Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, April 27, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Legislation Item 5
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Legislation Item 5

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Legislation Item 5
    Posted: May 15 2010 at 11:28am
Mike- Spider......NAYSAYERS. Trust your city leaders to make the correct choices downtown. Oh sure, there has been a great deal of money spent and nothing accomplished but they have "big things in the works" for that area. Please be patient! And....sure, there may be some "extra time" taken ON OCCASION by our hardworking city employees, but that's just the "culture" within the city building, you see, and these things are not to be scrutinized in detail. City management is probably planning on taking care of this problem as we speak.
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 7:41am
Very true, Mike.
At least the city building employees will hace somewhere close for their all-day snacking.
When you are down there during lunch time, do you ever notice that they take their hour +, then bring their lunches back to eat at their desks?
 
Definitely time to use time cards and time clocks in the building.
No harm in a little record-keeping and timeliness!
 
Imagine all of those extra runs to UDF!
 
But---what happens when the city building moves out to the east end?
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 5:38am

Now Spider, I fear that you are not giving credit where credit is due. Can’t you see that “things are booming” in the new, improved Olde Downe-Towne Middletowne???

We will soon have a new, trendy wine bodega (The new UDF)!

We will soon have a new, hip bistro with an “alfresco” dining option (The new UDF)!

We will soon have a new Malte Shoppe & Confectionery (The new UDF)!

We will soon have a new, custom tobacconist and Cigar Shoppe (The new UDF)!

We will soon have a new, “green” energy transfer depot with TEN (count ’em, TEN) petrol bowsers (The new UDF)!

With all of this will come many new high-tech, high-paying, white-collar positions of employment, an up-surge in payroll tax revenue, a high-end housing boom, and all of the other fruits that our “Rule-by-personal-preference” form of municipal governance brings.

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 9:08pm
amen
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 8:06pm
OK Mr.Gordon, I have said little to support my thinking, while you have done fairly well laying out your activities and justifying them.
 
Now--let's get to the cold honesly of these efforts and the situation:
 
The MCF and the Chamber continually trumpet the value,efforts and future of the area formerly known as "downtown", while we both know that the MCF and the Chamber would both like to leave that area for greener pastures. The MCF has a sweet deal to stay in the Manchester for now, while the Chamber can't get anyone to take their building.
 
Despite constructions,de-constructions, road changes, new facades, new businsesses(most quickly gone after a short but painful financial experience) and a LOT of granted monies, our area formerly known as "downtown" looks worse than ever, and is more disfunctional than ever. We have spent tens of millions of $$$ to look as badly as we look now, with the meaningful activity level being more depressed than the appearance.
 
The current effort to remove Family Services, the Hope House and the govt.assistance agencies might be somewhat misguided, because that area has become the closest and most convenient area for these services to be provided. Plus, these facilities are the ONLY locations attracting any activity, also currently located. It MIGHT WELL be the higher end locations that are out of place, and that area might be best utilized by these social services made necessary by our city-created glut of Section 8 housing, companioned with a serious lack of meaningful employment(AND a work force incapable of fulfilling meaningful employment).
 
we simply can't continue to blindly throw money at these deep issues, hoping that SOMETHING will miraculously work. 
 
Still--the MCF and you hardly caused any of this, and MCF is a top shelf community volunteer organization serving the needy.
 
jmo
Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 4:59pm
  • The%20Wall%20Street%20Journal
  • Detroit Shrinks Itself, Historic Homes and All

    DETROIT—Wrecking crews are preparing to tear down a landmark 5,000-square-foot house in the posh neighborhood of Palmer Woods in the coming weeks, a sign that Detroit is finally getting serious about razing thousands of vacant and abandoned structures across the city.

    In leveling 1860 Balmoral Drive, the boyhood home of one-time presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Detroit is losing a small piece of its history. But the project is part of a demolition effort that is just now gaining momentum and could help define the city's future.

    Detroit is finally chipping away at a glut of abandoned homes that has been piling up for decades, and intends to take advantage of warm weather and new federal funding to demolish some 3,000 buildings by the end of September.

    Mitt Romney's boyhood home is among 3,000 derelict structures Detroit plans to demolish by the end of September as it attacks blight and crime.
    Mayor Dave Bing has pledged to knock down 10,000 structures in his first term as part of a nascent plan to "right-size" Detroit, or reconfigure the city to reflect its shrinking population.

    When it's all over, said Karla Henderson, director of the Detroit Building Department, "There's going to be a lot of empty space."

    Mr. Bing hasn't yet fully articulated his ultimate vision for what comes after demolition, but he has said entire areas will have to be rebuilt from the ground up. For now, his plan calls for the tracts to be converted to other uses, such as parks or farms.

    Even when the demolitions are complete, Detroit will still have a huge problem on its hands. The city has roughly 90,000 abandoned or vacant homes and residential lots, according to Data Driven Detroit, a nonprofit that tracks demographic data for the city.

    After a stuttering start, caused by a dispute over the disposal of asbestos from demolished homes, the program is just now gaining pace.

    City officials say they aren't sure how many structures ultimately need to be torn down. The mortgage crisis compounded Detroit's economic decline, leaving nearly 30% of the city's housing stock vacant, according to Data Driven Detroit.

    "Neighborhoods that are considered stable are now at 20% vacancy," said Deborah Younger, a development consultant involved in the demolition effort.

    Until recently, the city didn't have the funds to tackle its growing list of houses slated for demolition. But $20 million in federal funds, primarily stimulus dollars has helped to kick-start the effort.

    Demolition, particularly of historic buildings, is a sensitive issue in Detroit, often leading to wrenching battles between developers, residents, city officials and preservationists. But many residents are now pleading with the city to tear down decaying structures that are attracting crime and repelling home buyers. However, some still worry that the sort of large-scale bulldozing that the city is now talking about will forcibly dislocate longtime homeowners and preclude any chance of a comeback for Detroit.

    "The city has never done this before," says Ms. Henderson, the Building Department chief. "We had to make a culture change."

    The demolition of the Romney family home is the first of its kind in Palmer Woods, a high-end enclave in northwest Detroit that was developed at the dawn of the U.S. auto industry and housed many of its pioneers. Palmer Woods has just a handful of vacant properties among its 292 homes, according to residents. It's one of the anchor neighborhoods that is critical to the success of Mayor Bing's right-sizing effort.

     
    Back to Top
    wasteful View Drop Down
    MUSA Citizen
    MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: Jul 27 2009
    Status: Offline
    Points: 793
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wasteful Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 4:01pm
    Knock'em Down.
    Back to Top
    Bill View Drop Down
    MUSA Citizen
    MUSA Citizen


    Joined: Nov 04 2009
    Status: Offline
    Points: 710
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 1:18pm
    It wouldn't surprise me if all Thatcher's buildings. including the Manchester Inn, are handed to the city for $1.
     
    More demolition!
    Back to Top
    Vivian Moon View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council


    Joined: May 16 2008
    Location: Middletown, Ohi
    Status: Offline
    Points: 4187
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 10:49am
    VietVet

    Swallen's Building - Walter Leap said he had four quilified buyers over the years for the Swallen's Building and the City turned down all the deals...now we the citizens get to foot the bill for the million dollar demo bond.

    I have also been told that the bank building has now been offered to the Middletown Historical Society. Was this building ever put up for sell by Mr. Thatcher?

    Bike Path - Vet I believe if the City buys all his frontage to the property his property will then be landlocked and therefore he will not be able to build on it. The value of his property will go down and the only people that he can sell the rest of his property to are his neighbors on each side. He stated before council that he didn't want to sell his property beacause he wanted to build on it later....Keep your eye on this deal. 

    Back to Top
    VietVet View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council
    Avatar

    Joined: May 15 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7008
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 7:44am
    Vivian- the Swallens Building- didn't Perry Thatcher say he had an interested party that wanted to pursue the Swallens Building? Then, after his statement, it faded into the sunset as to interest, right?

    Bike Path property- can the city tell a property owner that he can't build on his property if it is properly zoned? The city can't use the old "emminent domain" crap and seize his property for the bike path, can they? Does the city just make up property rules on the fly as the need arises? What's the deal with this?

    South Park- Common sense, perhaps?.......evaluate the need before spending the money. How many people use South Park? Do the people who use South Park use the amenities that are there now? If the numbers merit the cost, then spend the money. If not, there are plenty of potholes to patch. Divert the money to the streets. This money might patch a hole or two. Lord knows, they are good at "diverting" money, right Mr. Carolus?

    Renaming Sunset?- Don't we have a park out by the water tower off Manchester that needs a name? How about that becoming Armbruster Park? It's in an area of town where he lived and didn't he have a hand in getting that developed? Don't remember. JMO
    Back to Top
    Dead man walkin' View Drop Down
    MUSA Resident
    MUSA Resident
    Avatar

    Joined: May 06 2010
    Status: Offline
    Points: 51
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dead man walkin' Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 7:15am

    Spirit says that Middletonians will be getting hoodwinked once again Tuesday night.

    "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil" (Psalm 23)
    Back to Top
    spiderjohn View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: Jul 01 2007
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 2749
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 7:05am
    Thank you again for the clarifications, Mr.Gordon.
     
    The MCF makes a large # of grant choices.
    As with anything else, some don't function as hoped.
    Your spin above was very good.
    We all must use lemons to make lemonade.
     
    You reference many of Ms.Wright's projects as baggage left on your doorstep.
    I thought her leadership to be very good.
     
    Some might view the Paducah trip as non-producing(after the fact, of course), and similar results with the south end project still in development as you mention.
     
    Still--you do your best to make the right call, and hope for the best as to results.
    Your record is pretty good so far.
     
    jmo
    Back to Top
    DuaneGordon View Drop Down
    MUSA Immigrant
    MUSA Immigrant


    Joined: May 12 2010
    Status: Offline
    Points: 32
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DuaneGordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2010 at 11:55pm
    Glad to share the information, Spiderjohn and Bill. We try to be as open as possible with our work in the community and if anyone wants to know anything about us, I enourage them to call and ask -- or just drop by and chat with me.
     
    No, I didn't include the Paducah trip in these numbers, but that was not a "city" project. That was an idea from the end of Kay Wright's tenure. I inherited and oversaw implementation of it when she left. The Foundation's only expense, though, was a few hundred dollars to rent the bus to take the group down there. About 60 or 70 community leaders were invited including pretty much all major property owners downtown, all MCF trustees, the leaders of several arts organizations in town (since Paducah's redevelopment focused on the arts), representatives from area banks, Realtors, representatives from other area foundations, all city council members, the city manager, representatives from South Main Street's historic district since it borders downtown, representatives from the Chamber, the media, historical society, and several others. If I recall correctly, about 25 were available to go. They each paid their own way (hotel, meals, etc.), and we covered the bus rental. While it hasn't resulted in any real business developments -- yet -- the trip did spur an ad hoc downtown committee of the Foundation that continued to meet for about a year, and it was the discussions from these meetings that helped convince the city to commission a comprehensive downtown redevelopment land use plan, which was done with city funds, not foundation money. Another direct result of the trip was inclusion of downtown in the United Way's Place Matters project of neighborhood redevelopment, and that has a few promising small-scale projects that are now in the works as a result. It also helped get discussions started with the Penndleton Arts Center that is supposed to be coming to Middletown, but I've not been directly involved in that, so I really don't know any specific details on it other than what's been reported publicly about it .
     
    On the "Second Ward project headed by Scorti," I think you may be confusing two different things. The United Way's Place Matters program is focusing mostly on the Second Ward, and we supported it via a grant to Miami University last year, but Scorti was not involved in that and it has never been "holding money" from us.. However, a project at the time that was headed by Scorti was Middletown Promise, which is city-wide, not Second Ward. That project, for which he is board president, is hoping to secure private donors to fund a scholarship program that would cover tuition for all graduates of Middletown High School. It was modeled after a similar program in Michigan and the goal was to use the leverage of a free college education to attract middle class families to the city, but it had no involvement of the city administration at that time, so it wasn't a "city project" and consequently wasn't included in the above numbers. This was also one of Kay Wright's projects that I inherited. At her final Board meeting in 2007, the Board committed to support this project. At my first Board meeting in 2008, that grant was finalized and formally approved to fund half of the program's first-year operations, which were to focus on conducting a feasibility study to determine whether it was possible to raise the money to do the full project. Shortly thereafter, the program hired Kay Wright as its part-time executive director, but her tenure there ended in less than a year and the program went on hiatus. It recently regrouped and began working again on the feasibility study.
    Back to Top
    Bill View Drop Down
    MUSA Citizen
    MUSA Citizen


    Joined: Nov 04 2009
    Status: Offline
    Points: 710
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2010 at 3:51pm
    thanks Mr. Gordon, that's helpful
    Back to Top
    spiderjohn View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: Jul 01 2007
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 2749
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2010 at 3:43pm
    Correct Mr.Gordon.
    I deleted that posting.
     
    Thank you for your time and explanations.
     
    You have made many excellent choices since your arrival, and I should concentrate on the positives.
     
    The MCF change in leadership would seem to break the connection that was evolving during my brief tenure with the organization.
    Still--I read no mention of the Paducah trip, or the 2nd ward project headed by Mr.Scorti(conflict?) that was holding funds during my tenure with MCF, or any similar "projects". We could have differing definitions of city-funded or city-related granting, however you have been most gracious in explaining your situation.
    Back to Top
    DuaneGordon View Drop Down
    MUSA Immigrant
    MUSA Immigrant


    Joined: May 12 2010
    Status: Offline
    Points: 32
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DuaneGordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2010 at 3:17pm

    Spiderjohn, noticed that your response had been deleted where you said that the clarification I gave was correct and you wondered about the amounts of grants given to the city under my tenure at the Foundation and those of my predecessors. But I took a few minutes to research the answer for you, so I thought I’d post it anyway.

     

    When looking at the numbers, granting for the city has actually remained pretty constant since inception.

     

    Since I came here, I’ve overseen 10 quarterly grant cycles that have resulted in $1.3 million of distributions approved from the Foundation’s unrestricted grantmaking pool. Of these, 20 grants totaling $150,000 were paid to the city, roughly 11 percent. The largest of these were $25,000 to purchase materials for low income homeowner repairs, $24,500 for police training, $21,450 to replace the control system of the carillon bells, and $20,852 for a handicapped-accessible playground next to the Dream Field in Goldman Park.

     

    Kay Wright oversaw about 30 quarterly grant cycles during her time at the Foundation, resulting in $3.5 million in grants awarded over that time. Of these, 32 were to the city totaling $375,000, again roughly 11 percent. The largest of these included $50,000 for the Douglass Park splash pad and $200,000 for the bike path along the river (which we’re still paying off).

     

    During Norm Hayes’ time at the Foundation, it looks like he oversaw about $1.7 million of unrestricted grants, of which about $200,000, again about 11 percent, went to the city. This included buying the showmobile used at concerts, trees for Smith Park, the plaza fountain, welcome signs, and flags.

     

    These numbers don’t include programs of ours that would not be able to make grants to the city (such as scholarships or endowments we hold for specific nonprofit organizations) but do include all of our unrestricted grantmaking for which we accept grant applications.

    Back to Top
    Vivian Moon View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council


    Joined: May 16 2008
    Location: Middletown, Ohi
    Status: Offline
    Points: 4187
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 5:51pm

    As I have said many times before...without the support of the Middletown Community Foundation the Middletown Cemetery would still be a weed field. Mr. Gordon has given me two grants within the past 6 months, one was an educational grant and the other was for the cemetery.

     
    Back to Top
    DuaneGordon View Drop Down
    MUSA Immigrant
    MUSA Immigrant


    Joined: May 12 2010
    Status: Offline
    Points: 32
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DuaneGordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 5:39pm
    I've never posted on this message board before, but I felt some errors in what Spiderjohn stated and insinuations in his posting could not be ignored. Primarily, it should be clarified that the Foundation has never given me any authority to singlehandedly approve any grants.
     
    The Foundation has for at least the past decade, possibly much longer, delegated to a subcommittee consisting of the executive director, the board president, and the board vice president the authority to approve grants of $2,000 or less without taking the matter to the full board. The reason behind that authority had been to allow the Foundation the flexibility to respond to emergency needs in the community as they arise instead of requiring everyone wait two to four months before a decision is rendered on a grant application for a small, immediate need.
     
    The board almost two years ago increased this limit to $5,000 and shifted responsibility for all grant requests of $5,000 or less to this subcommittee instead of the Distribution Committee, but that was due to the fact that the Distribution Committee and Board of Trustees were being inundated with requests for $1,000 or $2,000 or $3,000 that were taking hours to discuss and resolve, and they wanted to instead focus on the larger grant requests ($10,000 or $25,000 or $50,000 applications) and ensure time was available to adequately vet and evaluate these larger requests that have a much greater impact on the community.
     
    In making this adjustment to procedure, the board actually greatly increased the degree of oversight over what had been in place. Under the previous executive director, there was no limit on the amount that the subcommittee could award in a year, and there was no requirement that the board even be notified of grants paid using this method. So, theoretically, the subcommittee could approve 500 grants of $2,000 each, spending $1 million without ever letting the board know about a penny of it. The new procedures capped the annual amount that may be spent using this method and required that all grants paid through this process be reported to the full board every quarter for retroactive approval.
     
    Finally, all grants approved via this method are recorded in the Annual Report that the Foundation publishes every year (available online at http://www.mcfoundation.org/MCF_Annual_report.pdf) and are also disclosed every quarter in our press release of grants paid. The most recent quarter's list is available online at http://www.mcfoundation.org/pr-grant0510.htm and was also published Sunday in the Middletown Journal. We do not, however, single out which grants went through this process and which were decided by the full Distribution Committee and Board (which sometimes will take a request for greater than $5,000 and approve awarding less than $5,000), so not necessarily all grants of less than $5,000 were decided in this manner.
     
    We have approved close to 40 grants using this method over the past six quarters that it has been available, and only four of those were for municipal requests: two of Abby Ison's summer programs for children, one project at the community center, and one park project.
     
    Finally, I'd submit that I don't really have a special relationship with any city official any more so than I have with a few hundred other individuals in the city. In fact, I think I've spoken with Vivian Moon more in the past few months than I have the city manager. Also, the Foundation is not involved in any of these property swaps or financing deals and such on which this topic focuses.
    Back to Top
    Hermes View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: May 19 2009
    Location: Middletown
    Status: Offline
    Points: 1637
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 5:04pm
    I love Middeltown !!
     
    It just keeps getting better !!!  Cry  Dead
     
    Next thing you know the city will want a "street car" like Cincinnati. Shocked
    No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
    Back to Top
    Vivian Moon View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council


    Joined: May 16 2008
    Location: Middletown, Ohi
    Status: Offline
    Points: 4187
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 2:30pm
    Spider
    At the last council meeting Judy stated the they had received a $15,000 MCF grant for the Middletown Cemetery....HOWEVER....she didn't say anything about the $20,000 MCF grant for the Community Center.
    I was told that the City didn't have time to write the grant for the cemetery...so the next question is...who wrote the grant for the Community Center? 
    Back to Top
    Vivian Moon View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council


    Joined: May 16 2008
    Location: Middletown, Ohi
    Status: Offline
    Points: 4187
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vivian Moon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 2:24pm

    Last weeks City Council Meeting
    I have a lot of questions concerning the last week council meeting.

    1.  Renaming of
    Sunset Park – I’m against the renaming of Sunset Park
    .
        Nothing against Mr. Armbruster but I don’t want the name changed.
    2.  Swallen’s Building - I was amazed that the Swallen’s Building had NEVER
         been placed FOR SALE on the open market while we the tax payers
         footed the bill to the tune of $100,000 a year.
    3.  Property for Bike Path – I do believe the City is doing a number on this
         poor guy. He stated that his property is valued at $35,000. The City
         had offered him $2,000 or $3,000 for all his frontage....however it
         seems that the City FORGOT to tell him he would not be able to build  
         anything on the other part of his property. If the City wants and needs
         the property for the bike path then they need to purchase ALL the
         property. This deal has a REEEEALLY bad smell to it.
    4.   
    South Park
    – If we can’t take care of the parks we have now why do we
          need park equipment for another park.     

    Back to Top
    spiderjohn View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: Jul 01 2007
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 2749
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 12:21pm
    you might also check the current relationship between the city and the MCF/Mr.Gordon.
    When I was a member, we voted on allowing Mr.Gordon to approve and pay grants from $5,000 and under, without board/committee approval. I don't care for this type of thing for the exact reasons and examples mentioned by Mike P above. But not wanting to make waves and go against the flow(it happens occasionally), I voted with the majority since my vote wouldn't have altered the decision, and at that time I had no other reasons to doubt Mr.Gordon's intentions.
     
    At that time, the City manager was developing a close relationship with Mr.Gordon and Mr.Scorti, asking for both sizeable and smaller grant requests for municipal pet projects. This also led to confidentiality concerns because the city did not want their grant requests and project intentions made public. I posted(on this site) the specifics of a municipal request for the MCF to fund the salary of a "downtown czar" at $80,000+ to work on downtown projects while being headquartered at the city building. It was also stated at that time that this "czar" would be under city control while not on the city payroll, and this was necessary because ED's Mr.Robinette would ONLY be working on east end renaissance projects.
     
    So--you might want to examine the role of the MCF in any financing, though it is private and not under taxpayer scrutiny. Still--if you contribute to the MCF, you MIGHT want to know exactly how your $$ is being used.
    Back to Top
    VietVet View Drop Down
    MUSA Council
    MUSA Council
    Avatar

    Joined: May 15 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7008
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 11:14am
    I'm confused myself Hermes. Seems we have a conflict in place here. The city doggies are doing a fine job bringing in the "Ghetto Theme" with their pet project of keeping fed assisted people in their buddy's Section 8 houses. And.....at the same time, these same people, who are wanting to create the country's largest ghetto, are promoting the very best "pinky in the air/snooty people only/caviar eatin' champaign drinkin'" fine arts district for our welfare town. Kind of a conflict of styles for the town theme, wouldn't you say? Do any of the    's running this town REALLY know what they want or what direction they want this town to go? OR.....OR....are they trying to come up with a new dynamic program where they try to incorporate a little "artsy culture" into the Section 8/low income community here? If so, it reminds me of the Three Stooges episode where the rich folks take in the stooges and try to make them gentlemen. Great laughs....kinda like the city management.
    Back to Top
    Hermes View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: May 19 2009
    Location: Middletown
    Status: Offline
    Points: 1637
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 9:53am
    Originally posted by Vivian Moon Vivian Moon wrote:

    Ahhh Mike
    You always make my day a little brighter...
    Remember last year when Mr. Adkins came before council and declared all of Middletown a SLUM with the 54% rule so CDBG money could be used in any area of the City….this was a blank check.
     
    With this declaration of being a "slum" why in the world do we need or want an art center ? With the decisions and ideas coming from "the hall" I can't help but wonder who are the crack heads, alcoholics, meth addicts and paint huffers. Could be one or two heroin addicts down there too as far as I know. Or would an addict even make decisions like what we see coming out of "the hall" ? Ermm
    No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
    Back to Top
    Pacman View Drop Down
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Prominent MUSA Citizen
    Avatar

    Joined: Jun 02 2007
    Status: Offline
    Points: 2612
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2010 at 8:11am

    § 209.06 AUTHORITY OF THE CITY MANAGER; PURCHASES.

    (a) Signatures on contracts, etc. The City Manager or, in his or her absence or disability, the person designated by him or her to act as City Manager, is hereby named and designated as the proper officer of the City to sign contracts on behalf of the City, to affix the corporate name of the City to all bonds or other evidence of indebtedness of the City and to affix the Seal of the City to all papers requiring such Seal. Said documents shall be first approved as to form and correctness by the Law Director.

    (b) Authorization of City Manager. The City Manager may authorize the Assistant City Manager or any department director to sign contracts on behalf of the City when the monetary obligations to the City do not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), provided that funds for such contracts have been properly appropriated. Said Contracts shall be first approved as to 2008 S-2 34

    City Contracts § 209.06 form and correctness by the Law Director. The City Manager shall grant the within described authority to the Public Works Director in writing and for no longer than a one-year period.

    (c) Southwest Ohio Purchasers for Government Association.

    (1) The City Manager, through the City Purchasing Agent, is hereby authorized to join the Southwest Ohio Purchasers for Government Association, the charter and bylaws of which Association are attached to original Ord. O87-21, passed February 3, 1987.

    (2) The City Manager, through the City Purchasing Agent, is hereby authorized to make purchases, for the City, of commodities or items costing less than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), through such Association, provided that funds for such purchases have been properly appropriated.

    (3) The City Manager, through the City Purchasing Agent, is hereby authorized to make purchases, for the City, of commodities or items costing twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or more, through such Association, provided that:

    A. The competitive bidding procedures of the Association have been used in such purchases;

    B. Funds for such purchases have been properly appropriated; and

    C. The City Council approves the final purchase price of each such purchase on its consent agenda or by separate motion.

    (d) State programs.

    (1) The City Manager, through the City Purchasing Agent, is hereby authorized to make purchases, for the City, of goods or commodities costing less than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) through program of the Ohio Department of Administration Services (ODAS) and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), provided that funds for such purchases have been properly appropriated.

    (2) The City Manager, through the City Purchasing Agent, is hereby authorized to make purchases, for the City, of goods or commodities costing twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or more through the ODAS or ODOT program provided that:

    A. The procedure set forth in Ohio Revised Code have been followed regarding such program;

    B. Funds for such purchase have been properly appropriated; and

    C. City Council approved the final purchase price of each such purchase on its consent agenda or by separate motion.

    (e) Purchase of real property.

    (1) The City Manager is hereby authorized to bid on and purchase, at County Sheriff’s foreclosure sales, real property, the rehabilitation of which property was performed with Community Development Block Grant Loan Funds (Rehabilitation Revolving Loan Fund). The City Manager may bid up to the amount of the remaining balance owed to the City on such rehabilitation loans, the amount of senior liens on such property and court and sale costs.

    (2) The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to expend moneys for such purposes from the Rehabilitation Revolving Loan Fund, as authorized by the current appropriation legislation.

    (Ord. O97-129, passed 11-18-1997; Am. Ord. O2003-28, passed 4-1-2003; Am. Ord. O2006-35, passed 5-16-2006)

    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
      Share Topic   

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



    This page was generated in 0.238 seconds.
    Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information