Print Page | Close Window

Does the UAW understand Capitalism?

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Outside World
Forum Name: News, Info and Happenings outside Middletown
Forum Description: It might be happening outside Middletown, but it affects us here at home.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=745
Printed Date: May 15 2024 at 10:51pm


Topic: Does the UAW understand Capitalism?
Posted By: John Beagle
Subject: Does the UAW understand Capitalism?
Date Posted: Dec 04 2008 at 3:34pm


They have been a very powerful force in automotive manufacturing in the US. The United Auto Workers have members making over $70 per hour to do low tech work.

And if a member is laid off, the member get 95% of his or her salary.

Members of the UAW don't live in the real world like the rest of the country.

Even with this crisis, the UAW is just now talking about making minor concessions. Yet the members feel that they have already made concessions and that they are doing their part aready.

UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said the union must help persuade Congress to offer the loans or risk destroying what he said is the country's economic spine.

Mr. Gettlefinger, just doesn't want to face it, the UAW is the problem. Jobs that pay $70/hr could be easily replaced by jobs that pay $14 per hour. The UAW just isn't in a position to make serious cuts.

Is this the begining of the end of the UAW?

-------------
http://www.johnbeagle.com/" rel="nofollow - John Beagle

Middletown USA

News of, for and by the people of Middletown, Ohio.



Replies:
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Dec 04 2008 at 9:08pm
For 36+ years of working, I've always leaned toward the labor side of the fence in the working arena. I got that mindset honestly from my Grandpa, who worked for Armco for 46 years and his stories persuaded me to be leery of management. I'm on my 41st year of working, all for non-union shops, never coming close to $70 per hour on the wage scale, including benefits. I suppose unions were well intended when they started in the 20's or 30's. Perhaps management and company ownership treated their workers poorly back then with a dangerous working environment and unfair labor laws on the books. As time went by, somehow, someway, the unions got too full of themselves and started trying to dictate to the company how it was going to be. Now, they've basically negotiated themselves right out of a job by draining the company of money for wages and benefits costs. In this case, I can't justify supporting union folks as they have become ultra greedy in their demands.Couple that with a management team that was not inventive enough to keep up with the changes in the industry and has cowered down to union demands and we have a disaster that will be painful for all to fix. Union folks have lived the good life for quite a while now. Looks like that good life is about to hit the wall of reality where wages and benefits are more in line with the skill level of the job.


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Dec 04 2008 at 9:19pm
Does the UAW understand Capitalism?
 
An equally (or perhaps even more) important question:  Does CONGRESS understand capitalism???
 
They seem to be slowly nationalizing private enterprise!!!


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 6:20am
The Unions understand one thing it is about....ME, ME, ME, ME and nothing else matters.  Unions are a significant problem for Ohio, from City Unions to Private Unions.  Personally I think it is time for a little Ronald Regan Air Traffic Controller type of action.  $70.00+ an hour I guarantee you, you will have no problem filling those jobs for about half of that and that includes benefits.  Same goes for Public Safety Unions either play ball with the City and its Citizens or Layoffs are coming.


Posted By: Bwood
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 10:51am
The $70 an hour figure is deceptive. The cost of a worker for an hour to GM is $70. This is from factoring in benefits and wages from the current employees on top of retiree benefits. No one is actually paid $70 an hour.


-------------
Looking for news or information on display technology? If so Visit the http://amonitorblog.blogspot.com/ - Monitor Blog


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 12:36pm
Bwood I am well aware of that, that is why I said that includes bennies.


Posted By: Bwood
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 1:26pm
An average UAW employee makes around $25 an hour. Even if the big 3 replace all of the jobs at $14 an hour, they would only be saving $10 off the $70 figure because of the "legacy cost" that the retirees impose on them. Anyways, that's quite impossible with the power that UAW has, so the point is moot. The UAW wants to continue operating the way that they have always been during prosperous times, and the money just isn't there.

The government will be footing the bill whether the place gets bailed out or bankrupted. Too many people were promised too much money, and it's much harder to take something away from someone than it is to give it to them.

Quote UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said the union must help persuade Congress to offer the loans or risk destroying what he said is the country's economic spine.


This guy is delusional. Honda, Toyota, and Mitsubishi will eagerly step in and fill in the gaps in the economic spine.


-------------
Looking for news or information on display technology? If so Visit the http://amonitorblog.blogspot.com/ - Monitor Blog


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 2:00pm
BWood- it is understood that the $70 rate includes wages + bennies. The real story here is that the rate outside of the union shops is more in the $40 per hour rate for wages and bennies. That is the focus here. Need to reduce the hourly rate of the union shops while requiring union workers to assume more of their monthly premiums for medical and dental like us non-union folks were asked to do several years ago. It is long past due that union folks start operating under the same conditions as the majority of the working world must do.


Posted By: Bwood
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 2:30pm
That's what I am saying. Times are no longer prosperous, but with the union in the way, there is no way for GM, Chrysler, whoever, to cut the budget, and the UAW doesn't realize that they are going to milk the cow to death.

-------------
Looking for news or information on display technology? If so Visit the http://amonitorblog.blogspot.com/ - Monitor Blog


Posted By: tomahawk35
Date Posted: Dec 05 2008 at 10:51pm

I think that in order for the auto industry to get any kind of help, that the taxpayers demand that the top leaders of this failed industry should all be replaced. Why should they be allowed to continue to profit when they were the ones in charge of this failure. If they couldn't make this work from the start then I would assume that they will devise some underhanded way to escape with more money and perks in their pockets if they see that this money was a wasted venture. I would like to see Congress ask for their resignations in return for taxpayer's help then we would really see how much they cared about the industry. We need more concessions from the unions also.



Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Dec 06 2008 at 7:42am
Bwood maybe the Big 3 need to call Toyota and Honda and see how they are doing it for about $40.00 per hour.LOL 


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Dec 06 2008 at 6:44pm
A  Modern Parable.
A Japanese company ( Toyota ) and an American  company
(Ford Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri 
River   Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their
peak  performance before the race.
On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.
The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to
investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.  A
management team made up of senior management was formed to
investigate and recommend appropriate action.
Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1
person steering, while the American team had 7 people
steering and 2 people rowing.
Feeling a deeper study was in order; American management
hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of
money for a second opinion.
They advised, of course, that too many people were steering
the boat, while not enough people were rowing.
Not sure of how to utilize that information,  but wanting
to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing
team's  management structure was totally reorganized to
4 steering supervisors,  2 area steering superintendents
and 1 assistant superintendent steering  manager.
They also implemented a new performance system that would
give the 2 people rowing the boat greater incentive to work
harder.  It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First
Program,' with meetings, dinners and free pens for the
rowers.  There was discussion of getting new paddles,
canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for
practices and bonuses.  The pension program was trimmed to
'equal the competition' and some of the resultant
savings were channeled into morale boosting programs and
teamwork posters.
The next year the Japanese won by two miles.
Humiliated, the American management laid-off one rower,
halted development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and
canceled all capital investments for new equipment.  The
money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as
bonuses. 
The next year, try as he might, the lone designated rower
was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles,) so
he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe
equipment was sold and the next year's racing team was
out-sourced to India.
Sadly, the End.
Here's something else to think about: Ford has spent
the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the
US , claiming they can't make money paying
American wages.
TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a
dozen plants inside the US   The last quarter's
results:
TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits while Ford racked up 9
billion in losses.
Ford folks are still scratching their heads, and
collecting bonuses... 



Posted By: arwendt
Date Posted: Dec 08 2008 at 8:45am

Great post Vivian.



-------------
“Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power.” Benjamin Franklin - More at my http://wordsoffreedom.wordpress.com/ - Words of Freedom website.


Posted By: John Beagle
Date Posted: Dec 08 2008 at 10:34am
That was a very interesting parable.
 
What I get out of this is that the Big 3 have too many chiefs and not enought indians. The few indians we have are either overworked or have figured out how to be fat and lazy from all the good pay and benefits.


-------------
http://www.johnbeagle.com/" rel="nofollow - John Beagle

Middletown USA

News of, for and by the people of Middletown, Ohio.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Dec 08 2008 at 2:30pm
Hmmmmm...Too many chiefs and not enough indians....Hmmmm...Now that I read it again it sounds a lot like Middletown City Hall.



Print Page | Close Window