Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, May 25, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Laubach feels Middletown is....
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Laubach feels Middletown is....

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 8:23pm
Josh, what is irritating is that the opinions of those who WANT this are not based on data or facts but rather feelings (I love art, "Wouldn't it be nice to have...", etc.)
 
But those who DO NOT WANT this project are not opposed to art necessarily but see this as a dollars and cents issue, a common sense issue, and a project that has no reliable data to support it.
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 8:05pm

Mr. Laubach:

As far as leaving buildings empty and subject to breeding crime, you are ignoring a big part of the equation and that is the anti-business attitude by certain factions at City Hall.

The reason, and the ONLY reason, that many businesses have been kept out of Middletown is that city hall has kept them out.

Case in point? Middletown Area Senior Citizens wanted to stay downtown and made a SIX FIGURE offer for the Swallen building. They wanted to have their activities on the main floor and seniors’ apartments on the upper floors. This would’ve meant residents and many visitors downtown. PERFECT! Just what the doctor ordered! City hall said “NO”!

Members of the “snob” clique downtown stop every attempt at non-snob commerce downtown. THAT is why the place remains a crime-ridden ghost town. Stop that and things will change. Squandering the public treasure on repeated attempts on re-packaged playgrounds for the chosen few will NOT change anything but will simply seal our fate.

Sir, you state that you “did not pick the kind of business” and that is true. But please look at who DID “pick the kind of business” and you will find that it is the same ones who have been “picking that kind of business” for years and that it is ALWAYS the SAME “kind of business” to the exclusion of all other kinds of business and it is the “kind of business” that has always failed in downtown Middletown, and THAT is the problem!

THAT is why no one will finance this “kind of business” with their own money here and that is why it is unconscionable to finance it upon the backs of the working poor and their children and grandchildren!

PLEASE, Sir, do the right thing, and lobby your fellow council members to do likewise. Not one of them would risk their own money on such a venture. How can they possibly, in good conscience, keep risking ours?

Then take POSITIVE action and rid City Hall of the anti-business cancer and begin to allow REAL investment by private businesses in our city!!!

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Smartman View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jun 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 299
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Smartman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 6:18pm
Just remember this. Miss Judy wants this, right? She has convinced all her little followers to support her. Lets not forget  het Boy Toy Sammy is an artist! She might be working towards another place for him to show off his art!! In my opinion everyone on City Council needs to go! Sorry Josh you ar disappointment1 jmo
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 6:16pm
OK Josh--what really sets me off here is that the rest of Council and YOU think so little of this city and our property assets, that you are falling all over yourselves to spend a half mill of taxpayer $$ to restore a prime property location, then GIVE IT AWAY to an out-of-town private enterpreneur(who has paid for his ventures elsewhere). You are pretty much saying that we and our assets are less than worthless, and we cannot rise from our malaise by ourselves. Your Council cronies and yourself are beingconvenient quitters imo, . No fight or toughness whatsoever. 
 
Why not restore the building to Pendleton specs, then LEASE it to them on-going for $1 oer annum, with continuation contingencies based on performance? If enough conditions and gain result over a 10-year period, THEN sell the building for $1.
 
I wouldn't expect our ED dept. to value this community as much as many posting here. They have no real tie to the area. They have taken the easy road with every project, selling us out and short to achieve their self-percieved "successes". 
 
So--this is FAR from a done deal.
Show your professed loved for our community and that particular area by standing up for our worth as people and local opportunity. If Pendleton REALLY wants to be here to make a positive, they will still play along. Then possibly we all can win. Our city WILL recover in some way at some time, and this location could well be very valuable. PLEASE don't throw it away like it/we are nothing.
Back to Top
swohio75 View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jun 13 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 820
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote swohio75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 4:57pm
Originally posted by Rhodes Rhodes wrote:


Can anyone name at least own downtown property owner that has an impressive net worth? (besides Akers' stake in Manchester) My point is, this is what happens when you have a bunch of middle class wanna be somebody types. They never have the money to do anything on their own, so they try to raid tax dollars. It's disgusting.
 
Valens?   Thatcher (well his family)? 
Back to Top
randy View Drop Down
MUSA Official
MUSA Official
Avatar

Joined: Jan 13 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1586
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote randy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 4:33pm
I was planning on staying out of this...but I just cant!! I do not think for one second that an art center will help downtown, but it sure as hell cant make it worse can it? I hear everyone saying no to an art center but any ideas about what should be done. Execpt the crime...Yes there is a ton of it downtown. It will be there no matter the business until cops in this town step up and take some serious action.
 
While I disagree with the art center idea and the using of tax money, I do agree that Mr. Laubach has had more than one meeting and we all had a chance to attend and speak up. I will also give credit where credit is due. He does show up here and answer some questions...no one else does, or at lest not often or more than once.
 
Lets hear some real ideas about downtown and what we should do?? and level all of it does not count!!
Call me for a www.CameraSecurityNow.com quote 513-422-1907 x357
Back to Top
Observer View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Dec 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 46
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Observer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 4:15pm

Vet,  what i mean by saying we can disagree with josh without being disagreeable is that even though most on this board may disagree with josh's vote and josh may disagree with their opinion, that we can have those disagreements respectfully and without having a personal falling out.  In essence you know josh's opinion and why he has that opinion and he knows yours.  It doesn't sound like either party is going to change their mind so we accept the vote and move forward.  Not saying you're being disagreeable, i was just making a general statement regarding the topic.

As to your point about Josh being the voice of the people and conveying their desires...obviously that is correct and you're welcome to, and I think, have an obligation to express your opinion to your elected officals.  However, i doubt anyone here has gone out and polled the 40-50k residents of Middletown on this project.  So i doubt any of us can claim with absolute certainty what the will of the people of the entire city is on this subject.
I personally have mixed emotions on this project and can see both sides of the coin here. 
Back to Top
Rhodes View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jun 18 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rhodes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 4:09pm
I think Josh must be forgetting why so many voted for him. We were tired of this exact thing happening over and over and over. We thought we had someone that was not going to fall prey to these insane downtown fantasies.

Can anyone name at least own downtown property owner that has an impressive net worth? (besides Akers' stake in Manchester) My point is, this is what happens when you have a bunch of middle class wanna be somebody types. They never have the money to do anything on their own, so they try to raid tax dollars. It's disgusting.
Back to Top
Storm Ahead View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant
Avatar

Joined: Aug 04 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Storm Ahead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 4:00pm
Tsk, tsk,tsk. Councilman, you have entered the lair of emotional wolves. Continue to read what they write, for they are oft-times accurate. Me thinks your responses would be wiser in emails or phone calls as you suggest.
 
I just wish we in this area, would start working up the food chain to Columbus, (where legislation could be passed forcing banks to mow lawns of foreclosed properties), and Washington D.C., (where true tax reform could become a reality and GATT and NAFTA should be revisited)
 
City Councils are big fish in small ponds.
 
While we are "nation building" in Iraq and Afghanistan, maybe we can dust of our Constitution and rebuild a better one here at home?
Stormy
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 3:54pm
Observer- Josh's primary job is to represent the people who elected him. That means conveying their wants and needs to the council and working toward seeing that it gets done.

We can disagree without being disagreeable? What?

Yes, Josh has done a good job, but he has disappointed alot of the people who have supported him to date on this topic. He is wrong in his stance on this one. No public money to fund a private business venture. The taxpayer should never take the hit on a failed business, especially on a consistent basis, like we do in this town with these repetitice bad decision made by some of the city leaders.

New jobs? In an arts district? Would they be worth considering as viable income worthy of creating a decent lifestyle? Doubtful.

They are wrong and we're all telling them they are. Nothing wrong with that. 10/4?
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 3:45pm
Fair enough Josh. I understand your response. Some comments.....

" I represent the voters" - Yes you do. Now that you realize that, how about showing us that you are willing to bring our wants, needs and wishes to the council table by engaging us in listening to what we have to say and repeating it at the council meetings.

" I have never received an E-Mail, phone call from you...." - No you haven't and I have been negligent about that. It's also a two way street. I look for my rep to solicit information from me by random phone calls, an occasional survey or any other means to "get the pulse" of what the people he represents are thinking on specific matters of the city.

"only eight people showed"- perhaps that should tell you that that is not the best way to encourage participation. The majority of people are just plain apathetic. Some work odd hours and can't attend and some want to attend but have other obligations (such as myself)

"Disagree with the "artsy" idea, it still brings people".- How do you know that? Beau Verre, an "artsy" store, hasn't exactly had the doors torn off the hinges with people flooding to get in the place, has it? What evidence do you have that the arts will attract a large group of people to the downtown area? It's gonna take alot more than that to bring people back downtown again.

"For some people, this issue is unpopular. For others it's very popular"- I would imagine, given the habits and practices of the people who live in Middletown, the MAJORITY of the residents don't care whether there is an arts district downtown or not. I also would imagine, again, given the demographics of the town's residents, that a very small percentage of the population find this idea appealing. This is a blue collar town Josh. It is not West Chester, Mason, Springboro, Indian Hill or Hyde Park. It is hardly a cultured town.

"be demolished, which would require spending the public money"- What?...What about spending the public's money on this loan to Verdin? Isn't that spending the public's money? What's the difference?

"In this case, we have someone who is willing to move in and start a business quickly"- Of course he is willing. He's having everything handed to him on a silver platter financially, with little to no risk to him. The taxpayer is taking the risk and you council people are suppose to be representing our best interests in this, but aren't. Question for you Josh. What happens after the city has sunk so much money into this venture and it doesn't pan out and Verdin leaves town? Is he out that much? No. Does the city coffers take a hit? Big time! Then what happens......you tell me. How many times does the city have to be financially gouged before the town leaders stop the money losing practices of loaning taxpayer money to fund what should be private money usage projects?
Back to Top
Rhodes View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jun 18 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rhodes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 3:34pm
Observer, This isn't a hard decision at all. When you are elected to be the stewards of the tax payer's money, there is no room for this type of fiasco. Who are these people that will be upset if it doesn't happen? How many? A whole dozen? I bet if a poll was taken asking the citizens of Middletown if they want their own personal tax dollars going to this it would be a 99% no and less than 1% yes.
Back to Top
Observer View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Dec 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 46
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Observer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 3:18pm

I think we’re being awful hard on Mr. Labuach.  We can disagree without being disagreeable. 

 

It seems to me that Josh has done quite a good job since being elected to council.  He’s been one of the driving forces on reducing section 8, held several community events, does a great job communicating  with citizens (including coming on this board) and seems to be a man of honesty and integrity.  People are undoubtedly going to disagree with their elected officials from time to time but if we’re agreeing with Josh on 90% of the things he’s doing we shouldn’t hammer him on the one issue we disagree with him on.  I think that turning to personal attacks probably does not help change Josh’s mind. 

 
This is a no win situation if he votes to allow this development people in town will be mad about the public funding involved….however if he votes no many will be upset that no new jobs or revenue are coming to town.  I don’t envy Josh’s position on this vote.  It is a tough one.
Back to Top
Rhodes View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jun 18 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rhodes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 2:16pm
Josh, you should read a post above from me. Your theory that a business there reduces crime is not supported by any facts.

And why do you think because one building is vacant that it is something the city needs to worry about? There are vacant structures all over downtown. Your reasoning behind this doesn't even make sense. And didn't I just read that the city paid zero for the building?

If you are holding town hall meetings and the biggest topic is Section 8, then maybe that should be the city's focus. I'm trying to wrap my brain around why you and the others think you need to use tax dollars for an art center. Why do you think you have the right to waste tax dollars?

You just said regarding the "artsy" idea that "it brings people". Brings them to what? What are you basing this on? Middletown is not Cincinnati. What businesses will benefit from people coming to an artist studio downtown?

How many businesses have opened so far because of BeauVerre being downtown? Haven't they been down there for 10 years now? How much revenue has been generated by the city loaning (giving) BeauVerre upwards of $300,000? They were already located in Middletown, so what new income was generated by their move and the city's financial support of them?

Did you ask any of these questions?
Back to Top
Jlaubach View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Oct 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jlaubach Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 1:49pm

vet,

Yes I am your 3rd ward rep. Yes I represent the voters. I have never received a phone call or an email from you, spider or others on concerns with this issue. I know you both and have spoken to you in person. I have never given you or others any reason to believe that you cannot pick up the phone or shoot me an email. I have held two town hall meetings (The overwhelming issues brought to my attention involve Section 8) and will hold another. For three council meetings in a row I declared my most recent meeting and encouraged everyone with any concerns, comments or ideas to come forward. Only 8 people showed.  The discussion from attendees was again Section 8 and the use of NSP funds. Spider can attest to that, he was there. The line of communication is wide open (And it will stay that way from my stand point). If you think I am wrong, fair enough. I can take criticism.  However, please do not  put me with other people because you disagree with what I say. Furthermore, I would encourage you or any others on this site to call or email me instead of only posting your concerns on this site. As I have stated before, I don’t always visit the site.

I spoke up last night because I ( sorry to keep using “I” but this is directed at me personally) believed it was prudent for me to share my thoughts with the voters. I could have remained silent and let this deal pass without saying a word. For some people this issue is unpopular. For others it’s very popular. Therefore as a councilmember with one vote, I am left to look at the information given to me and make the best decision possible. The decision to acquire the building was before my time. I have no say in that. It can remain empty (Not a good option. How can we expect to rid the area of crime without people coming to the area. Disagree with the “artsy” idea, it still brings people. I did not pick the kind of business. ), be demolished (which would require spending of public money) or repaired for someone to make productive use of. In this case, we have someone who is willing to move in and start a business quickly.  

Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 1:41pm
Why not just work with MAC to expand their space in order to accomplish the same goals?  Probably cheaper in the end.  Also, Laubach's view which we've heard many times from others about doing something with a "vacant building" rings of just giving up, handing over a city asset for free to just to wash your hands of yet another property.  why not just tear it down like all the other projects going on right now?
 
Not sure what spell some witch put over council (and other cities' councils) that enable them to think the "arts are the answer" for economic problems.  The arts are the interest of the very few, not the many.  And since when have art and artists ever been known for economic vitality?  They call them starving artists for a reason.
Back to Top
Hermes View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 1:13pm

Why would any council member or city employee compare Middeltown to Cincinnati when Cincy has a population of 333,200 (2009 estimates) to Middeltown's 60,000± ?? And to make the statement if it works for Cincinnati it will work for Middeltown is ridiculous !! And to compare Over The Rhine with Middeltown is even more ridiculous !!

What are the stipulations of this Verdin taking over this building ? If the city hands it to him on a silver platter can he decide in 2 years to sell it or abandon it ? Because I'm guessing that the "business" won't be here in 2 years. Middeltown does not have the demographics to support something like this. It was reported that the art center in Cincinnati was successful only after 20 years !! Middeltown doesn't have 20 years to wait.
 
Who is going to go into an abandoned downtown area to buy art ??!!!! The artist who will set up downtown don't even have a place to go eat lunch.
 
This whole deal smells very very bad. The FDA told the fishermen in the Gulf to smell their catch for oil and other contaminants when they catch fish and other seafood,I think someone should be sniffing this deal before we all get contaminated.
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 12:25pm
PERFECT! Mr. Laubach, your response is the perfect example of no constituent representation, which is in epidemic proportion in politics these days.
"Given the situation, I FEEL it's the best option"..
"I BELIEVE without positive activity the downtown will further decline"..
"I MEANT what I said and its my displeasure to hear the grief"...
"I AM no more pleased to have a piece of property sitting"...
"I LIVE my life to try and do what I FEEL is best"....
"I HAVE to do what I THINK is best given the situation"....
I-I-I-I.........
I might remind you that you were elected by the 3rd Ward voters and are SUPPOSE to be representing your constituency in the 3rd Ward area. How many people in the 3rd Ward did you approach to "get an idea" about what the people you speak for on council think about this controversial topic? Would none be an accurate number? In order to come to a conclusion to establish your vote, you needed to talk to the people and relay the majority thinking and transition that to your council vote. Josh, it's suppose to be about WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT YOU TO SAY ON THEIR BEHALF on council, not vote based on your own personal agenda/opinion. The way you handled this excluded the very people you sit behind that council desk to represent. You flat out forgot the people and that puts you in the same category as the Beckers, the Mulligans, the Picards, the Marconi's, and all the other people who sit/ sat behind that desk that have erased 90% of this community from participating in their town's direction. I'm sure you are smart enough to note the results of that type of flawed thinking and the potential drop in support. Would it be prudent to ask around the next time? JMO, of course.
Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 11:53am

If I were on council the first question I would ask of Judy, et al. is  WHY SHOULD WE LISTEN TO YOUR DOWNTOWN IDEAS AT ALL?  There is no credibility.  And they better show a heck of a lot more evidence, data, and proof that this can work instead of listening to a couple speeches and believing it on faith.

Back to Top
Bill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Nov 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 11:51am
I am stunned that all the sheep on council are lapping up the BS thrust upon them by Robinette, et al.  He and Kohler and Judy must have all taken the same course in their Public Administration majors titled "Urban Revitalization-ARTS." 
 
Where is the common sense?   A better idea would be to gather area business owners and ask what growth opportunities they could generate with $250k in assistance.  Guarantee you it would be a better return.
 
Council acts like it's not a big deal and rubber-stamping this as if it is all being done with Verdin's money.  But it's not his money!!!  And why does council not question the "success" of Over-the-Rhine or ask how that area can even be compared to this one.  Why is there an assumptioin that the outcomes would even be the same?
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 10:24am
Jefferson, Smith, and Locke are rolling over in their graves!!!
 
Franklin is too amazed to even go fly a kite!!!
 
Washingington is wondering why brave men died so that the poor could be taxed to give money to the rich with NO HOPE of a return and not even a good pretense of a presentation!!!  Just tell 'em ANYTHING!!!  They fall for it EVERY TIME!!!
 
NO ONE has made a case and you are considering it a done deal!!!  Are you DAFT???
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 10:15am
Mr. Laubach:
Fine, feel free to WASTE this money on the SAME OLD FAILED SCHEME!!!
Arts and antiques; Arts and crafts and antiques; Antiques and crafts and arts; History and arts and antiques; crafts and arts and history; history and arts and antiques and OLDE tyme baseball!!!
No matter how you mix it up, it's ALWAYS the SAME old failed thing, yet somehow, this time our money will be safe???  WAKE UP!!! 
We've tried this over and over and over and over...always on the taxpayers dime and always to NO AVAIL!!!
 
The ONLY thing that changes are the dates and some of the stooges.  Everything else remains the same!  The plan fails, the money is gone, the same old bureaucrats find excuses and scapegoats and put out their hands again and laugh all the way to the bank WITH THE PEOPLE'S MONEY!!!
 
What makes you think it will be any different this time??
 
Look at what they are telling you!!!
 
They did "extensive demographic studies" but can't give ANY specifics!!!  They will draw from a THIRTY MILE RADIUS, but the two joints are nearly 30 miles to the inch (as the crow flies) apart!!!  They draw from EXACTLY the SAME demographics!!!
 
NO ONE, not even the ones who are SUPPOSED to be on OUR side, have given ANY kind of "return on investment" type of estimate!!!  Why? Because there IS NO expected return!!!  It is simply THROWING the money AWAY!!!  NO ONE has said anything but wishes and dreams otherwise, yet the seven of you sit there like you are actually considering this???
 
What are we supposed to think??
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 9:31am
Mr.Laubaugh--I believe that Mr.Verdin purchased his Over the Rhine property, and has an invested stake in that project.
Here--we are fixing the building for him and giving him $250,000 to pretty much spend as he likes.
Then we hand this valuable centerpiece property over for NOTHING! Why not maintain ownership in case the project does not perform?
 
Once again, the local taxpayer is on the hook for millions in another ?able attempt to revive an area of the city that is long past it's prime and primary use. You aren't old enough to have lived through the past 40 years of misguided waste and disaster, so you cannot honestly understand.
 
Every area of our business community is in similar shape, but is also being ignored and hung up to dry by Planning and ED. Just what are your plans for the rest of our struggling business community?
 
Most here ARE intellectually honest to the nth degree. We care very much about our community, and prefer to see city $$$ used properly and in a much more spread-out manner. When the city faces financial distress in 1-2 years, you can look back to the millions spent in the area formerly known as downtown, and measure the jobs/income created and how else the $$ could have been used. Please don't approach the citizens for taxation because of more wasted city funds. Mr.Becker hasn't said much, however his comments are right on the money. Still--Councilmembers who have never done major business budgets, and work in subsidized sectors can't be expected to understand life or death finance.
 
Let this large group of area "stakeholders" put up their own $$ instead of the city being on the hook for 1/3 of the cost of the Main St.project. All of those impressive organizations listed are hardly cash poor, as well as the property-owning stakeholders. Put equal $$ in the hands of your EXISTING business owners throughout the community, since it is well-proven that those businesses can create more jobs in a more timely manner with considerably less risk.
 
How about collecting back due loans to existing businesses(ie the Manchester Inn)?
 
If Council was in such a hurry to attend a social function last night, maybe the meeting(or agenda) should have been re-scheduled. Rushing through a meeting in order to attend a pr function is hardly acceptable, a wrong choice of priorities, and an insult to the tax-paying citizens.
Back to Top
Rhodes View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jun 18 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rhodes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 9:23am
Mr. Laubach,

No offense, but it sounds like you need to do your homework on the history and growth of Over-the-Rhine. PAC is not the reason for the grown of Over-the-Rhine. I don't know where you are getting your information, but it is clearly not from anyone telling you the truth. Don't take my word for it, go find out yourself.

You have no business voting to spend hard earned tax dollars on something as goofy as an arts center in a downtown nobody visits except for rock concerts during the summer. Wasting tax dollars is not going to take care of the crime in the downtown area. Focusing on lowering the poverty levels will lower crime.

I remember many years ago a vacationinig Russian and his wife were in downtown Cincinnati at Music Hall. They left after a concert of some sort (most likely the Cincinnati Symphony) and he was murdered right in front of the concert hall. Over-the-Rhine just back in 2001 had riots if you remember, and it took a few years to pull out of that slump. So this excuse of the "arts" alleviating crime is complete nonsense.

I'm just floored reading your excuse for wasting tax dollars. Unbelievable.

This is why I think council members should only serve 1-2 years max at a time so we can vote them out if they are too weak or too easily influenced by this type of behavior.
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 04 2010 at 9:15am
Gee, Middletown will NOT be drawing from the SAME area as PAC-Cinci, according to Mr. Robinette's "extensive demographics study"!!!  PAC-scam in Middletown will be drawing from a THIRTY MILE RADIUS!!!
 
Here's a clue: SR 122 is I-75 exit no. 32;  Downtown Cinci is exit ONE (coincidently the exit that is less than a mile from PAC-Cinci.  Here's the math: 32 - 1 = 31 miles!!!
Ooops!!! The same darned area!!!
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information