Print Page | Close Window

Report Cards are in ..

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Schools
Forum Name: School Achievements
Forum Description: From Academic results to group and individual achievements
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5433
Printed Date: May 20 2022 at 7:49am


Topic: Report Cards are in ..
Posted By: ktf1179
Subject: Report Cards are in ..
Date Posted: Aug 22 2013 at 1:17pm
http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&cbSearchAgain=true" rel="nofollow">Search Again   http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&cbSearchAgain=true" rel="nofollow - Search Again    
http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=School&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - School http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=District&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - District http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=asc&CPIorderby=County" rel="nofollow - County Ascending http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_standards_met&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Standards met http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_performance_inde&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Performance index http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_Overall_ValueAdd&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Overall Value-Added  
Amanda Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFDA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=106&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=1" rel="nofollow - Details    
Central Academy Nongraded Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFCD http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=479&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=2" rel="nofollow - Details    
Creekview Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFDA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=603&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=3" rel="nofollow - Details    
Highview 6th Grade CenterMiddletown CityButlerFCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=1215&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=4" rel="nofollow - Details    
Mayfield Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=1752&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=5" rel="nofollow - Details    
Middletown High SchoolMiddletown CityButlerDCNR http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=1820&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=6" rel="nofollow - Details    
Middletown Middle SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=3013&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=7" rel="nofollow - Details    
Miller Ridge Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=2298&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=8" rel="nofollow - Details    
Rosa Parks Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerDCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=722&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=9" rel="nofollow - Details    
Wildwood Elementary SchoolMiddletown CityButlerFCA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=72262631328417&RecordID=2808&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=10" rel="nofollow - Details    
Records 1-10 of 10



Replies:
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 22 2013 at 2:27pm
Based on this chart, it appears that all the so-called "negative" claims made by me and other school critics have been substantiated. Yes, indeed, with data provided, we have information which may be indefensible. Clicking on the details, I like the explanations given for this new grading criteria for each category. A maze created by mega-wizards for the purpose of confusion. How does one sit and think up this nonsense anyway? Guess they have to make up a conglomeration of crap to mask the real performance of a given district. What ever happened to just one grading system, understood by everyone and very user friendly? Wasn't hard to see at a glance......A's and B's are good......C is average (but can't you do a little better), D's are not acceptable but yet not failing at the moment and F's are bad news. Kinda simple. Why all the other rating scales to confuse the issues? Appears to be too many college educated eggheads trying to put their scent on something......and failing miserably.

What say you chmoore1? There's the data.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: ktf1179
Date Posted: Aug 22 2013 at 2:56pm
Sad even Franklin did way better than Middletown.
http://news.cincinnati.com/comments/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card" rel="nofollow -
http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&cbSearchAgain=true" rel="nofollow">Search Again   http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&cbSearchAgain=true" rel="nofollow - Search Again    
http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=School&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - School http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=District&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - District http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=asc&CPIorderby=County" rel="nofollow - County Ascending http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_standards_met&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Standards met http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_performance_inde&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Performance index http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=desc&CPIorderby=Letter_grade_of_Overall_ValueAdd&cbCurrentPageSize=" rel="nofollow - Overall Value-Added  
Anthony Wayne Elementary SchoolFranklin CityWarrenDCC http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=160&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=1" rel="nofollow - Details    
Franklin High SchoolFranklin CityWarrenABNR http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=1088&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=2" rel="nofollow - Details    
Franklin Junior High SchoolFranklin CityWarrenDCF http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=2983&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=3" rel="nofollow - Details    
George H Gerke Elementary SchoolFranklin CityWarrenDBC http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=1214&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=4" rel="nofollow - Details    
Hampton Bennett Early Childhood CenterFranklin CityWarrenNRNRNR http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=2896&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=5" rel="nofollow - Details    
Hunter Elementary SchoolFranklin CityWarrenABC http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=1416&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=6" rel="nofollow - Details    
Pennyroyal Elementary SchoolFranklin CityWarrenBCC http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=2136&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=7" rel="nofollow - Details    
William C Schenck Elementary SchoolFranklin CityWarrenDBA http://news.cincinnati.com/interactive/article/20130822/NEWS0102/130822017/View-your-school-s-report-card?appSession=103862690822219&RecordID=2811&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=8" rel="nofollow - Details    
Records 1-8 of 8



Posted By: spiderjohn
Date Posted: Aug 22 2013 at 3:19pm
Disappointing
Obviously we have a lot of work to do, and I think that we have a good team to bring on improvement.
And they could use a lot of outside help from parents and role models. Let's hope that it happens!


Posted By: ktf1179
Date Posted: Aug 22 2013 at 4:16pm
Here is a link that lists all the Dayton area counties and scores
http://www.whiotv.com/news/news/education/state-releases-report-cards-area-schools/nZZGj/" rel="nofollow - http://www.whiotv.com/news/news/education/state-releases-report-cards-area-schools/nZZGj/


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 8:48am
While the letter grades are a new thing, the underlying measures that these grades are based on (at least the ones put out this year) are the same measures that have been on state-generated district report card for years.  So, you can compare and see that Middletown has improved from last year. 
No one is happy with the achievement levels, but we have improvement plans in place that are reviewed each year, and we have been seeing steady improvement for at least 3-4 years. That is why Middletown earned an A in value added growth.  We have been above value added for the last three years in a row.  That means that students in Middletown City schools are learning more than a year's worth each year.  To me, this is the most important grade on the report card, because it shows how well a district is doing in actually improving a student's academic success, rather than just reflect the socio-economic background of the students who walk through its doors. (A news release yesterday from OSBA and OASBO stated that there was a high correlation between test scores for Ohio school districts and the income/poverty levels of the student body).
 
Middletown's Performance Index rose again, about a point from last year.  It remains a C (Continuous Improvement last year), but it is moving in the right direction.  The Performance Index measures all scores on all tested subjects, and gives weight to which of the 5 levels (Basic, Limited, Proficient, Accelerated, Advanced) a student scores, not just whether or not they passed.  So, it looks at the achievement of all students, not just the ones hovering above or below just passing.
 
The first letter grade for standards met is Vet's favorite, the old number of indicators reached out of 24.  Middletown reached 8 this year, up from 6 last year. Again, no one is saying we are content with 8 but that is still improvement. On almost every indicator, the percentage of students passing rose, but if you don't hit the magic (arbitrary) 75% district-wide, you don't earn the indicator.  The higher percentage passing does show up indirectly in the Performance Index and the Value Added Growth factors.
 
The 4 year and 5 year graduation rates also rose from last year -- I don't have the numbers in front of me, but by several percentage points. This is something the district is really working hard to increase, identifying kids at risk of dropping out (or not passing the OGTs) early and getting them extra help. 


Posted By: bumper
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 9:01am
Among Middletown’s letter grades were three “F’s,” three “C’s” and an “A.The Middletown and New Miami districts received an “F” for meeting less than half of the possible 24 indicators,.”wow that's really bad & sad Confused if I would have brought home any F's or D's on my report card, Dad would take away my $2.00 a week allowance and my weekend fun at the skating rink, or any other kind of fun untill the next report card a least showed  C's extra 5 bucks for a B and 10 bucks for an A and oooboy I did my best to keep everything at a C LOL.. that 2 bucks meant alot!! mom would always give me a little moreBig smile.. ok now back to the F's,throwing $$$ for New schools won't change a thing, IMO... now like many back in the day it was sometimes cold in class and the many days of taking test and sweating like a thief in church and I still at least made C"s even took summer school once for more credit and sweating like krazy.. so now gotta ask who's doing all the sleeping in class kids or teachers??


Posted By: ktf1179
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 9:40am
If you get the Performance index of the schools up to a B. Then I will support the new school. Because once people see a clear improvement in the school, then hopefully people that will begin to move back to Middletown, because school performance is a Major factor when deciding where to move. I hope the Students, Teachers and Parents will rise to this challenge and prove the State and the region that Middletown can be a good school system once again.


Posted By: ohiostorm
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 11:15am
While bringing up the grade from a 40% to a 50% is an improvement it is still flunking.  Failure is Failure. And the Central Academy scores are particularly disturbing. Maybe it is time to save the school system some money and close Central.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 11:23am

I’m also disappointed with the scores of our elementary schools.
However I’m also disappointed as I stand in line at the library and see bags and bags of children’s movies being checked out and not one book for these young children to read.
How do we get these parents to UNPLUG the TV and TURN OFF the cell phones and curl up on the sofa with their child and read a book with them?



Posted By: Stanky
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 11:35am
Originally posted by ohiostorm ohiostorm wrote:

While bringing up the grade from a 40% to a 50% is an improvement it is still flunking.  Failure is Failure. And the Central Academy scores are particularly disturbing. Maybe it is time to save the school system some money and close Central.


ohiostorm, leave poor Central alone. That special school has it's own approach and follows a model of letting kids learn at their own pace and in their own way. Don't rush them or expect too much! ;-0


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 12:48pm
Ms. Andrew:

"The first letter grade for standards met is Vet's favorite, the old number of indicators reached out of 24. Middletown reached 8 this year, up from 6 last year. Again, no one is saying we are content with 8 but that is still improvement."

8 OUT OF 24 IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT IF YOU WERE AT 10 OF 24 AT ONE TIME. IT IS TWO INDICATORS SHORT OF THE HIGHEST TO DATE. IN ACTUALITY, THE DISTRICT HAD REGRESSED 4 INDICATORS FROM THE PREVIOUS HIGH AND THEN IMPROVED BY 2. IT WAS A RELAPSE. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, GOING FROM 6 TO 8 AND CALLING IT AN IMPROVEMENT, WHEN THE NUMBER TO BEAT IS 10, IS MISLEADING INFORMATION. THIS DISTRICT HAS NEVER APPROACHED THE HALF WAY MARK IN INDICATORS MET. IT HAS TAKEN THIS LONG TO REACH TWO SHY OF THE HALFWAY MARK. HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO REACH ALL 24? OTHER POOR DISTRICTS HAVE FARED BETTER. IT WAS DECADES, BEFORE THE RAMPANT LOW INCOME/SECTION 8 ONSLAUGHT HAPPENED. THE DISTRICT DIDN'T FARE ANY BETTER BEFORE THE TOWN WAS INFECTED WITH ADDITIONAL LOW INCOME. AFTER DECADES OF NON-IMPROVEMENT COMPLACENCY, ISN'T IT TIME TO FIND A METHOD THAT WILL PRODUCE UPWARD IMPROVEMENT RATHER THAN TO KEEP USING THE SAME OLD REASONS FOR NOT PRODUCING RESULTS? CAN WE GET PAST THE "WE'RE A POOR COMMUNITY", "WE MUST DEAL WITH AN INFUSION OF LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS THAT DON'T VALUE EDUCATION" AND "WE'RE DEALING WITH A TOTALLY DIFFERENT DEMOGRAPHIC THAN MOST DISTRICTS ARE" COMMENTS AND ADJUST THE METHODS TO MEET THE CHALLENGES OF EDUCATING THE QUALITY OF KID WE ARE GIVEN TO MEET THESE GOALS? ADAPT TO WHAT YOU ARE GIVEN TO WORK WITH. MANY DO. HAMILTON IS DOING BETTER AND THEY ARE SIMILAR IN DEMOGRAPHICS, RIGHT? HOW ABOUT FRANKLIN'S DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT. SIMILAR DEMOGRAPHICS ALSO. WHAT ARE THEY DOING THAT MIDDLETOWN IS NOT?

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Aug 23 2013 at 1:14pm
I'm told that Steve Price supported the "planning experts" at city hall via the substantial increase of S8 Housing Choice Vouchers.  This mistake of all mistakes was intended to increase school enrollment as well as public education funding.  Any help on this?


Posted By: Historic House Guy
Date Posted: Aug 24 2013 at 6:35pm
How about letting the kids take their books home to do their homework??? Think THAT might help just a little bit?


Posted By: itsamee
Date Posted: Aug 26 2013 at 12:39pm
That would be great, if they had enough text books for all students to go around....

-------------
Itsa me, mario!


Posted By: LMAO
Date Posted: Aug 26 2013 at 12:58pm
Originally posted by itsamee itsamee wrote:

That would be great, if they had enough text books for all students to go around....

Guess since we dont have to pay fee's now we can't Bitch about kids bringing books home to do home work.I myself griped a lot last year about not letting my granddaughter bring a book home to do her home work.


Posted By: itsamee
Date Posted: Aug 27 2013 at 1:04pm
Originally posted by LMAO LMAO wrote:

Originally posted by itsamee itsamee wrote:

That would be great, if they had enough text books for all students to go around....

Guess since we dont have to pay fee's now we can't Bitch about kids bringing books home to do home work.I myself griped a lot last year about not letting my granddaughter bring a book home to do her home work.

I used to work at MCSD.  Truth-be-told, the lack of text books is a point of rage for many of the teachers as well. Many teachers spend (or, at least used to spend) their planning periods making copies of text materials so students would have something to help them learn with.  

On a side note, I have thought about posting up an "ask me anything" on these forums regarding the schools as seen through the eyes of a former employe.  Was not sure if there would be interest on these boards or not.  


-------------
Itsa me, mario!


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Aug 27 2013 at 6:25pm
Itsamee,

It Depends, what was your position?

PacmanCool


Posted By: wannaknow
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 6:32am
So what's the solution? Send your children to a low performing school and just hope they can get enough education to make it in life? I am in a quandary. My child goes to Central Academy. I was told it was the most progressive grade school in Middletown.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 6:46am
Originally posted by wannaknow wannaknow wrote:

So what's the solution? Send your children to a low performing school and just hope they can get enough education to make it in life? I am in a quandary. My child goes to Central Academy. I was told it was the most progressive grade school in Middletown.


JUDGING BY THE SCORES LISTED ABOVE, CENTRAL, BEING A NON-GRADED SCHOOL, DOESN'T FARE ANY BETTER THAN THE REST. IF YOU CAN AFFORD THE TUITION, SEND THE CHILDREN TO FENWICK. ANY NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL WILL BE BETTER. MONROE, EDGEWOOD, EVEN FRANKLIN SCHOOLS ARE A BETTER CHOICE AS TO PERFORMANCE. MIDDLETOWN SCHOOLS HAVE NOT FOUND THE ANSWER TO SUCCESS IN DECADES. MAY NEVER BE AS SUCCESSFUL AS THEY ONCE WERE 4 DECADES AGO. NEW THEME TO THE CITY BROUGHT ON BY CITY LEADERS CALLED POVERTY......AND WITH THAT COMES THE EXCESS BAGGAGE OF THE LOWERING OF STANDARDS AND RESULTS. WHEN YOU CREATE A LOW INCOME, POVERTY STRICKEN ENVIRONMENT, SOMETIMES YOU YIELD WHAT THAT ENVIRONMENT OFFERS.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: bumper
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 8:19am
wth is going on with these kids ?? A 13-year-old Middletown Middle School student was charged with criminal mischief after he allegedly smeared feces on the wall of the girls bathroom in the auditorium.. this child should be somewhere besides school.. ...could this be the results of people on drugs having kids being this messed up ?? IMO( im no doc)  but this child has a  mental health disorder!! I would hope if the parents don't do it that the court would put him in a mental health facility and hope for the best....Confused


Posted By: ktf1179
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 9:14am
It could be a result of multiple things, lack of discipline and respect of parents.The obsession with being the next big YouTube viral video by doing something stupid. The overall lack of respect for authority by the new generations. And I don't care attitude by parents. And because of all of this, the Schools are not only needing to teach kids in the classroom, they are also now having to be parental figures to these kids because the parents don't want to do it.
They would rather spread there legs and have a good time, rather than think about how their poor decisions not only could impact the child they bring into this world by not raising them, but also the impact on the community for having to pick up for their lack of responsibility.


Posted By: itsamee
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 10:26am
Originally posted by Pacman Pacman wrote:

Itsamee,

It Depends, what was your position?

PacmanCool

Due to wanting to stay as anonymous as possible on the Internet (right, NSA?) I am a little hesitant to throw out what I used to do there. I can say, I had daily interaction with teachers and faculty. I was actually contracted by an outside source and spent several years in the district.  


-------------
Itsa me, mario!


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 12:05pm
WELL, HERE IT COMES......THE OLD "THE NUMBERS DON'T TELL THE WHOLE STORY" EXPLANATION. I BELIEVE WE HAVE HEARD THIS BEFORE.



School districts: Report card data doesn’t tell full story

Educators in Middletown and Hamilton say they are disappointed with the letter grades their schools received on the new state report card, but added the scores don’t tell the whole story about academic growth in the two districts.

The report cards, released last week by the Ohio Department of Education, provide data pieces on the performance of all students on state-mandated tests, how much growth students made in the course of a year, and a school building’s ability to ensure success for all students regardless of income, race or disability.

In Middletown City Schools, eight of nine school buildings recorded an “A” for overall value-added.

At Amanda Elementary in Middletown, principal Candace Dillon said for the first time in the school’s history, students met the state indicator for fourth grade reading. The school has only met one other indicator in the past — fourth-grade writing in 2004.

“Our school has had a history of academic struggles, but we’re making increases every year,” Dillon said, who’s entering her fifth year as principal.

BUT DILLON, IF YOU WERE "MAKING INCREASES EVERY YEAR", THAT WOULD REFLECT IN THE YEARLY REPORTS WOULDN'T IT? IT STATES IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE THAT THE SCHOOL HAS ONLY MET ONE OTHER INDICATOR IN THE PAST-FOURTH GRADE WRITING IN 2004. HOW CAN YOU BE MAKING INCREASE EVERY YEAR IF 2004 WAS THE ONLY YEAR TO SEE AN INDICATOR MET? MAKE ANY SENSE TO ANYBODY? CONFUSED TALK.

Dillon said even though Amanda didn’t meet the state standards for test scores, the school did exceed one year’s expected growth for all students in math and reading. Dillon said her students made an average of two to three years growth during the 2012-13 school year.

“We made such nice gains but we were so low to begin with,” Dillon said. “The new report card doesn’t show the gains.”

TRANSLATION.....WE WERE SO LOW TO BEGIN WITH, WE WEREN'T EVEN ON THE RADAR TO MEET AN EVALUATION. WHEN WE DID SHOW IMPROVEMENT, IT STILL WASN'T ENOUGH TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NOR REGISTER ON THE RADAR SCREEN TO SHOW POSITIVE GAINS.

Amanda Elementary’s performance index score has increased from 66 points in 2009 to 80 points in 2012. Dillon said the steady improvement over the past five years tells her the interventions in place to improve student learning are working

BUT EVEN AFTER 5 YEARS AND SHOWING IMPROVEMENT DURING THAT TIME, AMANDA RECORDED POOR NUMBERS AND WAS STILL TOO LOW TO SHOW A MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT.

Two miles down the road, Rosa Parks Elementary was the only Middletown elementary school not to receive an “F” for meeting the state standard in test scores. The school received a “D” grade for a majority of students testing proficient in third and fourth grade reading and math. Fifth graders at Rosa Parks didn’t test proficient in math, reading or science

"ONLY ELEMENTARY TO NOT RECEIVE AN F". KINDA TELLS IT ALL DOESN'T IT? ROSA PARKS WAS THE BEST WITH A D GRADE. WHEN YOU ARE IN A GROUP WHERE ALL ARE ON THE BOTTOM. IT ISN'T HARD TO SHINE WITH A BELOW AVERAGE GRADE. SAD EPITAPH FOR THE MIDD. SCHOOLS. WHEN WILL WE START TO RAISE THE BAR AND LESSEN THE MEDIOCRITY? EVERYONE ELSE HAS. WE HAVE BEEN SATISFIED WITH BELOW AVERAGE FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW.

NOW WAIT A MINUTE......

“The student data doesn’t lie,” said principal Ted Jebens. “The data shows you where you’re strong and weak.”

NOW TED, YOUR STATEMENT KINDA GOES AGAINST THE OLD "REPORT DOESN'T TELL THE WHOLE STORY" TITLE ABOVE. DON'T MAKE THE "EXCUSE FOLKS" LOOK BAD.

Jebens said for the 2013-14 state report card next year, Rosa Parks will have an added subgroup of English as a Second Language. Schools must have at least 30 students in a subgroup for it to become a recognized subgroup at a particular building

ENGLISH AS A "SECOND LANGUAGE" HUH? RIDICULOUS. IN THIS COUNTRY, ENGLISH WAS DECLARED THE PRIMARY LANGUAGE AND HAS BEEN FOR A LONG TIME. GONNA LIVE HERE, SPEAK ENGLISH. GONNA LIVE IN MEXICO, ACCEPT SPANISH AS THE PRIMARY. SORRY, TOO OLD SCHOOL TO ACCEPT ANYTHING ELSE.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 4:01pm
Vet, why did you leave out the part of the article where the Journal reported that 8 of 9 Middletown school buildings earned an "A" for Value Added, meaning students learned more than a year's worth in a year? 
You are always comparing Middletown schools to Hamilton schools.  What grade did Hamilton schools earn for Value Added (hint: the answer was in the article that you selectively quoted from).


Posted By: acclaro
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 4:17pm
All I can think of to describe the system/ district as Ms. Andrew sees it, as I am a golfer, is "grinding" the round out. 

-------------
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 28 2013 at 6:52pm
Originally posted by Marcia Andrew Marcia Andrew wrote:



Vet, why did you leave out the part of the article where the Journal reported that 8 of 9 Middletown school buildings earned an "A" for Value Added, meaning students learned more than a year's worth in a year? 
You are always comparing Middletown schools to Hamilton schools.  What grade did Hamilton schools earn for Value Added (hint: the answer was in the article that you selectively quoted from).


Ms. Andrew, with all due respect, I believe the statements.....

"Rosa Parks Elementary was the only Middletown elementary school not to receive an “F” for meeting the state standard in test scores".

And.....

"The school has only met one other indicator in the past — fourth-grade writing in 2004."

trumps your "Value Added" card.

Ms. Andrew, the students "learning more than a year's worth in a year" means nothing if they can't retain the information to pass the tests. THE TESTS DETERMINE HOW EFFECTIVELY THEY RETAINED THE KNOWLEDGE THEY LEARNED. IF THEY CAN'T RETAIN THE KNOWLEDGE TO DEMONSTRATE A PASSING GRADE ON RECALL, WHAT GOOD DID "LEARNING MORE THAN A YEAR'S WORTH IN A YEAR" DO? IT SERVES NO PURPOSE IF IT CAN'T BE RECALLED.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 11:05am
Vet, your answer to my question surprises me.  I had assumed that you deleted from the article the statement that 8 of 9 Middletown city schools received an A for overall Value Added because you are too stubborn to give credit for any success because it doesn't fit your narrative.  We all agree that F is a bad grade, but you can't bring yourself to agree that an A is a good grade.
 
But, your answer leads me to think that the reason you left out the good results is that you do not understand what the Value Added score is measuring. You said, "THE TESTS DETERMINE HOW EFFECTIVELY THEY RETAINED THE KNOWLEDGE THEY LEARNED. IF THEY CAN"T RETAIN THE KNOWLEDGE TO DEMONSTRATE A PASSING GRADE ON RECALL< WHAT DOOD DID "LEARNING MORE THAN A YEAR"S WORTH IN A YEAR" DO?"  The Value Added Score is derived from the same tests as the score for the number of Indicators Met and the score for the Performance Index.  The difference is, Indicators Met and Performance Index only look at a snapshot of how the students scored on one day in April 2013.  The Value Added score compares how the students did one day in April 2013 to how the same students did one day in April 2012.  Put another way, in response to your comment, Indicators Met and Performance Index measure how effectively the students retained the knowledge learned to demonstrate recall on the tests, whereas Value Added asks, did the student retain (and recall for the test) more knowledge this year than last year?
 
To think about how schools can earn an A on Value Added while getting an F for Indicators Met and a C for Performance Index, let me try to give a few hypothetical examples. 
 
Example 1: In 2012, Student 1 had the correct answer to 20% of the questions on the 3rd grade reading test.  That student was not "proficient" in reading so the district does not have 75% or more of all students proficient on the 3rd grade reading test, and does not meet that Indicator.  A 20% score is the lowest level, Limited, earning the fewest points toward the Performance Index score for the district.  In 2013, Student 1's reading ability improved quite a bit, and he answered 55% of the questions right on the 4th Grade Reading test.  This raised Student 1 to the next of 5 levels, Basic, but is still not Proficient, so does not add to the percentage of students district-wide who scored Proficient or higher on the 4th Grade Reading.  So, despite the improvement of imaginary Student 1 (multiplied by other students), the number of tests where the district has 75% or more students pass does not change, so the number of Indicators Met does not change.  In this hypothetical, the district's Performance Index would go up a little, because a Basic score earns more points than a Limited score, although both are still fewer points than Proficient, Accelerated or Advanced.
 
Example 2: In 2012, Students 2 through 11 answer 60% of the questions right on 3rd grade reading, and do not pass -- they score Basic, not Proficient.  The district does not earn the Indicator Met for 3rd grade reading because only 70% of the students are Proficient or higher.  In 2013, Students 2 through 11 answer 70% of the questions right on 4th grade reading, so their scores improve to Proficient.  These 10 students are 10% of the 4th graders so (assuming for the example that every other 4th grader scored on 4th grade reading at the same level they scored on 3rd grade reading the prior year) the percentage of students district wide increases to 72% on 4th grade reading.  However, the magic cut off of 75% is not reached, so the district does not earn that indicator, and its score on Indicators Met stays at F.  The District's Performance Index would go up a little bit because these Proficient scores earn more points than Basic scores.
 
So, while I have over-simplified the examples, this is what has been happening in the Middletown schools.. For at least the last 3 years, Middletown has earned Above Value Added growth.  Some students are increasing their individual scores on the state tests, but still below proficient, while others are achieving proficient for the first time but the district-wide results for that grade level have not crossed the 75% threshold to earn the Indicator Met.  (Or, in some grade level/subjects, the percentage is hovering right around 75%, and small changes in the number of students proficient each year cause the number to move just below or just above 75% versus the prior year, with the resulting swing from 5 Indicators Met (2010) to 10 Indicators Met (2011) to 6 Indicators Met (2012) to 8 Indicators Met (2013).  I would also like to point out that the percentage of students scoring Accelerated or Advanced has steadily increased each of the last 5 years as well.  This does not impact the number of Indicators Met but it does increase the Performance Index score, because Accelerated and Advanced scores earn more points.  So, over the last 5 years, Middletown's Performance Index score has improved from 81.7 to 88.5, which reflects these various types of growth.
 
By the way, the answer to my question about Hamilton City Schools, which you ignored, is that 7 of 10 school buildings received an F for Value Added, meaning their students on average learned less than a year's worth in a year.  This backwards progress is reflected in the district's Performance Index score, which went down from 93.7 in 2012 to 91.5 in 2013.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 11:22am
To respond to several posters who made reference to Franklin's results (at least one person erroneously called Franklin's results "improvement") and asking how, given what they say are similar demographics, why can't Middletown do what Franklin is doing?
 
First, Franklin did not improve.  Franklin's Performance Index went down from 98.5 in 2012 to 97.9 in 2013.  Franklin scored a C on overall Value Added as a District..I agree that Franklin's B for Performance Index is better than Middletown's C, and that Franklin's B for Indicators Met is better than Middletown's F.
 
Second, Franklin's demographics are not similar to Middletown's.  Middletown had 71% economically disadvantaged students, compared to 50% in Franklin; Middletown had 35% non-white students, compared to 5% in Franklin; Middletown had 5% students for whom English is their second language, compared to fewer than 10 students in the entire Franklin distirct. These are not excuses, they are just the facts that the schools have to deal with.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 11:48am
Acclaro, I am not a golfer, so I cannot respond directly to your comment about "grinding it out."  However, to borrow your metaphor, if your average golf score for a round of 18 holes changed from 100 to 90, wouldn't you say your golf game had improved, even while admitting you weren't ready to go pro?
 
As a golfer, do you think it would be fair to judge your ability level as a golfer by your score on one particular day, regardless of how you were feeling that day?  Don't golfers keep a lifetime handicap based on the average of their scores over dozens, if not hundreds of rounds? 
 
Do you think it would be fair to judge how your ability to play golf has improved or declined year to year by looking only at your score on that one particular day each spring, but making you play a different course each year while giving you only some vague information about which course you would play on the day that counted for your annual score?
 
Let's say you take lessons from a pro.  Do you think it would be fair to judge his ability as a pro by whether and how much your handicap improves?  Do you think it would be fair to judge his ability as a pro by whether and how much the handicap of all of his clients improves, even if he can't choose who to take on as his client, and his client base includes golfers with physical and mental disabilities and others who have no hand/eye coordination and only show up at the golf course under threat of punishment?
 
My questions may sound ridiculous, but this is how public education is judged in the U.S.
 


Posted By: Neil Barille
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 11:53am
Thank you for your explanations Ms. Andrew.  You are an asset to the board.  As for the results, it think it should be pretty obvious to most people that the primary problem with the performance numbers of the MCSD has more to do with the student body and their situations than it does the staff, the administrators, the teaching methods, etc.  Only so much can be done.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 1:11pm
MS. ANDREW:

"Vet, your answer to my question surprises me. I had assumed that you deleted from the article the statement that 8 of 9 Middletown city schools received an A for overall Value Added because you are too stubborn to give credit for any success because it doesn't fit your narrative. We all agree that F is a bad grade, but you can't bring yourself to agree that an A is a good grade"

YOU ARE 100% CORRECT MS. ANDREW. I AM VERY STUBBORN. ALWAYS HAVE BEEN. YOU CAN ADD ARGUMENTATIVE TO THAT TOO. THERE YOU ARE. I'M HUMAN AND HAVE FLAWS. MOST DO. NOW, IF WE CAN JUST GET PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY TO ADMIT THE SAME THING, WE COULD ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING.

YES, THE "A" IS A GOOD GRADE. USUALLY IS. BUT THE COLUMN THE A'S ARE IN, IE. VALUE ADDED, ONLY TELLS US WHAT THE KID LEARNED, OR DIDN'T LEARN DURING A DESIGNATED TIME FRAME. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AS TO CONTRIBUTION TOWARD THE TESTING ASPECT OF EDUCATION? APPARENTLY NOTHING. LOOK AT THE RESULTS IN THE OTHER TWO COLUMNS. MUST BE LITTLE RETENTION OF WHAT WAS LEARNED IN "VALUE-ADDED" AT TEST TIME. IE....THE SUCCESS YOU HAD IN VALUE ADDED DID NOT MAKE THE TRANSITION, NOR HELP THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE.

MS. ANDREW:

"Put another way, in response to your comment, Indicators Met and Performance Index measure how effectively the students retained the knowledge learned to demonstrate recall on the tests, whereas Value Added asks, did the student retain (and recall for the test) more knowledge this year than last year?"

OK, "INDICATORS MET" AND "PERFORMANCE INDEX" HAVE VERY POOR RESULTS FOR THIS DISTRICT BY THE DATA WE SEE. "VALUE ADDED" HAS RESPECTABLE SCORES ACCORDING TO THE DATA. SO, THE STUDENTS WERE POOR AT RETAINING THE KNOWLEDGE LEARNED TO DEMOSTRATE RECALL AND DID BETTER THIS YEAR THAN LAST ON RECALLING TEST INFO? WHAT? CONFUSING TO SAY THE LEAST. THROW OUT THE VALUE ADDED AND JUST GIVE US THE TEST DATA RESULTS FROM YEAR TO YEAR. VALUE ADDED IS THERE AS A RESULT OF OVERANALYZING THE DATA. INDICATORS MET AND PERFORMANCE NUMBERS IS REALLY ALL WE NEED, ISN'T IT? AREN'T WE GRASPING AT STRAWS HERE LOOKING FOR ANY RAY OF SUNSHINE WE CAN FIND WITH THIS CURRENT METHOD OF EVALUATION?


WE BOTH HAVE NARRATIVES TO THE INFORMATION AT HAND. WE ARE BOTH LOOKING AT THE SAME DATA, BUT HAVE ARRIVED AT ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS. YOU ARE HOLDING THE "VALUE-ADDED" COLUMN ON THE CHART AS THE SOLE DETERMINING FACTOR ON SUCCESS AND I AM LOOKING AT ALL THOSE PESKY LITTLE C, D's AND F'S IN THE OTHER TWO COLUMNS. THAT BEING SAID, WHICH COLUMN IS THE MOST IMPORTANT?........THAT IS LEFT TO THE PURVEYOR OF THE DATA.

AND FINALLY....

"By the way, the answer to my question about Hamilton City Schools, which you ignored, is that 7 of 10 school buildings received an F for Value Added, meaning their students on average learned less than a year's worth in a year"

"THEIR STUDENTS ON AVERAGE LEARNED LESS THAN A YEAR'S WORTH IN A YEAR"

.....THAT SAYS IT ALL MS. ANDREW. NONSENSICAL PROGRAM USING SILLY TERMS AND CRITERIA. WHY THIS KIND OF REASONING TO EVALUATE KIDS? WHOEVER CREATED THIS JUMBLED MESS NEEDS TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL THEMSELVES FOR A LARGE DOSE OF SOME COMMON SENSE. AND JUST HOW WOULD ONE MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT IF THEY KNEW THE KIDS WERE LEARNING "LESS THAN A YEAR'S WORTH IN A YEAR"? HOW WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO SELF-EVALUATE TO HAVE TIME TO CORRECT?

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 4:35pm
Vet, I think you are still not understanding that the Value Added score comes from the same standardized tests as the Indicators Met and Performance Indicator.  There is only one set of tests; the OHio dept of education analyzes the data from those tests in many different ways to come up with these different scores/grades.  The growth that is recognized as Value Added is reflected in the "testing aspect of education."
 
It is not my view that Value Added is the only measure that matters.  Each of the grades tells us something. I will readily admit to being stubborn and argumentative as well.  However, I try to keep an open mind and not jump to conclusions until I have all the information.
 
I did not come up with this state grading system and don't defend it.  However, as to why it is helpful to look at progress of the same student from one year to the next, let me throw out another analogy.  Say you were going to buy stock.  Company A and B both have earnings per share of $40.  But Company A's earnings per share have risen steadily from $25 to $40 over the last 3 years, while Company B's earnings per share have dropped over the same time period from $55 to $40.  Trend data tells you a different story about those two companies that you won't see if you only look at a snapshot of how they did in the most recent year.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 29 2013 at 8:51pm
Fair enough Ms. Andrew. To avoid a subject that has been beaten to pieces here, and to assume that we will agree to disagree on what is important, I will not offer any comments toward your reply.

I will finish by saying that I find the educational criteria for grading students nowadays to be a conglomeration of confused diatribe that can offer anything the interpreter of the data wants it to be. Selections of what is important are muddled at best and the designers didn't even attempt to make it user friendly. It was put together by a group of people (be it political or academic) who don't have a clue how to simplify systems and apparently feel that useless data in certain areas matters. This grading criteria just flat out overworks the data into fine little bits of numbers or letters.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: ohiostorm
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 11:36am

I guess the frustration is, Hooray we improved a bit last year in a one year snapshot. However we are still failing in most aspects of providing an education for the children of the district. In the interest of beating a dead horse......what about the performance of Central Academy.While I realize that this school has a different approach, it obviously is not meeting the standards of education that have been set. How do we justify the money spent to have this additional school? Can we maybe absorb the students into their neighborhood elementary and spend the money saved on more education options to bring up the education level in the district as a whole?



Posted By: Bill
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 12:50pm
ohiostorm, so you want to eliminate one educational option, Central Academy, in order to have more money for educational options.  Huh?  
I agree with others that say a large part of the reason for our standardized test results is our kids not the teachers, the teaching methods, or the options.  I suppose SOME of those things play a role.  And improvements should always be sought but to pretend that the test data is some sort of indictment of the district's staff is not realistic.


Posted By: ohiostorm
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 1:16pm
I am saying that the Central Academy approach needs to be evaluated for it's effectiveness. I would like some answers as to why we would continue an experimental approach to education like Central when it continues to score lower then the standard approaches that are being made that Ms. Andrews has highlighted as a huge success.


Posted By: Marcia Andrew
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 5:15pm
OhioStorm wrote, "we are still failing in most aspects of providing an education for the children of the district."  I cannot agree with that interpretation of the state report card results.  I agree that for those children who did not score proficient or higher, many of them are capable of proficiency and I would agree that we have failed those children to some degree.  However, some of the students who scored below proficient are children who have severe learning impairments/mental retardation, and it is not realistic to expect that they will ever pass a grade level test, even though they are continuing to learn each year. I don't think we have failed those students.  And we certainly haven't failed the vast majority of students, who score proficient or higher on the state tests.  Just as an example, 69.5% of third graders passed the math test and 73.6% of third graders passed the reading test.  That is not "failing in most aspects."
 
OhioStorm also wrote, "What about the performance of Central Academy. . . it obviously is not meeting the standards of education that have been set."  Central Academy's grade of F for Value Added is definitely a concern and it is being addressed. It is not consistent with past results; Central has generally in the past been one of the highest scoring elementaries in Middletown.  This year's results varied greatly depending on the grade level.  Central's 3rd grade and 7th grade both out-performed the district average by large margins in both reading and math. (83.3% of Central 3rd graders scored proficient or higher on reading, compared to 73.6% district-wide; 91.7% of Central 3rd graders scored proficient or higher on math, compared to 69.5% district-wide; 90.3% of Central 7th graders scored proficient or higher on reading, compared to 67.2% district-wide; 74.2% of Central 7th graders scored proficient or higher on math, compared to 63.8% district-wide.) (All 4 of those results also exceeded state-wide averages, btw). In 4th grade, however, the opposite happened (72.9% of Central 4th graders scored proficient or higher in reading, compared to 82.3% district-wide; just 54.2% of Central 4th graders scored proficient or higher on math, compared to 70.6% district-wide). Central's results for grades 5, 6 and 8 compared to the rest of the district were more mixed.  So, there were definitely some issues last year that the district has made moves to fix, but where some of these results exceed 90% passing, the data does not support your conclusion that the school "is not meeting the standards of education."
 
I encourage any one who is interested in more detailed breakdowns of scores by school or by grade level to go the Ohio department of education web site; there are links on the home page to search for state report card results that include lots of charts and graphs.
 
As to the suggestion that money could be saved by closing Central, I don't think that we could close the building. The elementary buildings are full as we already reduced the number from 8 to 7 a couple of years ago, when we closed Verity and re-purposed Highview as the 6th Grade Center.


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Sep 01 2013 at 10:47pm
John Stossel - Stupid in America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icHcYNGXvjU" rel="nofollow -



Print Page | Close Window