:59 PM Saturday, June 16, 2012

    When your business is the oldest of its kind in the nation, you have a distinct reputation to uphold. Jay and Linda Moorman do a fine job of that. They own BeauVerre Riordan Stained Glass Studios at the corner of Central Avenue and Broad Street in Middletown.
    When you have a passion for what you do, success comes easy.
    “I was in my 20s, and
Cincinnati
was known for its stained glass. I tried to buy it because I thought it was beautiful, but could never afford it,” said Jay Moorman, 64. “So I asked a friend of mine to teach me how to do it. It quickly became an addiction.”
    He worked for General Electric by day and spent his off hours consumed with his new passion — stained glass. His mentor was Walter Bambach of Riordan Studios in
Cincinnati
. Twenty-nine years ago, Moorman was able to devote full time to his creative endeavors when he received a $500,000 commission to create windows for an Islamic Center.
     In 2002, Bambach sold Riordan to the Moormans, who operated BeauVerre Studio at the time. They only had 3,300 square feet of space in
Middletown; it was time to move. Luckily, the city of Middletown
was trying to unload a three-story building seven miles away that was becoming a prominent eyesore downtown. The Moormans snatched it up for $100.
    “The refurbishing had to be done within a year; we barely made it. We had to move 80,000 pounds of glass,” Moorman said.
    For their hard work, they now have an expansive, 24,000 square-foot space, comprised of three levels, plus a basement. The BeauVerre Riordan Stained Glass Studio includes many tenants: artists, photographers, a dance studio and a frame shop.
The culture-minded couple also purchased the Pendleton Art Center
across the street. Eighty artists hold exhibits there during the First Friday of the month.
   
“We try to do everything art related for the studio,” Moorman said.
    They are deviating from that formula somewhat; an
http://www.middletownjournal.com/entertainment/ohio-theater-arts/the-man-behind-the-stained-glass--1392233.html## -     “They can come in and get a steak and some crabmeat, a glass of wine and then take a tour of the studio,” Moorman said.
    The stained-glass workshops that were held on the first floor will now be moved to a spacious room in the basement. The next six-week class session will http://www.middletownjournal.com/entertainment/ohio-theater-arts/the-man-behind-the-stained-glass--1392233.html## -
    Contact contributing writer Pamela Dillon at pamdillon@woh.rr.com.

 




Replies:
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jun 16 2012 at 7:34pm
Now wait a minute!

"The culture-minded couple also purchased the Pendleton Art Center across the street".

IF THEY PURCHASED THE PENDLETON, WHAT WAS THE $265,000 OR SO OF CITY MONEY USED FOR DURING THE EARLY STAGES OF THE PAC? HOW DID THEY END UP OWNING THIS? THE CITY PURCHASED THE PAC WITH CITY TAXPAYER MONEY, DIDN'T THEY? WHEN WAS IT SOLD TO THE MOORMANS AND WHAT WAS THE SELLING PRICE?

FURTHERMORE, WHILE WE'RE ON THE SUBJECT OF MOORMAN DOWNTOWN OWNERSHIP, THE STORY MENTIONS THEY BOUGHT THE OLD G.C. MURPHY BUILDING FOR $100. DIDN'T THE CITY LOAN THEM $60,000 OR SO AT THAT TIME AND HAVE THEY PAID THAT BACK AS YET?

ALOT OF PAST ACTIVITY THAT SEEMS TO HAVE "FADED AWAY".


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jun 16 2012 at 11:43pm
Very interesting reading, Ms. Moon.  I wonder why this information wasn't reported by The Middletown Journal, which usually can't seem to publish enough articles about PAC or Beau Verre.
 
Here's some additional inteersting reading, from the Contract  between the City and Verdin approved by City Council in August of 2010:
 
From the Contract for Sale, Section 4 (f):
“The Loan shall be interest free, non-recourse and forgivable; each full year during which the completed Project is in operation shall reduce the principal amount of the Loan by ten percent (10%). The Loan may be fully forgiven. If the Developer ceases operation of the Project during the term of the Loan, ownership of the Property shall revert to the City and the Developer shall vacate the premises within thirty (30) days of request by the City to do so.”  [NOTE:  The "bold" emphasis was in the original document and was NOT added by me!!!]
 
Now I'm no attorney, but it certainly appears to me:  A) that "the Developer" (Pendletown Art Center LLC aka Mr. Verdin, who represented himself as the ONLY one in the world who had the expertise to make this fly) did NOT have the right to sell this, and in doing so is in default of his agreement with the City;  B)  ownership of the property has reverted to the City;  and C) perhaps the Moormans should be contacting a lawyer to recoup any losses they may have sustained due to Mr. Verdin's possible misrepresentation, as they will have no more recourse with the City than someone who "buys" the West Middletown bridge!!!


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jun 16 2012 at 11:49pm
Section 7A of The Contract:
 

SECTION 7A. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT AND COOPERATION

ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns. This Agreement is not transferable or assignable by Developer absent the City’s express written agreement and consent to such transfer and assignment. [Emphasis added]

I don't recall any approval of the transfer of this agreement from Verdin to the Moormans passing City Council.  Does anyone else???

 


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: Richard Saunders
Date Posted: Jun 17 2012 at 5:00am
Wow.  It looks like West Chester has their own little Bernie Madaff in Mr. Verdin.
First, he pulls a Professor Harold Hill job on the City of Middletown and gets them to believe in his "boy's band" at PAC just long enough to give his son-in-law $450,000 of taxpayer funds in no-bid construction contracts.
 
Then he sells a Brooklyn Bridge that he doesn't even own to the people across the street.
 
No wonder MMF wants in on the game.  They certainly must see the rubes in Middletown as easy pickings as long as the same people are running City Hall.
 
Maybe it's a good thing that Presta lost his bid for City Council.  We need someone like him more as City Manager.


Posted By: Middletown29
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 6:05am
MUSA = believe everything you read
Believe everything you read = Fools


Posted By: acclaro
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 6:21am
The fools are the city of Middletown using a couple who have a niche glass business, to drive their entire downtown investment strategy and paying 0% interest to employ 3 people. That's the reason CS & H left, not because of consolidation, but they washed their hands of the city giving sweet heardt deals to some, but not others. 

-------------
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill


Posted By: spiderjohn
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 7:06am
interesting piece, m29
don't know the author or the publication where it originated.
I have found no one who knows anything about this.
don't see the harm in posting it here, to be verified or de-bunked.
 
If true--shouldn't the proceeds revert back to the city?
The project has been a mixed bag so far.
No way that Mr.Verdin should profit from this at taxpayers' expense.
 
Actually, we might be better off if the Moormans acquired ownership.
This area is still extremely over the top is subsidized funding and forgiven/delinquent "loans"
 
Anyone check out the crime/police activity for Sunday evening?
Sunday-Fathers' Day--US Open--NBA finals--however an incredibly negative evening in the west end war zone districts. It is getting worse around here. We are not safe.


Posted By: acclaro
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 8:52am
Yesterday about 7 pm, there were two cruisers flying up and down Rosedale, through the major cul de sacs, and  then back up Rosedale, and the cul de sacs 2-3 times. Sirens blasting, two cruisers on each others tails as if controlled electronically. Assume a break in on Curryer or Thorn Hill. The decline of the city is mind blowing. The danger is real. There is no safe haven, and this string of activity yesterday was in front of the Police Chief's home, up and down Rosedale. Never seen anything like it,   

-------------
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill


Posted By: tomahawk35
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 11:29pm
Originally posted by Middletown29 Middletown29 wrote:

MUSA = believe everything you read
Believe everything you read = Fools
The only fools on here is the ones who listens to your crapOuch


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jun 19 2012 at 11:38pm
Originally posted by Middletown29 Middletown29 wrote:

MUSA = believe everything you read
Believe everything you read = Fools
Middletown29:
It was a story in The Dayton Daily News, a Cox publication!!!  Are you saying that they are grossly inaccurate??? Big%20smile


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: Middletown29
Date Posted: Jun 20 2012 at 5:36am
Presta
Are you saying the media would never publish anything that is grossly inaccurate?
If so, please read earlier post.


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jun 21 2012 at 6:18am
Originally posted by Middletown29 Middletown29 wrote:

Presta
Are you saying the media would never publish anything that is grossly inaccurate?
If so, please read earlier post.
Be sure to post the retraction/correction in the Dayton Daily News that you, Verdin, or the Moormans are sure to demand!!!  We will all be interested in reading it. Tongue

-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: PattiGal
Date Posted: Jun 26 2012 at 10:33am
The illustrious reporter changed the word "brought" to "purchased" misinterpreting the word as "bought". Kinda changes everything....huh?

-------------
"Because nice matters..."



Print Page | Close Window