Help Replace One of Ohio's Oldest Schools?

Your parallel example about automobiles and maintenance is interesting in nature. You at the end state that eventually you buy a new automobile. This is reflective of your income demographic. In other words not every body can buy a new car. In fact most of middle class citizens and other lower income demographic citizens only buy a used car after they have exhausted the one they currently own.

Discerning about your own life and how you impact other citizens in society that don’t come from your income demographic  is a form of social injustice.

Income demographic is a key issue in the supreme court decision of 1997. DeRolph v. State was a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. Handed down on March 24, 1997, the 4-3 opinion said that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of common schools" as required by the Ohio Constitution and directed the state to find a remedy. The court would look at the case several times over the next 12 years before relinquishing jurisdiction, though the underlying problems with the school funding system were never fully solved.
To better understand this form of discrimination you need to know that schools in rich districts are able to pass levy’s and bonds with shorter terms and as a result more tax is collected from each citizen in that district because of the districts income demographic. This in turn gives this district a advantage to build, remodel, re-invent curriculums for students, offer programs the poor do not receive and in the end flourish as a educational institution while poor districts suffer with the lack of funds.  It all boils down to proportion and relationship. All districts should have equal proportion in funding from the state without funding public education on the backs of property owners. This form of discrimination is so hidden from plain view because the current system uses statistical analysis and surveys to indoctrinate citizens in to a belief that they are doing good for the community, when in actuality they are propagating discrimination based on income demographic funding of public schools threw land tax.

The relationship these pro – lobby’s have with their constituents is based on sound bites that do not tell the whole story.

Yep, maybe that school is broken, and needs replaced, or renovated, or demolished, or made in to a local museum of a day gone passed. But to propagate income demographic

Funding of public schools is straight up a form of discrimination based on income alone.

The poor and lower middle class should not be discriminated against just because of their

income. For 17 years your politicians have neglected their constitutional duty to provide for a thorough and efficient system of common schools" as required by the Ohio Constitution. This concept is in reference that all schools should have a common thread . They should be funded equally irregardless of a districts income or social demographic. In other words the public schools in Indian hills should be a carbon copy of schools in Middletown. Because of income demographics they are not. This creates unfair and unequal funding , a type of discrimination, of all the school districts and relives the state of their constitutional duty as directed by the Ohio supreme court. To change this form of discrimination  all citizens state wide need to vote against all levy’s and bond issues for public education. As a result the state will have no recourse but to acknowledge the citizens vote and legislate a equal , proportioned, funding system that dose not discriminate against any demographic group.