Print Page | Close Window

Ann Coulter Talks about her NBC Ban for Life

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Outside World
Forum Name: News, Info and Happenings outside Middletown
Forum Description: It might be happening outside Middletown, but it affects us here at home.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=847
Printed Date: May 19 2024 at 7:41am


Topic: Ann Coulter Talks about her NBC Ban for Life
Posted By: Middletown News
Subject: Ann Coulter Talks about her NBC Ban for Life
Date Posted: Jan 08 2009 at 9:14am
You can not get into Human Event, where Ann Coulters article is published without getting this message. (So I published it here for you)


This Is the Downer We've Been Waiting For!
by  Ann Coulter
01/07/2009
 

After NBC canceled me "for life" on Monday -- until seven or eight hours later when the ban was splashed across the top of The Drudge Report, forcing a red-faced NBC to withdraw the ban -- an NBC insider told The Drudge Report: "We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," explaining that "it's such a downer. It's just not the time, and it's not what our audience wants, either."
   
In point of fact, I'm not particularly critical of Obama in my new book. I'm critical of the media for behaving like a protection racket for Obama rather than the constitutionally protected guardians of our liberty that they claim to be. So I think what the NBC insider meant to say is that NBC is not interested in anyone so highly critical of NBC right now. It's such a downer, it's just not the time, and it's not what their audience wants right now, either.
   
In fact, I think my book is the downer America has been waiting for! So herewith, I present an excerpt from the smash new book out this week, Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault on America:
Continued 
   
When the Obama family materialized, the media was seized by a mass psychosis that hadn't been witnessed since Beatlemania. OK! magazine raved that the Obamas "are such an all-American family that they almost make the Brady Bunch look dysfunctional." Yes, who can forget the madcap episode when the Bradys' wacky preacher tells them the government created AIDS to kill blacks!
   
Still gushing, OK! magazine's crack journalists reported: "Mom goes to bake sales, dad balances the checkbook, and the girls love Harry Potter" -- and then the whole family goes to a racist huckster who shouts, "God damn America!"
   
Months before network anchors were interrogating vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin on the intricacies of foreign policy, here is how NBC's Brian Williams mercilessly grilled presidential candidate Barack Obama: "What was it like for you last night, the part we couldn't see, the flight to St. Paul with your wife, knowing what was awaiting?"
   
Twisting the knife he had just plunged into Obama, Williams followed up with what has come to be known as a "gotcha" question: "And you had to be thinking of your mother and your father." Sarah Palin was memorizing the last six kings of Swaziland for her media interviews, but Obama only needed to say something nice about his parents to be considered presidential material.
   
The media's fawning over Obama knew no bounds, and yet, in the midst of the most incredible media conspiracy to turn this jug-eared clodhopper into some combination of Winston Churchill and a young Elvis, you were being a bore if you mentioned the liberal media. Oh surely we've exploded that old chestnut. ... Look! Look, Obama just lit up another Marlboro! Geez, does smoking make you look cool, or what! Yeah, Obama!.
   
The claim that there's no such thing as a left wing press is a patent lie said to enrage conservatives. Newspapers read like the press under Kim Jong Il, which, outside of a police state, looks foolish. The prose is straight out of The Daily Worker, full of triumphal rhetoric with implicit exclamation points. Still, their chanted slogans fill your brain, like one of those bad songs you can't stop humming.
   
There is no other explanation for the embarrassing paeans to Obama's "eloquence." His speeches were a run-on string of embarrassing, sophomoric Hallmark card bromides. It seemed only a matter of time before Obama would slip and tell a crowd what a special Dad it had always been to him.
   
The major theme of Obama's campaign was the audacity of his running for president. He titled his keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, "The Audacity of Hope" -- named after a sermon given by his spiritual mentor Jeremiah Wright, whom we were not allowed to mention without being accused of playing dirty tricks. (Rejected speech titles from sermons by Rev. Wright included "God Damn America!," "The U.S. of K.K.A." and "The Racist United States of America.")
   
What is so audacious about announcing that you're running for president? Every U.S. Senator has run for president or is currently thinking about running for president. Dennis Kucinich ran for president. Lyndon LaRouche used to run for president constantly.
   
But the media were giddy over their latest crush. Even when Obama broke a pledge and rejected public financing for his campaign -- an issue more dear to The New YorkTimes than even gay marriage -- the Times led the article on Obama's broken pledge with his excuse. "Citing the specter of attacks from independent groups on the right," the Times article began, "Sen. Barack Obama announced Thursday that he would opt out of the public financing system for the general election."
   
So he had to break his pledge because he was a victim of the Republican Attack Machine.
   
When Obama broke his word and voted for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act bill (FISA), the Times' editorial began: We are shocked and dismayed by Sen. Obama's vote on ... oh, who are we kidding? We can't stay mad at this guy! Isn't he just adorable? Couldn't you just eat him up with a spoon? Is he looking at me? Ohmigod, I think he's looking at me!!!! Couldn't you just die?
   
It has ever been thus.



-------------
Please like our http://www.facebook.com/middletownusa" rel="nofollow - Middletown USA Facebook Page




Replies:
Posted By: Middletown News
Date Posted: Jan 08 2009 at 9:15am
Ann Sums it up nicely:

When Obama broke his word and voted for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act bill (FISA), the Times' editorial began: We are shocked and dismayed by Sen. Obama's vote on ... oh, who are we kidding? We can't stay mad at this guy!


-------------
Please like our http://www.facebook.com/middletownusa" rel="nofollow - Middletown USA Facebook Page



Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jan 10 2009 at 8:56am
The only time you hear from Coulter is when she's hocking one of her books. This "lady" is a classic collection of toxic protoplasm of little worth and has made many enemies. I can see why.


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Jan 10 2009 at 9:26am

Yes Vet just like the Dailykos.com, Huffingtonpost.com, Bill Maher, The Bomb Throwers at MSNBC, Michael Moore, Al "I want to be a Senator" Franken, Moveon.org, George Soros, Janeane Garagalo, Rosie O'Donnell, 95% of the idiot actors in Hollywood........and on and on and on. 

Funny I don't see the Right Press banning any of them from their shows.  As a matter of fact most of them wont even appear on Fox News.
 
And yes Coulter is hawking a book and her little show does quite well for her and the news shows eat it up and can't wait to put her on and NBC's little stunt will probably increase her sales, pretty smart on her part.
 
 


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jan 10 2009 at 1:25pm
Pacman- thanks for the info. from the "Right". Those " Bomb Throwers" from MSNBC are just trying to counteract the "ordinance" coming from Fox. Works both ways ,you know! What are you suggesting- that one side has no right to defend itself? If you're not a member of the " Righteous Right", you're wrong? If so, there's a place where you can dispose of that logic.


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Jan 10 2009 at 2:00pm

Nope Vet usually the left is not defending itself it is ripping a conservative a new........ The left has far more extremists on National TV than the right.  Yet it is the left that is constantly complaining that it is being picked on.  The fact is the Conservatives are outnumbered yet they have a few spokespersons that shall we say are more effective.  Why else is the left trying to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.

If both sides would try to reach a middle ground rather than waste time bickering we would all be far better off.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jan 10 2009 at 8:29pm
Pacman- both sides will never reach a middle ground because they both think like you and I. I will never agree with you on certain subjects.You will never agree with me. Same with Washington. Conservatives are outnumbered??? Incredible statement to make! Here in Butler County, IN YOUR OWN BACKYARD, is a prime example where the Conservative base outnumbers the Dems by a significant number. That's one reason why Dems can't get elected around here. "Effective" spokespersons?- When you're the only game in town, and the opposition doesn't offer any competition, I guess you could call it a victory. Good for you! Extremists? - How about people like Limbaugh, Coulter, Cunningham, O'Reilly, Hannity, and Laura Ingraham? Not extreme enough for you? And the left has what you see on CNN, HBO and MSNBC- (Bill Maher, Rachel Maddox and Keith Oberman)-the Left doesn't have much on radio either compared to the WLW's of the world. That one station with Mike McConnell and Bill Cunningham outnumber anything around here as to any Left/Moderate programming. There's no question where WLW stands on it's politics. That's there perogative but it would be more interesting if they had some Left offering programs.



Print Page | Close Window