Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, May 4, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sweet Deals in Cincy...........
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Sweet Deals in Cincy...........

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
wasteful View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wasteful Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sweet Deals in Cincy...........
    Posted: Feb 15 2010 at 3:52pm

Taxpayers help 359 Police Dept.
employees ease into retirement

By Barry M. Horstman • bhorstman@enquirer.com
• January 22, 2010

By storing up hundreds of hours of overtime and
unused holiday, vacation and sick days, 359
members of the Cincinnati Police Department
may receive more than six months' extra pay
when they retire at a cost to taxpayers of more
than $23 million.

Of that group, 107 can look forward to at least
one year's extra salary when they retire, thanks
to generous contract provisions that, among
other benefits, entitle officers with more than 19
years' service to nearly 10½ weeks of various
kinds of time off each year, records show.

Eighteen individuals are eligible for two or more
years of salary, led by Lt. David Fink, who over
his 23½-year career has stockpiled more than
10,400 hours. That equals five years of work
weeks worth at least $428,899.

See the Top 10 who will get more than
$200,000

Fink is one of 10 police veterans positioned to
retire with unused compensatory and leave time
valued at more than $200,000 - money that can
be taken in either a lump sum or by continuing to
draw a regular check from the city after leaving
the department. Thirty-six more could get
$100,000-plus checks when they retire.

Overall, taxpayers owed $23.6 million to the 359
police officials with the department's highest
compensatory and leave time totals as of last
October, an Enquirer analysis found. That money
is separate from the officers' pensions.

The amount eventually paid is likely to be substantially higher because officers will cash
out their time at their final salary levels, which
are all but certain to rise in future years.

Hundreds of officers with less than six months'
leave on the books also will collect millions of
dollars more for the time they are owed.

"All that comp time is contractual, but it still
adds up to a big bill for the city," said
Councilwoman Leslie Ghiz. "Even if it's not a
problem today, it will be tomorrow."

Steve Erie, a political science professor and
urban studies director at the University of
California at San Diego, offers a more blunt
assessment of the police contract's overtime and
comp time rules. "If you did these things in
business, you wouldn't be in business long," he
said.

The escalating totals stem primarily from a
contract laced with liberal amounts of holidays,
vacation and sick days as well as frequent
opportunities for officers to earn overtime.

Because there is no ceiling on the "comp time"
most officers carry over every year, 1,000 hour-
plus balances are common among the
department's roughly 1,400 employees.

Under the Fraternal Order of Police's contract
with the city, officers earn:

• 120 hours of comp time every Jan. 1 - time and
a half based on 10 eight-hour holiday shifts.
Officers who work holidays also earn their
regular salary for that day, giving them pay and
time off totaling 2½ times the normal rate. Some
officers choose not to take off any of those
yearly 120 hours, instead keeping them to cash
in later.

• Thirteen days of sick time per year. That, too,
may be converted to cash, with officers getting
one hour of pay for every two of sick leave up to
a 600-hour ceiling, or 15 weeks. If officers leave
the force before retirement, they forfeit accrued
sick leave.

• Annual vacation ranging from 89 hours for
rookie cops to 193 hours - 24 days - for officers
with 19 or more years on the force. Anyone hired
before July 1997 may save up to 587 unused
vacation hours, worth more than 14½ weeks' pay,
while those whose career began after that date
are limited to 394 hours.

• Overtime for which they may choose or are
required to take comp time in lieu of immediate
pay, but which may be cashed in later.

Big spenders

The department is, by far, the city's biggest
overtime spender. Last year, it spent $7 million
on overtime through November, nearly as much
as all other city departments combined.

Rather than being used sparingly for
emergencies or staff shortages, much of 2009's
police overtime and comp time was earned for
court appearances, to complete paperwork or to
staff sports events, concerts and other
community activities.

For many officers, holiday and sick leave
provisions - specifically, the ability to cash in
most unused time in those categories now or
later - are tantamount to an extra four to five
weeks of salary annually.

"It's a classic backdoor strategy that hides the
true cost of public safety staffing," Erie said.

The lucrative police contract provisions, however,
are not the result of unbridled generosity on the
part of City Hall, although coziness with council
members strengthened the union's negotiating
hand over the years.

Instead, the current situation has its origins in
Ohio's very union-friendly collective bargaining
law. Passed in 1984, the law took away police
officers' and firefighters' right to strike,
replacing it with a binding arbitration process in
which a neutral arbitrator resolves labor contract
issues that cannot be negotiated.

In doing so, the arbitrator, rather than seeking a
compromise, must pick either the union or city
position. That rigid guideline, combined with the
fact that arbitrators generally side with unions,
has, city leaders argue, given unions an incentive
to "pile on" economic and non-economic
demands when negotiations start - forcing the
city to make concessions to persuade the union
to withdraw an onerous request before it
reaches arbitration.

Unions' demands

"Bottom line, because of Ohio state law, it is not
ridiculous for unions to make ridiculous
demands," Cincinnati Human Resources Director
Hilary Bohannon told City Manager Milton
Dohoney Jr. in a memo this month.

Over the last quarter century, that process
helped fill the FOP contract with provisions that
create costly obligations for taxpayers long into
the future.

That is especially true for veterans, who draw
the biggest annual allotments of comp time and
time off. For officers with more than 19 years of
service, the FOP contract puts them in the
enviable position of earning up to 417 hours -
nearly 10½ weeks - per year for vacation,
holiday and sick time, before even an hour of
overtime is factored into the equation.

By taking off only half that time annually - five-
plus weeks, still more than most private sector
jobs and even many public ones - officers
gradually build sizable nest eggs via unused
leave.

A typical case is that of Sgt. Brian Meyer, who as
of October had amassed 4,003 hours, currently
worth $141,730, over the past two decades. That
equals two years' pay, meaning that Meyer, hired
in May 1990, is stacking up unused comp time
and leave at the rate of about one year for every
decade he works.

Similarly, Capt. Paul Broxterman, hired in
October 1988, had 4,875 hours in his account
worth $232,248, and Chief Thomas Streicher Jr.'s
3,744 hours from his 38½ years equal a $235,074
payday or nearly two years of continuing pay
checks after he steps down, city records show.

Given their responsibilities and staffing
necessities, many senior officers see their
annual time off allotments pile up faster than
they realistically can use them.

"You get that package"

District 5 Capt. David Bailey said that for most of
his 22½-year career, he has taken off only
several weeks annually. "You get that package every year, but even if I wanted to, there's no
way I could be off that much," he said.

A supervisor since 1991, he said he also has
been required to take comp time rather than
overtime pay for court appearances, adding to
his accrued leave total.

The result is that Bailey, 45, finds himself with
nearly 6,400 comp and leave hours on the books,
a 3-year-plus total worth $304,806. That time
probably will allow him to retire several years
sooner than normal, he said.

"The money really didn't matter that much to me
when I started out so I just planned to take the
time," Bailey said. "I never thought about it
much. I can't say it was a strategy or anything
like that. It's just the way I did it, but now I feel
fortunate that it might allow me to shorten my
career a bit at the end."

Throughout his career, Bailey said he has been
cautious about the overtime he works and that
he approves for officers in his district. Overtime
and comp time, though, are inevitable in police
work, he said, pointing as an example to an
eight-month investigation that last year led to
the arrest of dozens of members of a Northside
gang called the Taliband.

"I can understand people looking at this and
thinking it's pretty sweet," Bailey said of the
contract. "And it is a very good deal. But the
community gets returns in other ways. Maybe
you can't measure it in dollars and cents. But it
definitely pays off."

On the table

Even relatively new officers quickly compile time.

After only 3½ years on the force, Timothy Lanter
accumulated 1,134 hours - 28 weeks - today
worth $33,331, far below the eventual value if he
retires from the force.

Four-year officers Jimmy Pham and James
Broomes also had put aside more than six
month's of time worth $36,347 and $30,974,
respectively, cases that are more the rule than
the exception.

Officers who do not want to wait until retirement
to reap the financial rewards may, under the
contract, each year sell back up to 80 hours of
holiday comp time and, if their balance exceeds
a specified level, another 80 hours of sick time.

Many take advantage of that option, earning
what is essentially a four-figure bonus.

Last year, the city paid $1.44 million to officers
cashing out leave or taking off comp time. Over
the preceding four years, the city's annual cost
for that purpose averaged about $1 million.

With Streicher and other top supervisors
approaching retirement within the next several
years, those annual payments could soar.

Tax considerations, though, will prompt many
veterans to forgo an immediate lump sum in
favor of continuing to draw a check after retiring
for as long as it takes to exhaust their leave
balances, a practice referred to as "running out
the time."

One of the most effective means of reining in
the hefty payments, public budget experts say,
would be to limit the amount of unused time that
ultimately could be cashed in, both on an annual
basis and upon retirement.

"Not having a ceiling is fiscal insanity," said Jerry
Newman, a professor in the University of
Buffalo's School of Management. "It invites, if not
abuse, at least excessive overuse" of contractual
provisions governing time off, he added.

City leaders recognize that such a limit could
substantially reduce the city's short- and long-
term costs, but also do not underestimate the
difficulty of persuading the FOP to give up an
attractive benefit it already has when new
contract talks start next year.

"Seeing the merit of an idea like that and how it
could save the city a lot of money is one thing,"
said Councilwoman Roxanne Qualls. "Getting the
other side to agree to it is another. But it's
definitely an idea that belongs on the table.
 
Everything
belongs on the table."


Back to Top
wasteful View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wasteful Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 15 2010 at 3:57pm
City's police
contract a raw deal

EDITORIAL

January 24, 2010

Perhaps it is unreasonable for us to expect that
government be "run like a business." But surely
taxpayers have the right to demand that
government not be run like a
failing business.

Certainly, the Cincinnati Police Department
compensation policies exposed by The
Enquirer's Barry M. Horstman
- policies that
leave taxpayers on the hook for at least $23.6
million in "extra" pay - point to a business model
that cannot be sustained, in the public or private
sector.

The department's outrageously generous
contract provisions on compensatory ("comp")
time and leave time are job perks you'd never
see in the real world of work, but have come to
be regarded as entitlements at CPD.

As Horstman reports, 359 members of the CPD
are eligible for at least six months' extra pay
when they retire, and 107 have at least a year's
pay coming to them.

Ten longtime police officers have racked up at
least $200,000 in comp time and leave time,
which they may take either in a lump sum or as
continued regular paychecks after they retire.
One has "earned" an extra five years' pay, or
$400,000.

See the Top 10 who'll get more than
$200,000

That $23.6 million estimate, moreover, is bound
to rise as officers "cash out" at higher final
salaries.

Much of that cost comes from this especially
mind-boggling goodie: Each officer automatically
gets a pot of 120 hours of comp time each year -
time-and-a-half for 10 eight-hour shifts - as
"compensation" simply for the
possibility that he
or she may have to work on a holiday. Of course,
an officer who actually does work on a holiday
gets regular pay on top of that.

Officers don't have to take any of those 120
hours off, and there is no limit on the amount of
comp time that can be carried over from year to
year, so officers pile up thousands of hours to
cash out when they retire. And that's on top of
their pensions.

Try getting that kind of deal at your workplace.

"If you did these things in business," political
scientist Steve Erie of San Diego told Horstman,
"you wouldn't be in business long."

Well, not unless you had the power to keep
tapping the deep pockets of taxpayers, that is.

Nobody seems able to explain why such a
provision is in the police contract, much less
rationalize it, except that the Fraternal Order of
Police was able to get it from the city in
negotiations, so they took it.

And who can blame the officers, really, for
accepting what their contract grants them?

These stunning revelations come on the heels of 
which showed that CPD had spent $7 million on
overtime in 2009 through November - nearly as
much as the rest of city departments combined -
even as the city, wrestling with a $51 million
deficit, was considering laying off employees.

Taken together, these provisions won in contract
negotiations over the years mean that officers
with more than 19 years on the force can get
nearly 10½ weeks of time off a year - more
vacation time than most could ever want or hope
to use - plus overtime benefits.

That's just not right.

Long term, city taxpayers face a burden that will
grow to even more unmanageable proportions
unless major changes are made.

Still, it's not fair to place all the blame on
Cincinnati officials. You also have to look
northward to Columbus, seat of Ohio's state
government. In 1984, as Horstman points out,
Ohio passed a collective-bargaining law that
gave police and firefighters binding arbitration in
contract disputes, in exchange for taking away
the right to strike.

The way the law is drawn, arbitrators must
choose either the city or union position, so they
usually give the workers the benefit of the
doubt.

The union, in short, has all the leverage. It can
make demands and either win big concessions in
a "compromise" with the city, or win the whole
ball of wax from an arbitrator.

"Bottom line, because of Ohio state law, it is not
ridiculous for unions to make ridiculous
demands," wrote Cincinnati Human Resources
Director Hilary Bohannon in a memo to City
Manager Milton Dohoney.

Fault craven Ohio politicians for making this
political payoff to unions back in the 1980s. The
supposed champions of the working person
carved out sweet deals that a quarter-century
later are socking it to Ohio's middle class
through the spiraling cost of government.

It's no wonder that Ohio continues to be an
economic basket case.

The police contract provisions will continue to
have serious ripple effects on the city's budget.

Last month, City Council finagled its way around
the $51 million hole and passed a "balanced"
budget partly predicated on a $3 million
reduction in city overtime, much of which would
come from police.

But that projected reduction may be wishful
thinking, given rules that virtually guarantee
officers will get opportunities for overtime or
other extra compensation.

City officials should not simply accept this as a
"part of the culture" or a cost of doing business -
a cost that's passed on to those who live, work
and operate businesses in the city. They must
get tougher in future contract negotiations -
challenging that 120-hour yearly comp-time gift,
for example. At the very least, they should argue
for a ceiling in the number of hours that can be
carried over from year to year.

At the state level, we need collective-bargaining
reforms that will at least begin to level the
playing field between cities and unions -
allowing for more balanced, incremental
decisions by arbitrators, for example. But that's
not likely to happen with union allies controlling
the governor's office and state House.
The men and women who protect us by serving
as police officers deserve our respect and
support, and they deserve to be fairly
compensated. But taken as a whole, Cincinnati's
police contract pay perks are beyond the pale.

Back to Top
wasteful View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wasteful Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 15 2010 at 3:58pm
Back to Top
Hermes View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 15 2010 at 6:13pm
I've worked for union companies & not many will let you build up that kind of time for that exact reason of building up so much money.
 
Unions are a double edged sword,but as I've always said "public servants should not nor ever be unionized".
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 15 2010 at 8:18pm
I have preached about this one since the good mj forum days.
And at the city tax levy forums.
No blame anywhere outside the unions and govt.
If it is there, you have to take it.
 
The pyramid has now inverted, crumbling from the compounding weight above.
 
Who came up with all of these perks, and why aren't ALL of us working this system?
How do we opt in to this taxpayer-funded program?
 
As James Brown might say:
Just talkin' loud
Ain't sayin' nothin
 
People say that I am apathetic
But I don't care.....
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 6:49am
Girls aren't the only ones that go wild. Unions Gone Wild! Perhaps we need to thank the city leaders, no matter what city you live in, for allowing the police, fire and teachers unions to have total control of all union/city negotiations. Apparently, no one can say no to the unions on the city/ schools negotiations teams and we are seeing the results of "not saying no" in stories like these. I have never worked for a union shop. All of my employers in 42 years, have never offered accrued vacation or sick time hours until now. All had no sick time hours nor vacation hour rollovers. My current employer, UD, is the first to offer sick time hour accumulation but you are only allowed to accumulate up to a certain amount. You can roll a certain amount of vacation hours over into the next year, but you lose any vacation hours not taken if you have gone over the limit that is allowed in the rollover. How do we get the negotiations back on track to a reasonable situation without inflamming the union people who have had their way for so long? Any change in the way the city negotiates, will get static from the union folks. Is there such a thing as getting cops, fire personel and teachers to bargain for reasonable bennies without breaking the backs of the taxpayers? Probably not. Two choices here I guess.....either keep giving them what they, when they want it, or start saying no and risk a union uprising and work stoppage and deal with a lawsuit brought on by the union when you bring in cheaper non-union public servants and violate the current contract.
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 9:11am

So--we passed a levy dedicating 100% of the resulting funds to public safety for 5 years(estimated $15 mill total, which might be over-stated).

 
Has the city borrowed into this funding and spent the $$ elsewhere?
Seems that this was hinted around at a past Council meeting.
Does anyone know, or is anyone from Admin/Council willing to honestly answer?
 
I am willing to go downtown to ask this ? 2 nite if necessary, and I would expect an honest detailed answer from someone. If "they" refuse to answer, then we actually KNOW the answer. 
Back to Top
Pacman View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jun 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pacman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 9:32am
By my calculations, if they are correct, they should have taken in about $2.3 Million last year from the Public Safety Levy. 
 
"City Manager Judy Gilleland said a new public safety levy could come before voters as early as November 2011. The current public safety levy will only provide funding through the end of 2012, she said.

“We need to start talking about it later this year, as far as strategy,” Gilleland said. “We would be asking for at least what we’re bringing in now.”

As the 2010 budget was completed prior to police bargaining units agreeing to a new contract with the city, Carolus said those increases will come out of the public safety levy fund.

On a related note, the issue of police pensions increasing from 19.5 percent to 24 percent over a five-year period was also discussed. The increase is estimated to cost the city approximately $55,000 for every percentage point, according to Carolus."

Back to Top
Nick_Kidd View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nick_Kidd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 11:05am
The public safety levy was never meant to go to the police and firemen. The city said that it would not add any police or firemen, it would keep them from being laid off. The city hires all these other people but in order to keep them they claim that police and firemen are the only place they can make cuts. That is how our "leaders" hold our safety hostage so they can do whatever they want and force us to pay up. 
Government is not the answer to problems, government is the problem.
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 11:30am
Geez!!!  I've told you and told you and told you and told you all about this, including BEFORE the vote on the "public safety payroll tax" increase!!!  I'm not going through it again...go back and look it up!!!  I've posted at least a dozen times!!!
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Hermes View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Feb 16 2010 at 11:47am
The unions & the city officials need to be told in no uncertain terms NO MORE LEVIES until the unions give in to the people who pay them !! The negotiations that take place between the city and all of these unions are suspect to begin with. The time has come to quit giving in to these thuggery unions ! I know as well as probably several of you how unions operate and the steps they will take if they don't get what they "demand". I don't care anymore !! If cops,firemen & teachers want to strike then strike !! A city is not a company, a city does not turn out a product or service to make money from, the money that is being "extorted" comes from the people and the people need to know and have a right to know what is taking place in these alleged negotiations. And the big pay days need to come to an end for these unions !!
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 05 2010 at 6:28am
correct sawan---and how badly did Florida beat Cincinnati?
What was the final score?
Back to Top
angelababy View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Aug 04 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote angelababy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 27 2010 at 2:10am
I've worked for union companies & not many will let you build up that kind of time for that exact reason of building up so much money.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information